Seeking Alpha

Hyperinflation's  Instablog

Hyperinflation
Send Message
Analyst & Contributor @ The Morgan Report ( Silver-investor.com) ,
My company:
Stone Investment Group
  • Sandstorm Resources: The Next Big Thing? 6 comments
    Apr 3, 2010 1:05 AM
     Aside from Silver Wheaton (SLW) trading at just over $3/share back during the peak of the financial crisis, I have not seen such a potentially attractive valuation among the Royalty Companies. Sure Royal Gold (RGLD); Franco- Nevada (FNNVF.PK) will provide investors with high annual returns over the next decade, but nothing compared to the returns some miners will produce. I'm a strong advocate of investing in mining companies, but believe having one or two royalty companies should be a core part of an individual’s overall investment in this industry. Over the last two months, I have been watching two precious metal royalty companies most have yet to hear of and am very impressed with one of them in particular, personally initiating a generous core position which I look to incrementally increase throughout the next year. The other, Gold Wheaton has resolved a huge hurdle making it far more attractive given its reduced risk profile. Though I think the valuation is very attractive, much of the potential value lies on the acquisition front.

     

    About Sandstorm Resources(SNDXF.PK) - A gold royalty company focusing on advanced stage or producing mines. Though they have only been operating for a basically a year and a half or so, they have already completed four royalty acquisitions. This is amazing accomplishment given they are a micro/small cap company ( <200m market capitalization ). They have an amazing management team headed by CEO Norman Watson (former CFO of Silver Wheaton ). They are very well capitalized, following an acquisition in early March, with nearly 90m of cash on hand. This gives them ample room to deploy at least 60m of their cash balance off in the near term ( as they have a bit over 100m in long term debt). Available funding will dramatically increase, however, over the year as three of their four royalty streams will come online, with the fourth expected in 2011. They can also revert back to more equity financing ( which I personally think they should do ) as they recently moved up to top tier status on the venture exchange, thus they will attract more attention. They have made it clear they are and will continue to be very aggressive on the acquisition front going forward, recently commenting they are in several advanced stage talks with various companies. 

     

    Similarities to Silver Wheaton - Silver Wheaton is recognized for their superior management as they have been able to grow future peak production levels from 0 in 2004 to 45m by early 2010 ( expected to be reached in 2013-2014). But what stands out is the fact they have been able make these acquisitions on extremely favorable terms, with all in costs amounting to more or less 8.00/oz of silver with the exception of a few deals such as Rosemont. One would expect having the former CFO of Silver Wheaton as CEO of Sandstorm, acquisitions would be on comparable terms. In fact, they are currently the lowest cost producer relative to Royal Gold, Franco-Nevada and Gold Wheaton. The average cost per attributable ounce is less than $400/oz. Additionally, like Silver Wheaton, they have little tax liability, another comparative advantage to Royal Gold and Franco-Nevada. The following is a brief rundown of their royalty agreements thus far:

    ·         Aurizona Project - 17% of attributable gold production for LOM, which will initially produce 60k oz/year, ramping up to 80k year with cash costs of $400/oz. They also have the option to purchase 17% of the gold produced from the underground mine ( should Luna Corp decide to develop it). In this case annual gold production will increase to a range of 100k-125k/year.

    ·         Saint Elena - 20% of attributable of the projected 40k annual production. The kicker here is the purchase price of just $350/oz. Additionally this mine has underground potential which Sandstorm will have claim to should they develop it. This would bring total mine production to an estimated 60-70k/year.

    ·         Summit Mine - Sandstorm will initially receive 50% of the first 10k mined, followed by a 22% interest in this small mine. Production estimates are expected to be between 12-14k/ year. Cash costs again are at the low end $400/oz. The operator also has the right to offer Sandstorm an additional 25% interest. This is a key example of generating immediate cash flow ( indicated through the provision above). 

    ·         Ming Mine - Production expected to commence in mid 2011. Initially Sandstorm will receive 25% of the first 175k produced followed by 12% thereafter. Gold production is projected to be between 20-25k annually with excellent upside potential. 

