Seeking Alpha

K202's  Instablog

K202
Send Message
K202 is now back to just the original author again, Mark Bern. Mark is both a CPA and a CFA charter holder. He has a bachelors degree in Business Admin. with a concentration in Economics. His experience includes both private and public sector and careers in accounting, financial and market... More
  • OG's Quick Chat # 95 - 8/26/2010 163 comments
    Aug 26, 2010 7:45 PM | about stocks: SPY
    OG has asked me to take over responsibility for the Quick Chats so that she can sort out some personal things.  OG will be back with us soon after her hiatus.. At that time she will resume posting QC Instablogs.  Until then, I will be your host.  Please be respectful and enjoy the liberty of this space.

    List of stocks mentioned in QC #94:

    (AER), (CEVA), (CPST), (DOM), (EUO), (GDLNF.PK), (GELYF.PK), HGT), (HUDRF.PK), INTC), (LOW), (LYSCF.PK), (MVO), (PBT), (SBR), (SDS), (SJT), (SPX), (SPY), (TBT), (TIE), (TLT), (TMV), (TOL), (TTM), (TXO, (TWM), (XIDE)


    Disclosure: SPXU, SDS, TWM
    Stocks: SPY
Back To K202's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

This post has 163 comments:

Track new comments on this article
  • The last comment posted on QC # 94 was made by Robert Ferguson:

    "Have a greart weekend Gades!"
    26 Aug 2010, 07:48 PM Reply Like
  • I got back from moving my son into his college dorm and have barely had time to catch up! I think I want to go back to college. He has a private bedroom in a suite with four others (each having their own bedroom) and living room and two bathrooms (each shared by two). I remember a room the size of their living room with two beds, two desks, heating cooling that didn't work, two bathrooms on the whole floor that we shared with over 100 others, and four phones in the hallways (over 60 yards end to end). They have laundry facilities and a kitchen on each floor. We had a ping pong table and a soda machine with cups that dropped down while the soda streamed down (mostly into the cup). They have girls in the suite across the hall. We had girls barricaded in another dorm to which we had no access beyond the entry lounge. Our college girls even had curfews (10pm M-Th, 1 a.m., F&Sat, midnight on Sun). If we brought them in even one minute late, we were invited into the entry and had to give them our name so they could fill out a postcard that was sent to the girls parents.
    26 Aug 2010, 08:00 PM Reply Like
  • Mark, my experience wasn't quite as cramped as yours, but when I was at UMass Amherst, we had double rooms, and we created a bit more space by bunking the beds and putting the desks in one corner, but it was definitely not spacious. We also had a coed floor...including the bathrooms. Now THAT made being a freshman very educational...
    26 Aug 2010, 10:56 PM Reply Like
  • They did the same at Yale. But only beginning the year after I left.
    27 Aug 2010, 02:18 PM Reply Like
  • Okay: Forget commodious accommodations; my first FIVE roomies in college flunked out! Therefore, my living spaces became ever more commodious. Thing is...every one of them, I considered more intelligent than me.
    27 Aug 2010, 01:11 AM Reply Like
  • Hard: I would love to pick up on our deflation/inflation debate from the last chat. Frankly, I'm near out of gas. Before I left to Honduras, for maybe three and a half years, I had to micro manage. Moreso now, than ever. And years before that, I was always on the "wary." What's been going on, has been going on, for a long, long time.

    I know I've done the best I can. I also know there's a little more to go.

    But a near $50.00 book! ...Induces laughter.

    Thanks, buddy!
    27 Aug 2010, 01:28 AM Reply Like
  • NP. What's really important, to me, is to hear that your mom is on the upswing. Keep us posted.

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 06:36 AM Reply Like
  • I'll buy it at that price so long as it is signed by the author.
    28 Aug 2010, 03:16 PM Reply Like
  • Peter Schiff the part on the Yen was good
    www.europac.net/media/...
    27 Aug 2010, 07:37 AM Reply Like
  • I've been saying it for over a year. Watch the yen. Its the canary in the mineshaft.
    27 Aug 2010, 09:35 AM Reply Like
  • Rare Earth Prospects Heating Up
    Email Print
    Mon, Aug 23, 2010 Feature Articles
    By Michael Montgomery—Exclusive to Rare Earth Investing News

    0
    diggs
    digg Share The rush for rare earth element mining projects in British Columbia, as was reported last week, is just the tip of the iceberg in this increasingly lucrative market. Mining companies round the globe are looking for economically feasible projects to cash in on a market that has reached an event horizon of sorts, where demand will outpace supply in the foreseeable future. From the ice bound north of Greenland, to the hot plateaus of Western Australia, many upstart operations may be promising.

    U.S. Prospects

    Rare Element Resources Ltd. (AMEX:REE)(CVE:RES) has been developing its Bear Lodge property in Wyoming. The deposit, which is still in pre-feasibility, is thought to have over 7 million tonnes of oxide resources averaging a grade of 3.6 percent. The company hopes to be producing by 2015.

    They have also stated that their new form of processing can deliver 90 percent recovery. One process involves a water scrubbing process; the other uses chemicals such as hydrochloric acid. “It is not so much new technologies we are looking at, but the matter of getting the right combinations together for the deposits we have,” said Mark Brown, CEO of Rare Element Resources. Other rare earth minors have stated the desire to build a processing facility including Avalon Rare Metals.

    Australian Prospects

    Lynas Corporation (ASX:LYC) has been developing its Mount Weld property in Western Australia. Development of the mine has been completed, and the company has set a completion date for the processing plant for December 2010. The deposit has a high grade of rare earth oxides (REO), and at its expected full production will fulfill 11 percent of world rare earth market. The total figure is 7.7 million tonnes rare earth resources at a 12 percent grade, for a total of 917,000t of REO.

    The company has reported increasing rates for its rare earth, especially since the reduction of quotas from China. “The Mount Weld Composition price for rare earths has risen a hefty 102% over the past month, to US$43.28/kg on an FOB China basis as at 23 August 2010,” as reported on Proactive Investors.

    Arafura Resources Limited (ASX:ARU) is developing its Nolan project in Northern Australia. The deposit has total measured and inferred resource base of 850,000t of REO, and 13.3M-lbs of uranium grading 0.44lb/t U308. The company is working on a processing plant, and hope for production in 2012.

    Metallica Minerals (ASX:MLM) is working on a scandium and cobalt deposit. The project is a joint venture with Straits Resources (ASX:SRL). “The combined Kokomo and Lucknow Scandium resource is now in excess off 2,000 tonnes of contained scandium metal (approximately 3,000t scandium oxide),” as reported on Proactive Investors. Scandium in a REE used in fuel cells, low weight aluminum, and high intensity electrical bulbs.

    Canadian Prospects Outside of British Columbia

    Commerce Resources (CVE:CCE) has been working on its Eldor project in Northeastern Quebec. The niobium and tantalum deposit in drill programs has shown a 1.72 percent Total Rare Earth Oxides, with niobium and tantalum mineralization that ranges from 1.15 percent up to 11.4 percent niobium, and 0.046 percentup to 0.21 percent tantalum. For Rare earth oxides the four most common in the deposit are, in descending order cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and praseodymium. “Neodymium oxide constitutes nearly 22 percent of all rare earth oxides present in this zone and is one of the more sought after of the rare earths for use in super magnets and related applications,” stated the press release.

    Crevier Minerals Inc, a private company jointly held by MDN Inc. (TSE:MDN) which has a 67.5 percent share, and IAMGOLD Corporation (TSE:IMG)(NYSE:IAG), are developing another niobium and tantalum property in Quebec.

    “The inferred resource… and the measured and indicated resources, represents a total resource of 15.42 million tonnes grading 0.17% Nb2O5 and 252 ppm Ta2O5. The new estimate shows a significant 23.5% increase in the Ta2O5 grade for this category,” stated the press release.

    With help from Assistant Editor Vivien Diniz

    Questions about this article? Leave a comment below or contact our editorial team at editor@resourceinvesti...
    27 Aug 2010, 07:45 AM Reply Like
  • back, have almost fulfilled requirements for another 12 months of comped flights. Did ok.

    went to hotel in shuttle, left hotel in stretch limo. Net positive around $15k.

    One night was 88 degrees at 9 pm. We will never go there in Aug again.
    27 Aug 2010, 08:17 AM Reply Like
  • We own Straits but not for its REE content. It has good Coal properties It also is chartered to pay 60% of income with an actual payment being made of 1.7 cents, i think.

    Its found on the OTC, can't recall symb offhand. Its a future flier. I like the chart.
    27 Aug 2010, 08:23 AM Reply Like
  • Hurricane approaches, wonder what it will impact.
    27 Aug 2010, 08:26 AM Reply Like
  • Don'tcha just love that Cramer. GDP prediction of .5%. WRONG!

    My (SDS) postiton I put on yesterday is getting stung.
    27 Aug 2010, 09:01 AM Reply Like
  • Let's see, it was 3.5%, then 3%, then 2.8%, then 2.5%, then 2.4%, then 2%, now 1.6%? That includes predictions back in Q1, of course. The most recent govt. prediction that I have seen was that it would be 1.7%, though lots of pundits (like those Cramer was quoting) are seeing numbers much lower. Will they go back and squeeze it down some more? LOL, after all this, how can we doubt it?

