LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (& a 67 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
  • Ever Though About The Time Ahead, When Money Is Destroyed? 2 comments
    Feb 2, 2014 5:45 AM

    As a follow-up to my successful thought provoker blog-posts ("A World Without MONEY - Ever Thought About It?"-Parts A, B, and C.), from over in a Facebook social group today, I posed the following:

    We can talk 'till the cows come home' on ways to "beat", the system.

    How about our thinking of ways to "defeat", the system?

    I asked ..... How long will it take for people in our world to get to learn (and to fully comprehend?) that ALL police contracted within the claimed 90% of all the western jurisdictions (throughout the world) that are now said to be under Maritime law - are all ACTING UNlawfully?

    How long then will it take for people in our world to then comprehend that there is NO living flesh and blood 'person', who is above the law?

    IF police are breaking the law (and, they have been proven to be doing so here in our group), how can a dead corporate fiction "person" possibly ever break a law?

    I mean ....... It can't breath or, hear or, see, no? (At law.)

    Especially when it is only to do with a 'Statute', an Act, a Road rule or, no more than what is simply, a 'pretend' law?

    Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."

    The police ARE clearly breaking what is, law.

    Yet, the very "person" driving any automobile (the person that has been deemed to have broken a statute or, Act) is ONLY (and is, in law), only a corporate fiction.

    Unless that living flesh and blood 'person' consents (contracts) to being this 'fiction' NAME, and to have broken a law.

    How can a 'dead' fiction person possibly commit a crime?

    Police (armed with guns/batons/capsicum spray, etc) are now using coercive or, forceful tactics to make 'living flesh and blood ' persons, answer to a corporate fiction NAME. (In doing so, that living man/women is unknowing committing a crime or, they are personating someone who they clearly aren't.)

    What's 'he who makes the law' (Francis), had to say of this?

    "On September 1, 2013, all the judges, lawyers, police, government officials, and those posing as government officials, and all officers of corporate franchises and entities organized under the auspices of the UNITED STATES and its STATE franchises become fully, personally, and commercially liable for their actions and omissions against the living beneficiaries of the public trusts"

    Yes, as 'living flesh and blood persons', it is we who ARE "the living beneficiaries of the public trusts"

    A great understanding- tiny.cc/52inax (copy/paste to address bar.)



    Now The Pope (Francis) has virtually given governments of the world a window of three years to get their 'houses' into order, according to some pretty intensive (and excellent) research notes, I've read. Unless (the research maintains), the people were to become aware, much more sooner.

    "Above all other tribunals, both civil and ecclesiastical, stands the Pope as the supreme tribunal of last resort for all the litigation of the world. From his decisions there is no appeal.

    Under the canon law the Pope sits in judgment on all civil powers. Appeals from their highest tribunals go directly to him.

    But no appeal lies from his decisions, and only God is permitted to judge him. Any attempt to appeal from the judgment of the Pope incurs the severest ecclesiastical penalties." [Page 10]


    When people learn of a correct way to take those breaking the law through a court of record and the appropriate level of jurisdiction, I feel that MONEY - with an initial run on the corporations for remedy - along with the corporations themselves, will be destroyed.

    And after people regain their courts Juries can be made up of the elderly people (the elders) in communities, earning "value" credits, by doing so.

    ALL Police, etc will then be held fully accountable when being 'judged' by their peers, with those found GUILTY - ultimately being stripped of every asset they possess.

    No doubt that (in my mind), that day is in the not too distant future.

    Always, only an opinion.


Back To LookingConfident's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • LookingConfident
    , contributor
    Comments (932) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » .
    When presenting in court:


    Rom Stover: "Re: Michael, even better is to offer them a Trustee Compensation Fee for acting as TRUSTEE for their charge, that also removes the presumption that you are their PERSON. It also offers them a remedy, a way to have their charge settled, but your trustee compensation trustee charge may be a LOT more that t he charge, it is still an Agreement Offer in order to settle the Account. If they decline your offer then the charge falls back on to them to deal with. . . Sometimes a "Don't Consent" can bee deemed as a Conflict, so if you at least offer them a remedy, even though it's not good for them, it is still an offer to remedy, and not a conflict.


    Conflict is WAR and WAR can through the trust into the TOTAL CONTROL of the administrator, so for that reason, I don't recommend a "NO CONSENT CLAIM" you want to remain in control of the trust and not give them any reason to place the trust into conflict, (STATE OF WAR)..."


    Doone Barry: "Yes Rom I always conditionally accept offers and remain in honour although I have offered trustee compensation fees amounting to millions I now prefer to accept conditionally upon proof of claim, with conditions scripted to educate the offerer, although I have heard heresay of those that have turned dishonour of trustee compensation claims into commercial liens and onsold those liens on to debt collection agencies all be it at cents in the dollar."


    Doone Barry: "And agreed a belligerent stand is not good. Honour should be kept


    Ross Bradley .
    It makes a lot of sense to me, Rom ...In stating that you, as the living flesh and blood 'person' and beneficiary of the Trust, are (and, as you say) 'offering them a Trustee Compensation Fee for your acting as TRUSTEE for their charge.. ..and that as such, you are now directing him/her then (the magistrate - as the Trustee) to dismiss the matter with no further action required.


    REPEAT, if necessary.
    3 Feb 2014, 12:01 AM Reply Like
  • LookingConfident
    , contributor
    Comments (932) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » .
    Never heard of this idea.


    It's Fantastic. I do feel that those doing jobs, could then recieve "digital credits", for luxury items like air/train travel, vehicles, fuel, alcohol, etc...


    Laws (I feel) that would always be needed would come down, to just two.


    1- Do no harm to each other or, to another's property. (The animal kingdom being 'the property', of all the people in the world.)


    2 - Do not deceive. (Tell Lies.)


    A 6 minute video? Watch it! ;)


    10 Jun 2014, 04:27 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.