LookingConfident's  Instablog

Send Message
Longstanding investor in Looksmart (& a 67 yr old ex-tradesman), who has a passionate interest in the problems of newspapers along with their success in all their monetisation attempts made, on the web. For the "times are indeed, a changin", I feel. [17th of Aug, 2011 - Print media... More
  • There Are TWO Bonds. - One "Lawful" And Another, A Fraud. !! 3 comments
    Aug 25, 2014 11:36 PM

    Back in the Facebook group and away from the Market to discover that there are TWO Bonds. One "Lawful" and another, a fraud. !!!!

    On the Larry Edwards thread "We are all quite interested in the "Name Game" being burdened upon us" and in my answer to the not so accurate video he posted, I then replied with the following:

    When Rom Stover pointed out to the world that there are TWO dates on all of the (well, mostly all?) paper copies of (a paper copy of) our Birth Certificate, it made me think.

    I've seen this video before and it too made me wonder:


    With Rom's (such a special) "revelation" and my own further logical assumptions based on previous, limited comprehensions - it became much clearer to me that our 'actual' live birth bond (and at law), has been the means of my becoming part of the Global Estate Trust.

    This (at law), placed me under the jurisdiction of and protects me with the Law of the Holy SEE. - It is a law that dates back to (at least), the Unam Sanctam, when on 18 November 1302, Pope Boniface VIII issued the Papal bull.

    Whether I believe in any unrebuttable presumption (stemming from that law), is of no concern to anyone. The fact is (I'm confident in saying), that I was born into (and at law), this "system of law".

    From that paper copy of (and a copy of) my Birth Certificate (again, as Rom had pointed out to us all), I note the "Registration date".

    This date (5 days after my live birth/actual date, as recorded), is when my mother (shown as an ALL CAPS "person", as N.BRADLEY) unknowingly 'informed' on me and handed me over to being a 'chattel' of the state.

    This act of hers, is/was clearly UNlawful.

    As it can be reasonably assumed that the supposed "CONtract" she was entering into (on behalf of me-as a living male baby and with her as a 'dead fiction' person and not her), was never fully disclosed to her that a fraud was what she was not only becoming a party to - was a fraudulent 'act' being perpetrated by those living men and women of the government, of the day.

    Because (I feel), as the initial Bond (yes, I assume) had been 'shipped off' to the vaults of the Holy SEE (at law), any further Bond that has/had been constructed from my "registration date" (and, as mentioned in the video), would clearly be a fraud.

    There are TWO Bonds. One "Lawful" and another, a fraud. !!

    I hope this all makes sense.

    Always, only an opinion. - tiny.cc/dwj6kx


Back To LookingConfident's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • LookingConfident
    , contributor
    Comments (932) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » .
    “Who created the licences ...... and all these other things that Australian citizens use? It’s the crown or the commonwealth. So they belong to them. And you know, give back to Caesar what belongs to Rome..this is your stuff, so take it back.”


    Yet I'm not so sure of, his last short sentence there.


    It's such a well written, highly respectful story that deserves your full and undivided attention and some serious consideration....


    < ...... As we drive to the place where he sleeps (“I live in here,” he insists, tapping his chest, in a way that prompts you to think about your own life) a police car passes on the other side of the highway.


    “Policy enforcement officers,” Murrumu says, shaking his head. >


    It's about: The man who renounced Australia - http://tiny.cc/a2x6kx


    26 Aug 2014, 04:35 AM Reply Like
  • LookingConfident
    , contributor
    Comments (932) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » .
    "Why create a strawman? The answer is 'in order to charge the strawman imaginary costs and penalties and fool the human James Martin into paying those amounts'.


    These imaginary charges include 'Income Tax', 'Council Tax', 'Inheritance Tax', 'Capital-Gains Tax', 'Road Tax', 'Import Tax', 'Value-Added Tax' [GST], 'Fuel Levy', 'Loan Interest', 'Bank Charges' - and anything else that full-time professionals can think up and are confident that you will not notice that you never agreed to pay and don't need to pay."


    More? http://bit.ly/1oqdZI2


    27 Aug 2014, 10:43 PM Reply Like
  • LookingConfident
    , contributor
    Comments (932) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » .
    In regards to what is "the Law" - isn't it time for a "reality" check?




    2 Sep 2014, 09:34 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.