    Its also a game of lowered expectations. Last "recovery" at that same time, we were looking at 6-8% growth. So today we are looking at a reduction to 1.7%, and its "good news"?

    Sorry it caught you leaning the wrong way though, Maya. I'm easing into (TWM) on the dips, building up toward an ultimate 10% max (which I will cash in sometime in Q1, if things go as planned). So far I am well up, but nothing wildly successful. I plan to go long Q1 2011, but not before. I will miss out if there is a Christmas Present, I'll not even be focusing on the time period between the elections and the holidays.
    27 Aug 2010, 09:50 AM Reply Like
  • From Harvey Organ's blog:

    harveyorgan.blogspot.com/

    The miners have not hedged for over 2 years now, so the underwriters of both puts and calls are the commercial banks. If the banker underwrote a call, he wants the price of the metal to decline.

    If the banker underwrote a put, we wants the price of the metal to rise.

    Thus you can plot the median price or the least amount of losses that the bank would undertake at various prices.

    Today the options concluded and Adrian presented his final median price on both metals.

    The median price for silver was 18.00, the price of which I indicated to you last night. In gold the median price was 1200.00 per oz

    So you can see that the bankers today got hit pretty hard. Here is Adrian's wonderful graphics on this:

    The first is gold: If the final price on gold today would have been 1200.00 then the bankers would have experienced a negative outflow of 34 million dollars (not including dollars taken in originally) For the first time in many years, the bankers had an outflow of 60 million.


    The Median line between puts and calls

    www.lemetropolecafe.co...

    and now for silver's median line between puts and calls:

    www.lemetropolecafe.co...

    In silver, at the bankers optimum price of 18.00 the cash outflow was only 5 million dollas.

    Instead with todays close of 18.98, the outflow was 15 million dollars or triple at the optimum price.

    The banking cartel got stuffed today in silver as well as gold!!

    ...

    In another stunning development for the first time in quite a while gold moved into backwardation on two consecutive days. Yesterday the backwardation from the August to Sept month was 50 cents .

    Today it was 1.20 with the front month of August higher than the Sept. trading month. However you must be cognizant of the fact that August is a delivery month and Sept is a non delivery month.

    I would like to see backwardation on the first 3 to 5 months to prove to me absolute shortage of metal and a possible default.

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 09:17 AM Reply Like
  • Interesting stuff. Frankly, the giant short positions for silver have been doing this for over two years now - MOST of the time. If it were averaging out, ie, sometimes a plus, sometimes a minus, it would be one thing...

    But almost ALWAYS a loss?

    More there than meets the eye. Maybe my idea that the far smaller silver market is being used as a tether on Gold is bogus, but its one of the few scenarios that explains this odd phenomenon for silver.
    27 Aug 2010, 09:42 AM Reply Like
  • (GRSZF): 8/25, Goldstone Resources Announces Joint Venture Partner Premier Gold Drilling Continues to Expand Near-Surface Gold Zones at Hardrock

    www.marketwire.com/pre...

    8/26, Goldstone Resources Halts Exploration Drilling

    www.marketwire.com/pre...

    8/27, Philip Cunningham responds to Goldstone news release regarding exploration drilling halt

    www.newswire.ca/en/rel...

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 09:39 AM Reply Like
  • Q2 revised down to only 1.6%! More green shoots! The economy isn't as bad as expected!

    May I am getting tired of all the rose colored glasses out there. They may have a point, but it is very flimsy, at best. And it does give the PPT a little help, too.
    27 Aug 2010, 09:50 AM Reply Like
  • Go to Zero Hedge today and get down to at least the Citi article that says QE2 is the death of the USD. Several interesting articles today.

    www.zerohedge.com/

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 09:55 AM Reply Like
  • seekingalpha.com/artic...

    "We're not witnessing a bond bubble in the making, we're living in a statist nightmare".

    Well said.
    27 Aug 2010, 10:14 AM Reply Like
  • (TLT) getting hammered so far today, down 1.42% so far, 10:28 EDT. Is this it? (TBT) time?

    Screwing the poor schleps that got in on the way up or just the TBTF crew putting the Fed $ to work to prop up the market?

    Surely (I know that's not your name! ;-)) the data this morning couldn't cause enough adrenalin rush to push bonds down, $ and market up?

    However, it *is* Friday, maybe I'm premature ...

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 10:31 AM Reply Like
  • HTL: Today is a predictable knee-jerk reaction to Bernanke's promise of QE2. Nothing more than that.

    Personally, I'm seeing the sawtooth pattern I expected for August, and I believe we will see more of the same until folks figure out that QE2 will be no more effective nor lasting than QE1.

    The game has changed, even the RULES have changed, but the public still thinks the American league is going to be putting its pitchers up to bat. Come the first actual game, surprises galore to those who have not been reading their memos.

    Much shock and dismay will there be, when the billions flood forth from the Fed, enter the 2Bigs, and...

    Stagnate.

    The real ball is in the Regime's court. What new spending bills will Voldemort propose, and what will Pelossi put forth?

    And what will the hapless Reid do in the Senate?

    And how soon.

    Time to quit worrying about what the little guy with the beard might do, and focus on the Regime.
    27 Aug 2010, 11:39 AM Reply Like
  • Say, anyone else noticed that the tool bar with the tracking and inbox info is now missing on most of the screens?

    Someone is working on the SA infrastructure today.
    27 Aug 2010, 12:07 PM Reply Like
  • They've got a rearrangement of their mail service going on through the early part of September. When I couldn't connect, I sent an e-mail and they said that infra-structure changes to support this were happening.

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 12:12 PM Reply Like
  • Yeah, it's probably something to do with government filters.
    27 Aug 2010, 01:01 PM Reply Like
  • LOL, yep, got to keep Echelon on top of things. Talk about "net neutrality".

    I see Bernanke is talking about buying equities now.

    Lets see, if he buys up all the GM, AIG, and 2Big stock it could be interesting. How this fits in with the Fed charter is deeply disturbing, of course.

    I think the QE2 promise has about run its course, the markets are in a plateau now. I would not be surprised to see some further upward action next week, though, depending on who figures they can best position themselves to sell to their new best friend at the Fed. Could this turn into a "rally", despite technicals, fundamentals and all logic? Sure it could, if the Fed actually does what they promise. And it could well see us clear through to Christmas, or even beyond, though I suspect the situation will cool off markedly after the elections.

    How big will they grow the Fed portfolio? $4trillion? $10trillion? No outlandish number seems beyond them. We are in uncharted waters.

    How sustainable will any gains in the equity markets be when the only players are DaBoyz and the Fed? Will this return faith to the equities, or just give us an even stronger signal that disaster lies ahead?

    I'm staying buttoned up. This is too wierd for me to play. I'm keeping my commodity bits and my (TWM) hedge until something shakes out (though I have a moderate stop on the TWM).
    27 Aug 2010, 01:17 PM Reply Like
  • I'm actually expecting a small bump for a bit as part of the strategy to influence the electorate (and I recall posting recently that showed market does well leading into mid-term elections a substantial % of the time).

    I'll have my finger on the trigger though - Jack Arujian(sp?) on CNBC points out September is a traditional rough month for the market.

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 01:29 PM Reply Like
  • I heard a rumor it has something to do with the platform for Apps....
    27 Aug 2010, 01:52 PM Reply Like
  • Added more (TWM).
    27 Aug 2010, 12:43 PM Reply Like
  • (CPST): an attendee at the shareholder's meeting yesterday has posted a summation.

    investorshub.advfn.com...

    I'm puzzled that on Yahoo!, Investorshub (just found today - have to browse through and see more yet) and Investorvillage, no one seems to be realizing the effects of the shorting that is going on. Whine about share price without realizing that patience is needed.

    I hate to go to Yahoo! and try to add my bits - the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) would bury it and be one of the things to light off my very long fuse.

    Investorvillage is a pay site and I've yet to decide if it's worth it.

    BTW, (CPST) up 2.92% today, saw some shorts hammer a few times and then what looks like either covering or fresh money driving the price up. Good clusters of volumes and some good size buys coming in (just now a 50.2K block trade up @ $0.6795).

    Maybe somebody w/money is going to manipulate the shorts today?

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 01:07 PM Reply Like
  • More from another investor at the (CPST) shareholder meeting yesterday.

    www.investorvillage.co...

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 02:22 PM Reply Like
  • Is there a change on the Seeking Alpha main page, or is my computer freaking out? I did go from vista to Windows 7 a few days ago....
    27 Aug 2010, 01:32 PM Reply Like
  • Win 7 has the newer(?) Internet Explorer that has some things that you can do to make "older style" sites behave better.

    I've never bothered with that since I use Firefox.

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 02:00 PM Reply Like
  • Its the main page. Its wierd for me too. Cant even log in on the main page.
    27 Aug 2010, 03:08 PM Reply Like
  • Sometimes when SA plays with their website, it stops working in your browser because your browser will use an older version of the SA page it gets from its cache.