     

    In other words, Production levels will grow from approx 10k in 2010 to 30k by 2012 ( assuming none of the companies decide to pursue underground mines and Summit mines does not offer the additional 25% interest) or approx 36-38k assuming they do. This seems like small pickings relative to the other royalty companies but you have to put it into perspective. Investments are made in hopes of making the highest possible return given the risk involved. Sandstorm resources offers just that: When it comes to valuation, assuming a long term gold price of $1,300/oz, my valuation ranges between $1.72-$1.90/share. Of course valuations are very subjective with regards to required rate of return, LT gold price, etc, but such a price to value disconnect in the valuation mentioned above makes it worth a look.

     

    Added Bonus- Sandstorm recently announced the proposed spinoff Sandstorm Base Metals and Energy whose business model will mirror that of its brother company but focus on base metals, oil & gas. Each shareholder of Sandstorm resources will receive 1 for 1 of the new company. Though it will dilute the brother company by 1/36th ( in order to give some financing to Sandstorm base metals & energy), the new company already has 500k of working capital in addition to an option on the Eagle Lake Uranium project. This will give investors two royalty companies which focus on a range of commodities.

    Disclosure: Long: SSL.V, RGLD, FNNVF.PK, SLW
Back To Hyperinflation's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (6)
Track new comments
  • Congratulations on your discovering of Sandstorm. I don't know how you happened to find them, but for me it was just a coincidence of having and keeping Rambler on a Watch List I have. Though I had no investment in Rambler I did have one with Altius over a year ago, and Altius had/has a piece of Rambler, so it sat in my Watch List. It was about a month ago when I noticed a News release for Rambler. After reading the PR, I began to research Sandstorm, and invested that day.
    The deeper I DD'd the stronger my conviction rose with SNDXF. I found the symbol and at that time the Warrants were not available to US Investors. But a couple/few weeks later when SNDXF graduated to a Tier 1 Listing, I called my broker and found the Warrants were now available to US Investors, using the symbol SNXXF. I did place some notes in a post on a Canadian message board to give a starting point to DD SNDXF for anyone interested.
    There are several articles I found also, but I don't believe many people have ever heard of Sandstorm. Their Model of using Volumetric Production Payment - VPP's is worth a DD itself, Beneficial to both parties. I'll leave 2 links, along with the Symbols I included in this post for US Investors. They are moving rapidly, as can be seen by reviewing all that happened in the past month, and all they have accomplished within the past year.

     

    www.gold-speculator.co...

     

    Sandstorm Resources and the Gold Royalty Model
    By Midas Letter
    Published: June 25, 2009

     

    But the real kicker for the company and its shareholders is the fact that most companies go into production on a resource calculation that is typically representative of the smaller portion of a larger deposit whose reserves and resources are typically enhanced over time through continuing exploration.

     

    Sandstorm gets to ride the exploration upside at no additional cost. So if the deposit grows over time to several million ounces, the win for Sandstorm and its shareholders is amplified exponentially.

     

    [ DD starting points in this post ]
    www.stockhouse.com/Bul...
    13 Apr 2010, 10:04 AM Reply Like
  • is sandstorm moving out of the pinks soon?
    15 Jul 2010, 11:45 AM Reply Like
  • Author’s reply » I don't know if they ever will. Take Franco-Nevada for example, is more than 10x the size and it still only traded on the TSX. It also doesn't really matter as Pink Sheets LLC is just a market maker, so if you really like a company its still worth buying, just be careful of the bid-ask spreads.
    15 Jul 2010, 01:00 PM Reply Like
  • What about the downgrade of production at lake shore being lower for Q2? Does that impact sandstorm?
    19 Jul 2011, 12:13 PM Reply Like
  • Author’s reply » They don't have a lake shore gold stream
    19 Jul 2011, 01:12 PM Reply Like
  • af.reuters.com/article...
    Here is the story, grades affected too.
    19 Jul 2011, 12:14 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.