    Hitting Ctl+shift+R often fixes SA issues for me. I believe that command sequence forces the browser to re-load the page, ignoring the cache. At least it does with Firefox. If your using a Mac, use Cmd+shift+R.

    I think Ctl+F5 does a similar thing with IE. So basically, it solves issues where SA has modified a webpage, but your browser is still using an older version of the page from its cache.

    SA pushed a change a few days ago. I used the command sequence, and things started to work again. I don't know what the refresh command is in Vista or Windows 7...

    Be sure to look up the command sequence with a direct reference to the browser you are using before executing it... I never use a command sequence blind...
    27 Aug 2010, 04:32 PM Reply Like
  • Word of the day: Incredulous.

    Added (NVAX).

    Please ship 500,000,000 Iowa eggs to Cramer!

    Jeff Miller puts kabosh on HO:

    seekingalpha.com/artic...
    27 Aug 2010, 02:28 PM Reply Like
  • Went long dollar, added to my euro short today...
    Added tight stops on gold and silver.... by the way, anyone looking at Seabridge gold (SA) lately? Its up something like 16% in the past few weeks.
    27 Aug 2010, 03:11 PM Reply Like
  • I don't track (SA), but my own pm holdings have done well over the same period. (SLW) is up 14.7% - (GGB) is up 15.8% - (BPMSF.PK) is up 16.3% - (FRMSF.PK) is up 9.1%.

    (PAL) is flat, and my other miners are all up other than (EDVMF.PK), which is not really a miner, which is down .68%

    Overall that portion of my portfolio is up 11.1% over that period, mainly because I am overweight (SLW), with my second largest holding (GBG).

    REEs are up over the same period, btw, about 12%, representing (GWMGF.PK), (LYSCF.PK) having a great day today, (MCP), and small positions in (GDLNF.PK) after taking profits this week, and (HUDRF.PK).
    27 Aug 2010, 03:43 PM Reply Like
  • "Been down so long it looks like up to me..."

    All my inverse ETFs, PMs, etc, have worked out swimmingly. My one albatross -- getting into TBT and TMV too early. Decided all clients were perfectly positioned except for those two ETFs so my wife and I went for a long hike in the High Country this morning. Came back to find TBT up 5 1/2%, TMV up 8 1/2%. Did I not say I needed to average down? Who's in charge here? Can't I leave for a few hours without missing a nice move like this? Anyone care to enlighten me as to why -- suddenly -- other people are beginning to notice that you can have the government fret over deflation while the real world is inflating -- or is there some other reason these two popped in my absence?
    27 Aug 2010, 03:40 PM Reply Like
  • Opened a double short position in the Nasdaq (QID) based in Intel guidence today.
    27 Aug 2010, 03:41 PM Reply Like
  • Wishing SA, while it's fixing itself, would put back the Insta list, as well as the comment list.

    I'm not enjoying having to plunge into the substrata to find who knocked out an Insta.

    Anybody here who takes the time to write an insta, please post here, or send along a SA email.

    Reading Zero was a hoot today. Thanks for the heads up, HTL.

    "Whose on first?" Joseph: Completely caught off guard today, I was.

    Sprint down today? Weird.
    27 Aug 2010, 04:06 PM Reply Like
  • I also dislike the new front page format. The way it used to be, the people you tracked determined what was showing up... Now, the front page just shows the latest articles from anyone...

    So they now show content from the MEMBERS network as opposed to just your SOCIAL network defined by your tracking choices.

    You can still see the old tracking choices if you hit the tracking button at the very bottom of the SA page, just to the left of the inbox.

    The next question is why do you think they made that change?
    27 Aug 2010, 04:54 PM Reply Like
  • They want more hits on the Articles, and more exposure/links to those articles that will make the overall site look "bigger" to the greater web.

    We should probably be "Recommending" our instas - as well as "tweeting" and "facebooking" and "linking in" to geat the band.

    I bet they would love it if we also "dug" everything, etc, etc, ad nauseum.

    These things drive the math that earns them money from advertising, and bragging rights with the other major site op's.

    They love it when comments and articles include the latest hot search terms, too. I would imagine they might prefer I also used the term "Obama" rather than one of my psuedonyms like "Voldemort", though of course that would also mean that we would have much more frequent visits from trolls that spend their days searching the internet for "enemiesofBarack" to do battle.
    27 Aug 2010, 05:01 PM Reply Like
  • TB, you reminded me of something I thought of while I was sitting in traffic on Route 2 in Massachusetts during my vacation this last week.

    Who's gonna start the 'Renegades' Facebook page?
    27 Aug 2010, 05:19 PM Reply Like
  • I think you have hit the nail on the head. It's all about links and hits and making you troll through endless articles. I'm a pretty new subscriber and when I signed up, they automatically made me a follower of 20 authors to "get me started." I read 4 or 5 and found that none of them came near matching what I had filled in as my interests! I'm a conservative old guy; they signed me up for Kid Momentum or some such. I finally had to go through and remove all these one by one to start fresh. Also, does everyone get the nagware when they sign on to put in your favorite symbols? If I didn't want it the first 100 times I signed on, I'm probably not going to change my mind! But you're right -- it's all about the click-throughs. Too bad; with some of the great authors they get, this could be a class site that might grow slower but at least the "followers" would honestly care when the authors they want to read published something new.
    27 Aug 2010, 06:17 PM Reply Like
  • Paul: Welcome aboard!

    Most of us commenting in Quick Chat have been on SA for at least a year. One of my favorite contributors, John Petersen, emailed me a few months ago and was amazed how many new followers he was getting. He then learned that there was a shift in SA policy, to force all newbies to follow "selected" authors at the outset.

    Many of us Quick Chatters actually helped SA through it's nascent stages. Often I was contacted for my opinion, as much for ideas, as for commentary about SA changes. One of the things I know they were working on, which has yet to show up, is that they wanted to create something like Quick Chat. So far, that has yet to happen.

    One thing I would not be shy about is contacting SA. On the Home Page there are methods to do so, along with names of who is in charge of what department. I have found that SA is quite reponsive and professional when I have made contact.

    I'm not sure about the "nagware." That doesn't happen when I sign on. Maybe because I've been on SA for some time now.

    Right now, SA is going through an overhaul/update. I will be interested to learn/use the updates.

    One more suggestion, if I may be so forthright, and that would be to go through top contributors like John Lounsbury, to see who he is following.
    27 Aug 2010, 06:57 PM Reply Like
  • Thank you! I'll mostly watch and learn. Being a fly on the wall is often the quietest and best approach LOL
    27 Aug 2010, 09:09 PM Reply Like
  • Well, Paul, you've certainly come to one of the better places to learn. The Quick Chat (QC) forum is a unique, free-flowing of investing ideas and related information.

    One thing I should give you warning about is that we rarely call elected officials by their proper names here. The reason we do so is to ensure that those who we refer to as "trolls" (SA members who just give thumbs down to every comment for anyone who disagrees with their political views) cannot find us by using queries of those names. Please don't be offended by the apparent disrespect; it's necessary.

    The other thing about the QC is that even though we may sometime disagree on a topic, we always do so respectfully or in a kidding manner with no ill intent. We appreciate differing points of view on any subject because it helps us all to learn more by looking at things from all angles and perspectives. If everyone agrees on everything, we're not going to learn much from it.

    QCs are meant to be safe, entertaining, and (foremost) informative. So, pull up a chair, sit yourself down, and make yourself at home.
    28 Aug 2010, 09:11 AM Reply Like
  • Silentz - I think that this "is" the Renegade's Facebook page, or at least as close as we're likely to get to one.
    29 Aug 2010, 08:01 PM Reply Like
  • I'm getting out of all Brazilian investments. On Tuesday, a law was passed so that foreigners can't own land there. It may nullify ownership interests established as far back as 1988. There hasn't been real good coverage on this newest wrinkle.
    We may not see repercussions right away, but this can't be good for the cost of food long term, and I am surely distrustful of a govt takeover of PBR as an example.
    Lula resembles Chavez.
    27 Aug 2010, 05:02 PM Reply Like
  • Good to know. I have been wondering when that particular idea would start to spread.

    I wonder if Voldemort might try a version. After all, if its good enough for the Chinese...
    27 Aug 2010, 05:04 PM Reply Like
  • What does Pabst Blue Ribbon got to do with Brazil?
    27 Aug 2010, 06:54 PM Reply Like
  • Here's the link. Even though the author states the outcome is unlikely, I don't believe that for a minute. IMO, Brazil just lost its luster.
    www.alertnet.org/thene...

    How to play it: buy long term puts on the Brazilian etf's?
    27 Aug 2010, 05:06 PM Reply Like
  • I'd leave it alone, OG. Look at China. They have NEVER allowed foreigners to own land - even major tech corporations they are dying to attract end up minority investors in their own Chinese companies with hugely expensive new factories sitting on land they don't (and never will) own. This fact has been accepted by every Western company and investor I can think of.

    I would not bet against Brazil just based upon this. It would be hard to count on.
    27 Aug 2010, 05:46 PM Reply Like
  • You are right, Triple. If they do go back and nullify ownership interests that have been in place for years, that's a huge game changer. It will be interesting to see what Lula's replacement will do.
    27 Aug 2010, 06:39 PM Reply Like
  • Did you see how the Muslim Mosque at Ground Zero might be financed by tax free bonds?
    Here's the link:
    sweetness-light.com/ar...
    27 Aug 2010, 06:21 PM Reply Like
  • Where, oh, where are the "separate church from state" crowd when they're needed?

    Has anyone heard that a Greek Orthodox Church that was destroyed by a falling building at Ground Zero has had its petition to rebuild turned down? They had an approval for a much lower building, but decided to resubmit for a traditional building with a steeple that would have risen above the permitted level because it could obstruct the view of the Ground Zero Monument. That request was denied. Now the mosque, which is much taller, has been rushed through with all potential obstacles swept aside. What has happened to our country?
    27 Aug 2010, 07:03 PM Reply Like
  • (CPST): Not actionable, but a Russian news article suggesting that (CPST) might have a JV or fabrication facility there. Would be a long time coming, I would think, and certainly should not be done until CFP is achieved. Even then, the political stability and rule of law there s/b of some concern.

    investorshub.advfn.com...

    HardToLove
    27 Aug 2010, 06:31 PM Reply Like
  • And what appears to be an interview with a potential Russian partner?

    investorshub.advfn.com...

    It's an excerpt of a BPC Group interview and has a link to the complete interview.

    HardToLove
    28 Aug 2010, 01:36 PM Reply Like
  • What do you think, Natural gas students?
    How would you play this?

    seekingalpha.com/artic...
    28 Aug 2010, 12:33 AM Reply Like
  • I was just mulling over NG again. Last year I went long about now, and made excellent money, but prices now are running 10-42% higher than then. Less upward mobility, imo. BUT we are seeing the electric generation industry using more NG (up 8% yoy), and some slight gains in industrial consumption (up 1%, in line with my estimation that manufacturing is still really flat on its back, despite reports to the contrary). Pricing is therefor a bit rich, imo.

    This article's call for a $2 handle seems over-ambitious to me. At this point I start reading the same old global warming model predictions which tripped up the short side last winter.

    I'll not be going long right now, given my view that we are looking at a double dip come the winter, so I would agree with a short play, but NOT one based upon $2ng to succeed. Pricing closer to $2.40 might be more likely, although of course that is just a guesstimate.

    Going short in the middle ground should pay off, though, for option players.

    COULD prices go the other way? Yes, particularly if the Regime gets their collective heads unplugged and cancel their plans for a national socialist tax and destroy session in 2011. An economy which actually STARTS to recover could use a lot more NG, and upset this apple cart real quick. SHOULD the political plans alter drastically between now and Jan 1, shorts will have to be nimble to remain profitable. An early departure before the full force of winter hits might be in order.

    Given the wild state of flux, I would NOT think of any trade involving this area as "fire and forget".
    28 Aug 2010, 02:49 AM Reply Like
  • Elaborating on the theme, I've also been studying oil prices and view them as cheap (though they shot up late today of course). HOWEVER I do not subscribe to the long standing theory that the two very different fuel's price per output unit (therm/btu, etc) should trace in something approaching tandem. Like the old gold/silver link, I think the oil/NG relationship is no longer to be trusted as an assumption.
    28 Aug 2010, 03:12 AM Reply Like
  • The one possible glitch in NG, as we all know too well, is the potential for a hurricane. However, as TB pointed out in an earlier comment, this hurricane season has been very productive. But one can never tell what mother nature might throw at us. A short position does appear the best, and most likely winner, but then one must continually monitor for a potential storm that could shut down gulf production. Aside from that, this does seem like a year to be short NG. But my preference is to stay on the sidelines until I think we have bottomed in the sector and to pick up some NG RTs when they are totally out of favor. They're not quite there yet, IMHO. I think we will need to wait to see what winter really brings us and just how bad the economy gets during that time as well. When the economy shows better signs of turning upward or bottoming, I'll be looking in this area for some treasure.
    28 Aug 2010, 09:35 AM Reply Like
  • I agree. We have now had a total of 2 hurricanes, neither one major - one that hit Mexico, and now one wandering in the Atlantic ocean that has just been downgraded to a "minor hurricane" and is expected to pass to the east of Bermuda. This news will not act on fossil fuel prices.
    28 Aug 2010, 09:48 AM Reply Like
  • Is natural gas telling a different (worse) story about the state of industry than oil? The prices of the two are seldom as far apart as now; the oil price is usually about 10 times the natural gas price (the ratio of energy equivalence is only 6 to 1), not 18 to 1 or so.
    28 Aug 2010, 02:15 PM Reply Like
  • Yes. Its also a story about relative supplies - NG (unlike oil) supplies represent overwhelmingly current domestic production - whereas oil supplies are largely purchased imports. Comparing the two levels - ie, how much oil has been purchased in an environment of grossly disrupted domestic oil production vs strongly increasing domestic gas production capacity - apples and oranges are being examined.

    I am seeing the two once-linked commodities diverging onto very different paths, for many reasons.

    As much as the existing models try to maintain that link, errors in the numbers they generate will result.
    28 Aug 2010, 02:53 PM Reply Like
  • You need to forget that ratio. It's been broken a *long* time and will continue to be so as more and more NG wells are drilled to keep leases, storage remains on the high side and industrial/commercial use is off from the economy (not to mention lack of nasty weather).

    Add in that oil is international while NG is local and the ration is now about useless.

    HardToLove
    28 Aug 2010, 02:53 PM Reply Like
  • My guess is that the ratio will eventually be "fixed" (based on increasing energy conversion techniques).

    But maybe not for some time.
    28 Aug 2010, 03:08 PM Reply Like
  • townhall.com/columnist...

    Dick Morris is a political handicapper to follow. His insights into the finale 10 days before an election makes sense, and could be very important in the macro results. As we have been witnessing with the dramatic (if troubling) pronouncements from Jackson Hole yesterday, the markets are teetering on the edge of a knife.

    I believe it will soon be time to start making assumptions based upon a very different set of "objective political conditions" going forward. Downward performance and projections for defense and technology stocks like (RTN) and (HRS), for instance, might need to be recalculated. Companies engaged in the canceled Manned Space Program like Boeing (BA) and (COL) Rockwell Collins could see a change in fortune in a big way.

    "Infrastructure" in the 21st century is not limited to just the surface of the planet.
    28 Aug 2010, 10:13 AM Reply Like
  • Larry Kudlow talking politico-economic news, which is what he does best: townhall.com/columnist...

    Boehner standing tall and making with some interesting ideas?

    That's different.
    28 Aug 2010, 10:32 AM Reply Like
  • TB - I also listen carefully to Dick Morris as I believe he has excellent insight to the trends in politics. And from what he has been saying lately, it may make a huge difference in our assumptions about what the markets are likely to do next year.

    There are so many problems, especially at the state and local government levels, that I am having a hard time figuring out how any new Congress can do very much quickly enough to get unemployment down before the second half of the year. I also wonder still what the budget proposals will look like after the elections. I'm sure they have everything ready to push through once the elections are over, but they won't make anything public until then.

    A government that doesn't want you to know what they are planning is a dangerous thing.
    28 Aug 2010, 12:01 PM Reply Like
  • What am I thinking? Won't the best result we can expect be gridlock? If so, doesn't that likely just leave in force what in currently on the books other than what expires at year-end? So, if the current Congress has it in its mind to raise taxes before they lose control, it will just become law until it can be reversed after a Regime change in 2012. I'm thinking that gridlock within the beltway won't help the markets much after the initial euphoria melts away and reality of the situation sets in. Just my opinion. And I'd definitely like to hear what others think in case I'm missing something.
    28 Aug 2010, 12:52 PM Reply Like
  • This has been my working thesis for over a year, so you get no arguments from me.

    I DO believe that Obama will start out February 2011 with an active Veto pen - but there is an outside chance that, like Clinton in similar circumstances, his ego will not allow him to accept a full stop to his plans. Horsetrading might start to creep into the picture, which could make things interesting. IF the revolution is stronger than I expect, its possible that the Republicans will be in a position to overturn some Vetos... But I would not count on it.

    As for the days between November 2 and January 20...

    There is a reason why the lame duck is often considered the most dangerous beast in the political forest.
    28 Aug 2010, 01:39 PM Reply Like
  • “Gridlock in Congress means progress everywhere else; progress in Congress means gridlock everywhere else.”
    28 Aug 2010, 02:22 PM Reply Like
  • I'm just gonna throw this out there for the sake of argument. The Prez is a political chameleon. He has finely honed poltical instincts and his values are more tied to his ambitions than his head or heart. This is just my theory. This means he was a left of center candidate, talking about changing the partisan tone in washington, immigration reform, gays in the military, and even slipping in a reference to "spreading the wealth around". This played very well among those who would consider voting for him and he didn't really care how it played among those who votes he was just not going to get. Once he got in office, he redistributed wealth all right, but he did not so much "spread it around" and "spread it on thick" and helped push through a banker bailout at taxpayer expense. His cadre was now the dems and not the voter, so he pretty much painted within the lines of the their coloring book. This means he did not introduce immigration reform, he did not take the action he promised on gays in the military, he did not act as quickly as many thought he would (as it sounded like he would to many voters) about Iraq and Afghanistan. When he did act on these things, he was much more a party dem than the shake things up creative solution both sides of the aisle candidate he presented himself as. Why? Because political reality dictated his script.

    So where I am going with this? I think (again this is just a theory you can feel free to disagree with) that if/when there is a republican or at least more conservative makeup of congress, we will finally see "Mr. Across the Aisle" work his magic as he attempts to stay atop the surf board on the changing tide. If he has to sign things next year that he never would have signed last year, he'll call it being a realist and working with both parties. Here's the tricky part:

    Come 2012 he will have positioned himself as the candidate of change who fought the good fight with the dems (when they were in power) and reached across the aisle (when the republicans gained strength). In other words he will have played three distinct roles and will don whichever mask he needs to as the new presidential candidate in 2012 in order to ensure that he maintains a base of power.

    My theory won't ring true to anyone who believes the POTUS has been acting with singular purpose to promote the agenda he was elected on. I know a number of impatient and disillusioned liberals who assure me that they expected much more left in his on court play than they have seen. I attribute this to his being first and foremost a politician. He is Zelig. He will adopt the stripes of those around him in order to ensure he remains where he wants to be. If the electoral mood of the nation proves to be more conservative this fall as I think it will, presto we will see shades of this conservatism in the pres himself. That is my theory.

    This does not mean he becomes a conservative by any means. His coat of many colors simply takes on new shades, it does not change completely. But for those who watch this sort of thing, they will see a change in hue. And most importantly, they will see him front and center trying to gran credit for things he never would have uttered in the 2008 campaign.
    28 Aug 2010, 03:24 PM Reply Like
  • <He is Zelig.> LOL!
    DM, you're description of Obama is accurate, and resembles Bill Clinton's first term when he realized that he would have to move toward the middle to make a second term. But here is the difference:
    Clinton was shot down by Congress. They didn't go for Hilary's health plan, as an example. The country said" NO" to Clinton, and the congress listened to its constituents.
    Here, we have the Dems (even those you wouldn't ordinarily consider progressives) that pushed thru these overwhelming (and awful) changes. I would not have lumped Harry Reid as a progressive prior to Obama's taking office. I'd not have put him in the same class as Nancy Pelosi, for instance. But, he succumbed.
    Yet, he is back in the saddle and may very well return for another Senate term.
    Same thing with Obama, at this point, it is far from clear that we won't have him for 8 years.
    Politicians live for re-election. That is every politician's #1 priority.
    If the Republicans run another lame presidential campaign, with a McCain type, it will make it even easier for the democrats to run Obama again.
    28 Aug 2010, 04:48 PM Reply Like
  • I screwed up my conclusion and can't edit it further.
    So, yes, Obama can easily cross the aisle should the make up of congress change in November, and force him to work with the republicans.
    28 Aug 2010, 04:59 PM Reply Like
  • (CPST): Some pictures taken at the shareholders meetin of the Lincvolt, an HEV truck and the CMT-380. Also a few pictures around the plants.

    investorshub.advfn.com...

    HardToLove
    28 Aug 2010, 02:55 PM Reply Like
  • I am long COP as part of my long term portfolio. I am thinking if Nat Gas really falls that much,I will add to COP.
    28 Aug 2010, 03:22 PM Reply Like
  • I have this unproven ( to me) theory that COP is more reactive to nat gas news than some of the other oil majors, all of them have nat gas positions, of course. I've never put a COP chart up against a crude and nat gas chart, and compared that to, say XOM. Anyone know how to do it? (I'm still a simpleton when it comes to basic computer skills.)
    28 Aug 2010, 04:56 PM Reply Like
  • I got out of COP (around 50), but am looking for a chance to get back in.

    Warren Buffett reportedly got out, but this is not the investment he understands best.
    29 Aug 2010, 09:45 AM Reply Like
  • Please pardon if you have already discussed Schiller's forecast of 50%chance for double dip, and deflation. Here's the link, and if you go toward the right and hit the video, it's pretty entertaining. For one thing, Schiller doesn't see a bond bubble in the making.
    finance.yahoo.com/fami...
    28 Aug 2010, 05:14 PM Reply Like
  • My "conviction" political scenario for the next 6 months:

    1. Present through Nov elections:

    A. Increasingly desperate Democrats attempt to identify and issue sufficient bribes to the same voter base that swept them into office to insure a repeat performance. The recent teacher/public employee job bill is a good example. This went through the house no problem, and passed cloture in the Senate. Other versions, targeting similar groups, will also pass. Having solidified their hold on their core constituency, they will seek to expand the list to include large groups that are becoming restive, such as urban inhabitants. Aid programs will be rapidly cobbled together for cities to backfill budget deficits and retain large employee bases on the city payroll. State programs will be HINTED, but are likely to be delayed due to compexity, time constraints, and the fact that they are much harder to limit to likely Democrat voters.

    B. Massive "Rebuild America" project will be announced, as an umbrella program under which the mountains of pork already authorized in the StimBills, ObamaCare and the various huge Budget Bills are combined with an all new wish list. Areas of the economy that already have large trust funds will be "included", such as highways, national airport funds, superfund cleanups, and various industries where pensions have been shifted from private to public responsibility. Funds from the underlying trusts will be admixed to create the seed corn for the new pork projects, whether the new agenda has anything to do with the targeted taxes and user fees which created the trusts or not.

    C. FDR's bag of tricks will be revisited. National parks, highways, railways, and iternet access will be revamped. FDR's Conservation Corps will be reinvented and tasked with a multitude of repair and maintenance projects around the country, many of the jobs literally make-work. The Childcare industry will be subsumed en toto into the Federal Government. Job training will become a "right" of every American.

    Despite all this, and more which I cannot imagine, I expect the Republicans to crush the Democrats in the coming elections. They will regain control of the House, and pick up 6 or 7 (outside chance at 8) Senate seats. Some are calling for a debacle for the Democrats in the senate, with them losing 10 or 11 seats, but I find that concept to be unlikely.

    2. November thru Jan 20: The Lame Ducks invade Washington DC.

    A. Any of the legislation listed above which is NOT enacted prior to the election will be enacted during the Lame Duck session. Sore losers among the Democrats, energized by the chance to use their massive majority power one more time before it vanishes in January, vote in the Liberal wish list.

    B. Cap and Trade becomes the law of the land, via rescission in the Senate. The Republicans promise to repeal it when they take power in January, but if they do not reclaim power in the Senate, they will fail, and even if they did repeal it, the President would veto the repeal legislation.

    C. Card Check and assorted programs much sought after by organized labor will be passed, again via rescission if need be. Again the Republicans will vow to repeal. Again they will probably fail, and even if they succeed, face a Presidential veto.

    D. New trade legislation will be created deeding wide powers and latitude to the Executive branch to make trade policy.

    3. Jan 1 - end of Q2: The Double Dip. Assuming the prior events take place, the nation will enter another recession toward the end of Q1, though later analysis may disclose that it actually entered recession in Q4 2010 or even earlier - or never left recession in the first place.
    28 Aug 2010, 05:27 PM Reply Like
  • THe lay off kings: (Buffet made the list):
    www.dailyfinance.com/s.../

    The first victims of healthcare reform:
    www.time.com/time/nati...
    28 Aug 2010, 05:45 PM Reply Like
  • Health care reform will lead to layoffs. The two articles are of the same piece.

    "Be careful what you wish for."
    31 Aug 2010, 11:33 AM Reply Like
  • Fascinating article: Are Americans De-Banking?
    money.cnn.com/2010/08/...
    28 Aug 2010, 06:11 PM Reply Like
  • It's called "putting your money under a mattress."

    Like the 1930s.

    For essentially the same reasons (bank chicanery reached all time highs in the 1920s, until the recent go-around).
    31 Aug 2010, 11:27 AM Reply Like
  • Here's another interesting short article on huge tech gambles ( I can't sleep but I can read and share- the IBM play is the best of the lot, imo):
    <IBM says this is no Garry Kasparov-beating gimmick. The company believes it has found the true Holy Grail of automated search: a computer that understands everyday human speech, and a system that it can sell to its clients.>

    money.cnn.com/gallerie...
    29 Aug 2010, 02:06 AM Reply Like
  • Star Trek stuff. Beyond voice commands, closer to a conversation, next stop: AI.
    29 Aug 2010, 03:10 AM Reply Like
  • I have done a lot of reading on Artificial Intelligence through the years, and for a while it was a hobby of mine. Probably the most interesting gem I retained was that AI would have some consequences not generally appreciated. A true artificial intelligence would be just as prone to distraction and mood as we are. This means that you could ask "What's the square root of 1300?" to an AI machine and get the response "With all that's going on in the middle east right now, you want to know the square root of 1300? Use a calculator, I'm busy."

    In other words some of the very things that AI would be expected to improve early on (like air traffic controlling, since dealing with a crisis requires higher level thinking thought to be resolvable by AI) would be subject to the imperfections of time management and "emotional" content (or at least perceptual noise) not unlike today's human components in these systems.

    The closer we get to actually modeling intelligence, the less we will be able to predict about its actions. For a silly but pertinent example, think of Herbie the Love Bug. A car so smart it could drive itself. Yet it did not always drive where its occupants wanted to go...

    Fascinating stuff, AI.
    29 Aug 2010, 12:26 PM Reply Like
  • Some of you are probably aware that there are special rules for 2010 about converting from a conventional IRA to a Roth IRA, with taxes payable in 2011 and 2012. (Thanks, President Bush; the remnants of some of the good things he did are with us, still).
    Nothing replaces a good accountant, but I found this website that really helps explain some of the issues and rationale to consider this.
    Here's a snippet from the website:
    <New Roth IRA Rules for 2010

    Starting in 2010, the existing $100,000 income test for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA no longer applies. Conversions that occur in 2010 will be able to have half of the taxable converted amount taxed in 2011 and the other half taxed in 2012. (On May 17, 2006, President Bush signed the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 into law. This tax bill included a provision dealing with conversions of traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs.) Since Roth conversions increase tax revenues, it seems unlikely that the previous income ceiling will be reinstated anytime soon.>
    Here 's the link:
    www.rothira.com/

    Any thoughts on this are most welcome!
    29 Aug 2010, 02:25 AM Reply Like
  • Roths are fantastic deals for the younger folk. Earnings accumulate tax free. There was mention last session in Congress that they might do away with Roths (something was buried in the Obamacare debate, I can't remember, yes, it IS early in the morning, Ms. OG).

    Coverdells are also some darn good options, but I also dimly recall they were recently degraded or attacked.
    29 Aug 2010, 03:14 AM Reply Like
  • I'm going to call my accountant next week. I think it says you can take out some $ from an IRA now ( for those who are 59.5+) by converting that portion into the Roth in 2010, paying the tax at the 2010 rate, but in 2011 and 2012. But again, that's how I'm reading it and not necessarily what it says... So, for someone taking distributions, it may be helpful. Especially if taxes are going to be uber hiked in the next 2 years.
    29 Aug 2010, 03:29 AM Reply Like
  • Can't hurt running the numbers.

    The BIG advantage is for those who can let the money grow and the earnings compound for a few decades. I helped setup these for my younger brothers and one of my nephews. None of them have a retirement plan through their jobs.

    In my nephew's case it was a hard sale. When I showed him that just $25 per week would give him a nestegg of over $3million almost tax free by retirement, he finally agreed. The young all think they are going to live forever, of course.
    29 Aug 2010, 09:53 AM Reply Like
  • Too much was buried in the Obama health care debate. That scares me more than health care or the debate itself.
    31 Aug 2010, 11:26 AM Reply Like
  • Times article on billionaires financing the Tea Party, with an even more interesting Rupert Murdoch twist at the article end:

    www.nytimes.com/2010/0...
    29 Aug 2010, 03:38 PM Reply Like
  • LOL, the usual NYT nonsense.

    Having participated in several of these, I can say with authority that the attendees serve no such masters - pay their way to and from - pay for their own meals and hotel rooms - create their own signs, banners and supplies - and promote their own agendas, some rather odd, and many centrist rather than right wing.

    Better this airhead should actually attend some of these events, and spend some time talking to the citizens...

    Ah, but then how to "shape public opinion"?
    29 Aug 2010, 04:04 PM Reply Like
  • Maya, that is a really interesting article, thanks for posting it. Even though the author is dripping with sarcasm and slanted against the Koch brothers, I think they are my new heros.
    29 Aug 2010, 03:57 PM Reply Like
  • I thought the article had a certain "kitschy" flavor. Would love to know what Murdoch thinks of having a potential terrorist funder as a major shareholder.
    29 Aug 2010, 05:23 PM Reply Like
  • I remember in 2008, toward the end of the election cycle, when Ron Paul was told that Soros had contributed several thousand dollars to his campaign. This came just after the scandals involving millions donated to Clinton and Obama - in which both campaigns shame-facedly scurried around doing damage control, promptly segregated those monies from their primary campaign coffers, and began obscuring the obvious and troubling connection with the donors.

    Paul just laughed at the accusation that he was now a paid stooge for Soros, and promised to "...spend the money on a message Soros will hate". Given that Paul's message WAS anathema to Soros' ideology, you can only figure that Soros' dirty trick stratagem failed miserably.

    Anyone who operates a publicly traded company lacks the ability to pick and choose every one of their stockholders. I imagine Murdock's reaction is the same as Paul's. I know my reaction would be: "I hope ALL my enemies put money in my stock - I should be so lucky". LOL.
    30 Aug 2010, 09:16 AM Reply Like
  • I bet anything Murdoch has a thick dossier on his biggest investor .
    29 Aug 2010, 05:38 PM Reply Like
  • I'm wearing a black armband today for the once-proud, once-essential New York Times. It always had a liberal bias, but so what? It provided me with food for thought to challenge what I saw all around me, providing the "other side" of the argument. I still have fond memories of living in New York with the Sunday NYT spread all around the living room. But today it has become so shrill that it places items like this smear piece in the "Op-Ed" section so they can say self-righteously, "Well, WE didn't write it. We just believe in giving equal voice to all." How disingenuous. How sad. I mourn the passing of a once-fine newspaper with once-fine reporters and once-fine ethics.
    29 Aug 2010, 07:43 PM Reply Like
  • Agreed! The only reason I read the Sunday Times is because it is *still* free.

    We should start the, "Renegade Rescue."
    29 Aug 2010, 08:21 PM Reply Like
  • A number of contributors to the QC have expressed concerns about the virulence and smarminess of a lame-duck Congress bent on extracting revenge on voters who toss them out on their ear for not listening to their constituents and voting the party line or the lobbyists' line to the detriment of those constituents.

    I am hoping for a slightly different lame-duck session. Those incumbents tossed out, who couldn't get an honest job if they bought one (they can still become million dollar a year lobbyists; I did qualify it by saying an "honest" job), may indeed be bitter at being scorned. However --

    Their peers who were re-elected by the hair of their porky little chinny-chin-chins know that their constituents are watching them like hawks, as will be the new members who know they were elected primarily because of the excesses of the incumbents. If these current members hope to retain or secure a committee chairmanship or a leadership role at all, I think they will have to show uncharacteristic forbearance. They won't like it, but it might be easier to say, "Mr. President, you understand I'm between a rock and a hard spot. Let's let things settle down for 6 months while I mend fences back in my home district," rather than "Hell, *I* escaped the voters' wrath. Let's ram these bills the people don't want down their throats while we can."

    I say both outcomes are possible and right now its 50-50. Which way this cat jumps will depend on how big a scare these members get on the first Tuesday in November.
    29 Aug 2010, 07:54 PM Reply Like
  • You might be right, Joseph, in fact I really HOPE you are...

    But the Democrats you mention as being elected by slim margins will have no hope of retaining chairmanships or overall leadership - those will all shift to the "other guys".

    During the lame duck season, power will shift VERY strongly toward the White House. Politicians who, as you so correctly point out, will have dim prospects other than trading on their good relations with the government they are about to leave, will be very eager to please their prospective new benefactor. Bereft of any nagging wisps of concern about re-election and the opinions of their constitutents, their attention will re-orient like a magnetic compass on the nearest and largest concentration of political patronage.

    This will be the earliest and best test of the concept that Voldemort will "do a Clinton" and modify his ideology to align with the shifting political winds.

    I have based my investment philosophy upon the idea that he will NOT shift his stand much, if any. In fact, I will be surprised if this election does not push him further Left (or at least, unmask the poliitcal camouflage to reveal a corner of the hard core beneath).
    30 Aug 2010, 09:31 AM Reply Like
  • TB & DM - I have to side with TB on this one (nothing personal, DM), although I, too, hope DM is right. But next to power the one thing that career politicians want is more money, personally. Those who win by a whisker may very well be lining up jobs to start in 2012 as they become leery of their prospects. Lobbyist and consultants will take them into their fold for the contacts they have and as reward for helping to pass desired legislation that will benefit the interests of their new employer-to-be, IMHO. It's a win-win for them as they can get revenge while also assuring themselves of a huge raise after the 2012 elections. Many will likely decide not to run again and, instead, leave elected office for personal reasons while backing someone back in their old district who, if elected, they can influence.
    30 Aug 2010, 10:42 AM Reply Like
  • I won't take it personally, since it was Joseph Shaefer ;)
    30 Aug 2010, 02:39 PM Reply Like
  • Please see my first instablog, brought about by some of the smack that the NYT article was talking...

    seekingalpha.com/insta...
    29 Aug 2010, 08:19 PM Reply Like
  • www.zerohedge.com/arti...

    SmartknowledgeU on whether we have a bond bubble smartly asks the question.....is what we are seeing representative of rates a free market economy would set.
    30 Aug 2010, 07:56 AM Reply Like
  • Looks like China may be the big mover into electric vehicles?

    www.businesswire.com/n...

    HardToLove
    30 Aug 2010, 08:56 AM Reply Like
  • There's a logical base to the idea that China would present THE major market for inexpensive all-electric vehicles. Some of the strongest drawbacks for these vehicles revolve around the lack of operating radius. A 30 or 40 mile operating range suits a dedicated and congested urban environment best, and who has MORE of that particular terrain than China?
    30 Aug 2010, 09:37 AM Reply Like
  • China has LNG running vehicles already. Even they are ahead of the curve. As for electric cars, I'd bet on Japan first although the rare earth materials to build it will come from China.
    30 Aug 2010, 10:18 AM Reply Like
  • china also has hydrogen, diesel, cng, electric and hybrids of all sorts already up and running.

    They are experimenting with everything but have not decided on a standard yet.

    The Buses ferrying people during the Olympics were All Electrics.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:19 AM Reply Like
  • I have the next instblog ready to publish, but for some reason none of the SA buttons are working for me and it won't publish. The usual button (like Tracking and Inbox) are not even showing up on the SA home page. And from the home page there is no longer a button to look at the articles, comments, or instas by those I follow. I have to ho into another article to get any of those buttons to show up at the bottom of the page now. Is this what everyone is experiencing? I use FireFox.

    HTL - As I recall you also are a FireFox user. How have you dealt with this change?
    30 Aug 2010, 10:56 AM Reply Like
  • I'm experiencing no problems for what I do.

    One thing to try is logout, restart your browser, and log back in.

    Before that, try clearing the cache and maybe temporary files.

    To mail SA, you can use your normal mail program and send to support@seekingalpha.com

    HTH
    HardToLove
    30 Aug 2010, 11:20 AM Reply Like
  • Try control+shift+R.
    30 Aug 2010, 12:26 PM Reply Like
  • I can't even use the "send a message" button to contact SA about the problem! This is frustrating.
    30 Aug 2010, 10:59 AM Reply Like
  • have a stock for your perusal, hoping for a drop in it.

    Funtalk, fantastic chart, growing rapidly, sells Cell phones.

    FTLK, seems like the Chinese sellers treat Cell phones like commodities. They break, go buy another.

    FTLK gives warranties and provides repair service themselves.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:29 AM Reply Like
  • Was last Friday a Dead Cat bounce?

    IMO, ye, just a bounce in an oversold market.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:31 AM Reply Like
  • www.telegraph.co.uk/fi...

    Looks like the REE situation is finally creeping into the mainstream media. I fully expect it to jump to the forefront with some headlines like:

    >> "No Big Screens or Computers This Christmas". Sony and other major manufacturers are closing factories and laying off workers worldwide due to lack of key raw materials which China is stockpiling while the rest of the planet goes without. Although still available on the open market outside china at prices hundreds of times higher than the official "list price" set by the Chinese cartel which controls 97% of the world production of Rare Earth materials, the prices are so high that manufacturers cannot compete with the Chinese companies still making these items.

    Whatever stock appears in the stores this Christmas will all share one thing in common: They will all say "Made In China". <<

    LOL, or something to that effect. Until Apple closes up shop and the whole planet gets a wake-up call, it just doesn't penetrate the fog. Shoot, even the dumbest dinosaurs evolved a second crude brain so that they could react to something biting them on the butt BEFORE they died from sheer stupidity.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:33 AM Reply Like
  • I would hazzard a guess that the Koreans Will Not suffer from any REE shortages.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:41 AM Reply Like
  • (LYSCF.PK) Up 5.68%, (GWMGF.PK) up 6.25%, (MCP) up .13%, while (HUDRF.PK) and (GDLNF.PK) are flat.

    Ree's showing moderate strength this morning.

    Gold/silver miners are doing well overall, up slightly.

    (SLW) is up .69%.

    (TWM) is up 2.13%.

    I'm making good money so far today, we'll see how it goes.
    30 Aug 2010, 11:54 AM Reply Like
  • (GWMGF.PK) just took off like a scalded dog. Hit $.29, has settled at $.28 for now, up 12.92%.
    30 Aug 2010, 12:31 PM Reply Like
  • www.stratfor.com/analy...

    Amazing story about China's banking crisis - some wild numbers thrown around about American tbills - and just maybe the top central bank governor in China is now a political defector?

    A must read, though who knows how it will all shake out?
    30 Aug 2010, 12:41 PM Reply Like
  • Strange story... how could he loose money with t-bills? I wonder if its what I call a flyer story... mis-information designed to favor a particular play...
    30 Aug 2010, 02:13 PM Reply Like
  • I've seen analyses that take assumptions of earnings, and then folks look at the potential, future earnings - choose to bail early, paying fees and taking damage - and then wonder how come the promised earnings didn't materialize.
    30 Aug 2010, 05:11 PM Reply Like
  • Freya,

    Thanks for the offer. I tried to reply to your message but the button wouldn't work there either. So, I'm putting it up in the only way that still works for me: comments.

    Hopefully I'll get back the ability to post a QC again before we need it in again in a couple of days. Here is the list of symbols along with the intro paragraph I usually use. You can make any changes to the intro you deem appropriate. Thanks again!

    OG has asked me to take over responsibility for the Quick Chats so that she can sort out some personal things. OG will be back with us soon after her hiatus.. At that time she will resume posting QC Instablogs. Until then, I will be your host. Please be respectful and enjoy the liberty of this space.

    List of stocks mentioned in QC #95:

    (ARU), (BA), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (GWMGF.PK), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (HURDF.PK), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...), (seekingalpha.com/symbo...).

    If you'd prefer, I can copy the last comment into the new insta and create the comment here with the link to the new one. However you would like to proceed. I'm just grateful for your offer.
    30 Aug 2010, 02:27 PM Reply Like
  • Freya - I switched computers and it looks like I'll be able to create the new QC. Thanks again for the offer.
    30 Aug 2010, 06:47 PM Reply Like
  • Well, I spoke too soon. The post didn't take on my other computer either and I run IE on it while I have Firefox on the other. Neither works. So, I guess I'll send a message to support at SA and see if they have a lock on my account for some reason.
    30 Aug 2010, 07:57 PM Reply Like
  • If you believe in the constitution, be careful of the terminology that you use. The DOJ has listed such as "constitutionalist" and "survivalist" alongside terrorist groups in a guide recently published. Although they don't mark these as certain indicators of illegal activities, you know how things often work out in the long run.

    www.blacklistednews.co...

    HardToLove
    30 Aug 2010, 05:14 PM Reply Like
  • Sounds like it could become a 1950's style witch hunt.
    30 Aug 2010, 06:47 PM Reply Like
  • Yep. Just call me "Turtle McCarthy".

    A = A, y'all.
    30 Aug 2010, 07:48 PM Reply Like
  • Doug Short has some updated interesting charts from the Consumer Metrics Institute today. Scroll down to the CMI heading and look at the 4 charts, especially the fourth one.

    www.dshort.com/

    HardToLove

    P.S. read the article following that one too, about revised earnings estimates and whether or not the market is currently overvalued.
    30 Aug 2010, 05:21 PM Reply Like
  • Excellent piece of analysis there, HTL!

    I like the Growth Index, and in particular I like it because it has been developed to utilize the current data set works on a logical base which still works. I trust it over the S&P predictions, which I feel are moving in the wrong direction altogether.

    I share the author's skepticism about 2011, or even the near term Q4 results.

    Drawing on some scrap paper my own rough curves (hey' I'm a graphic artist, its what I do), it appears we may be near a QI low, which will soon reverse course, resulting in some really nasty S&P numbers over the next 3-6 months...
    30 Aug 2010, 05:49 PM Reply Like
  • I like those charts, too, HTL. I especially like the 4th one with the overhead and supporting trend lines. There will be a break out soon, and there just isn't anything of consequence out there to justify a break out to the upside (at least not yet).
    30 Aug 2010, 08:26 PM Reply Like
  • Anyone got some tea? Alaska seems to have some brewing.

    newsblaze.com/story/20...

    But it's a tight race.

    news.blogs.cnn.com/201.../

    HardToLove
    30 Aug 2010, 05:36 PM Reply Like
  • HTL: Same goes here in PA. Toomey (R) ahead of Sestak (D) in vying for Sector's seat.

    Also, great (link to) charts above! Thanks.
    30 Aug 2010, 06:49 PM Reply Like
  • I called Toomey the winner in PA after the primary.

    Alaska should still pick the Republican, but it will stay close right up to the end.

    I have increased my estimate for Repub. gains in the US Senate from 4-5 to 6, maybe 7. Some handicappers go as high as 11, but they are really ambitious.
    30 Aug 2010, 08:08 PM Reply Like
  • Mark: FYI--- On my PC XP, everything seems to be operating normally (though I haven't attempted to create an Insta, or send a SA email).

    On my Vista laptop, I can't send a SA email, nor do I see the tool bar. I have to open up any article, then up pops the tool bar at the bottom of the page. I tried to write OG a SA email yesterday, accessed Inbox, constructed an email, but Send was stuck.

    I don't use Mozilla on either; have MSN as my default home page on both puters. (You can tell by this I'm not a puter geek!)

    Maybe someone else should start the next QC Insta?
    30 Aug 2010, 09:11 PM Reply Like
  • (JAG) announced Ceate Mine first pouring today. Estimate is to be 10,000 ounces during Q3 2010, and 20,000 ounces during Q4, possibly translating to 80,000 ounces during 2011. I read in their quarterly report that Jaguar expects this to be bananza grade north of 8 grams per tonne.

    No after hours action.
    30 Aug 2010, 10:04 PM Reply Like
  • Maya, did you ever post what your broker had to say?

    If so, where?
    31 Aug 2010, 07:01 AM Reply Like
  • Let me go find it, and haul it in here. Here we go (taken from QC #89):

    ####

    Toe in the REE pond today with Molycorp.

    Overall, and after a looooong conversation with my broker, I am going to stand pat, and not buy anything in the brokerage account until at the earliest, the middle of the fall season. Not going to be real aggressive with the gamer account either.

    Here's a key point, which I believe Triple and others have been making. If the republicans gain control of the House in November, I will be buying the next day. If the blue dog dems somehow maintain control, I will be shorting the market.

    Following are some other points discussed, not priortized.

    Of course, if Israel decides enough is enough and bombs Iran in September, then I'm plunging into oil stocks. Is there something sneaking around about this I've been oblivious to during my extended trip? (Note: I was in Honduras for two months, Eric)

    All the negative thoughts about housing, for me, are beginning to become more market related, than nationally related. I was beginning to see this months ago. Outside of Phoenix, Case Shiller has housing on a rebound in cities like Mesa and Glendale. Saramento is up huge in valuations, and San Francisco has also improved. Of course, there still is Chicago, and other markets, which will continue to slide. Broker said there was an article today on page two of the WSJ (though it could have been The Financial Times?)

    So we have some improvements in some areas where KB Homes have been built, and also in areas where Wachovia/Wells has a lot of mortgages underwater. QE2 may add further help in these markets that are apparently rebounding. The big point from all of this is that "sytematic risk" in housing is off the table. What the government should do, according to my very conservative broker, and this is contrary to my innate beliefs, is to increase the expired tax break of $8500 to $15000. Clear the inventory as fast as possible.

    Here are some sectors that are doing well over the past couple of quarters:

    Farming (thanks Russia!)
    Airlines
    Exports (although recent numbers indicate a pullback)
    Advertising agencies

    GM and Ford auto sales skyrocketing in China. Domestically, Ford is NOT trying to meet demand with their popular Escort and Escape models. Sales in those models are on the upswing, and Ford has decided to let the dealers scream for inventory, rather than over produce.

    Broker expects oil inventory to build out for the rest of this year, but long term, oil is a must have in any portfolio.

    Teachers' pensions are growing logrhythmically, putting a stranglehold on many states. Expect the consolidation of school districts to reduce administration costs to the district's taxpayers. The education bill (in the House right now?) is merely a subsidy that forces states to commit to spending for two years, exacerbating, putting off the pension problems.

    All in all, it seems like we're still in a period of volatility, and this will continue for a long, long time. Interest rates are going to remain low for at least three or four years. Inflation is far away. China will continue to gain in dominance. Sooner or later the dollar will wane, but I expect later than sooner.
    31 Aug 2010, 10:00 AM Reply Like
  • Pinetree has filed to repurchase up to 5 million of its shares on the open market.
    31 Aug 2010, 07:03 AM Reply Like
  • Insider purchases at HDY and NVAX.

    Heavy Insider Sales at IPI: 2 1.2 million blocks on the recent runup due to the POT offer.
    31 Aug 2010, 07:06 AM Reply Like
  • Freya: One thing I want to revise in the above broker's conversation is that I heard that October 6th is the day the markets typically take off before election season. So, I will be buying before November 2nd (likely, that is).
    31 Aug 2010, 10:03 AM Reply Like
  • Tankers & (NAT): Tankers used for storage lessening as contoango flattens. Tankers heavily exposed to spot prices likely going to suffer.

    www.intertanko.com/tem...

    HardToLove
    31 Aug 2010, 10:16 AM Reply Like
  • (CPST): +3.7%, looks to continue up right now - but it's early. Does however fit my thoughts last week that it was making a bottom and, of course, the shorts had a lot of days to cover.

    HardToLove
    31 Aug 2010, 10:18 AM Reply Like
  • (LYSCF.PK) is down 2.2%, while (GWMGF.PK) is up 3.62%. (MCP) is up 4.24%. So the REE's are showing some gains, except for Australia, which is expected (those markets are still averaging in the new Carbon Taxes - about 9% economy-wide haircut, initially).

    Gold is up, and (SLW) is up 1.79%.

    Oil is up slightly, and my RT's just edged higher as well.

    Markets were down, but have reversed course (slightly positive now) due to the Consumer Confidence increase. Why this surprised I really don't know, after the Fed promised their new policy of "QE forever, and yes, we're going to buy equities too", what else would we expect? Over 50% of all consumers are now dependent on government handouts, so news of more pork and gravy SHOULD be greeted by jubilation from the proletariat masses.

    Interesting that the markets are responding AFTER the very predictable news, but were in freefall before. The predictive power of the markets seems to be severely compromised - and also appears to be reflecting the profoundly low volumes and lack of retail investor participation. The more its all about Da Boyz, the less its about the American economy...
    31 Aug 2010, 10:35 AM Reply Like
  • I just read an article about NG prices and it doesn't look good for the next 18 months as gas operators continue to drill and production is increasing.

    seekingalpha.com/artic...
    31 Aug 2010, 11:04 AM Reply Like
  • Several months back, an SA reader PM'd me asking what I thought was going to happen with prices. I said then they would continue to tank.

    I see nothing to change that.

    HardToLove
    31 Aug 2010, 11:11 AM Reply Like
  • You are my pied piper when it comes to NG. You play your flute, I'll follow...
    31 Aug 2010, 12:37 PM Reply Like
  • Hurricane Earl, and the East Coast Refiners that could be impacted by this Category 4 storm:
    www.reuters.com/articl...
    31 Aug 2010, 12:21 PM Reply Like
  • Its been a long while since we were tagged by a Hurricane. Has to happen again some day.
    31 Aug 2010, 12:24 PM Reply Like
  • [A hurricane] "has to happen again some day."

    But hopefully not today.
    31 Aug 2010, 12:43 PM Reply Like
  • I assume you all saw the idiocy EPA and Transportation are trying to foist upon us now (in today's "Wall Street Breakfast" if you didn't see it elsewhere) by grading cars based upon their fuel efficiency and their carbon emissions. Good in theory, like so many bureaucrat-for-life ideas, but STUPID in practice, with no thought of ripple effect, law of unintended consequences, ecologist Garrett Hardin's brilliant, “We can never do merely one thing,” or any CONCEPT of the economic consequences.

    Got me so fired up that halfway through writing a comment I decided it deserved an Instablog instead.

    Lord, deliver us from well-meaning numbskulls...
    31 Aug 2010, 02:23 PM Reply Like
  • Everyone remembers "Catch 22", right? Essentially, its a law or regulation that guarantees you are screwed. No escape.

    FinReg has now been with us several months, and I'm beginning to see its Catch 22 core.

    I'm not one of those folks who lives on credit cards. Fact is, I pay them off each month, and have for years. They are there for my convenience, not so that the banks can get rich...

    So imagine my incredulity when I start getting notices from each of them that my credit limits have been reduced because I have too much credit. NOT that I owe too much, oh no, but that I have too much credit available.

    So OK, I think at first, I never use those high limits anyway...

    Then a month goes by, and I get ANOTHER notice, same logic, same result...

    Another month, ANOTHER notice...

    Vicious downward spiral.

    Far as I can tell, its a simple forumula:

    FinReg = Tighter Credit Standards, then:

    FinReg + Tighter Credit Standards = Reduced Credit, then:

    Reduced Credit = Lower Credit Score (this happens as a result of all that went before), then:

    Lower Credit Score + FinReg = Further Reduced Credit, then:

    Reduced Credit = Lower Credit Score (and by this time, everyone sees the pattern).

    Now, I have no yen to borrow money, I'm past that nonsense, but expanding this odd phenomenon outward to the rest of the country, it starts to eplain some things...

    Hard to see how a consumer-driven economy will show anything but a large crater when the rules are rigged to penalize you for NOT borrowing, and to make sure eventually that you CAN'T.

    Catch 22. Minderbinder would be proud.
    31 Aug 2010, 02:32 PM Reply Like
  • Am experiencing some of Mark's problems, but on a trial and error basis, if you click your own name first, you are able to access the Insta creation Box.

    Quick Chat # 96:

    seekingalpha.com/insta...

    has the symbols from QC # 95 as provided by Mark Bern.
    31 Aug 2010, 02:42 PM Reply Like
  • When I click onto Freya's blog, I get a blank page with no comments. I can't post an insta, I can't update stuff. I SA fixes this mess.
    Here's an article on Dan Loeb's letter to his hedge fund particants, the whole system is rigged:
    finance.yahoo.com/tech...=
    31 Aug 2010, 04:33 PM Reply Like
  • AMEN!

    HardToLove
    31 Aug 2010, 04:50 PM Reply Like
  • Loeb is a smart and brave man. He has my support.
    31 Aug 2010, 04:52 PM Reply Like
  • I just posted on Oygee's, err...Mark's, err...Freya's Quick Chat 96. Using PC XP to do so.

    I'll provide a link to see if that helps, OG: (It worked, for me)

    seekingalpha.com/insta...
    31 Aug 2010, 05:23 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.