Richard is a principal of QVM Group LLC (http://www.qvmgroup.com/QVMinvest/), a fee-based investment advisor based in Connecticut with clients across the country. He provides investment coaching to "do-it-yourself" investors, and manages portfolios for those who prefer not to make... More
What do you get when you want yield that is growing along with sales and earnings over a period of years, less than sky high valuation, and evidence of a rising price pattern?
The answer today is not very many stocks, and not necessarily the most exciting names. Not every exploration finds gold. Some of the results of this search are interesting, but we aren’t crying eureka.
ETFs were not included in this study of individual stocks listed on US exchanges.
Negative or neutral results can also be informative, however, for those who seek more than tips and immediate gratification.
The results are not recommendations, just the result of an exploration. We had hoped for a more exciting list, but what comes out is what comes out.
It is probably an example of asking for too much — as the saying goes, you can have anything you want, but not everything your want. Sometimes the stocks you want are going up, and sometimes the stocks going up aren’t the ones you want.
Ideally, the stocks you want for fundamental reasons are also going up in price.
Defining “going up” is a matter of investment time horizon and how much comfort you want that the price movement is actually upward. The criteria we used are fairly conservative.
If you are curious about how and what, read on.
What We Did:
We screened our fundamental stock database of 9500+ stocks for some attractive growth and yield attributes subject to maximum valuation limits — rendering 232 issues.
We then screened those 232 issues for strong upward price movements — rendering 9 issues, 5 of which are pipeline limited partnerships, and 1 of which is an emerging markets utility. Eliminating our requirement for the direction of the primary trend (200-day average), the test produced 14 total prospects.
Filtered Lists:
The list of filter survivors is presented below in alphabetical symbol order followed by Wrights Quality Ratings (rated for liquidity, financial strength, profitability and growth — see legend for ratings further below):
BPL Buckeye Partners LP - ACC6
EOC Empresa Nacional de Electricidad (Chile) - NBB1
MMP Magellan Midstream Partners LP - BCB1
NS NuStar Energy LP - BBD7
PAA Plains All American Pipeline LP - ACC7
PAS Pepsi Americas - BCC1
ROST Ross Stores - AAA1
SXL Sunoco Logistics Partners LP - BCB1
WYE Wyeth - ABA1
If we relax the criteria and do not use a requirement for the direction of the 200-day average, the list expands by 5 more issues:
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners LP - BCA1
IBM International Business Machines - ABA1
NBL Noble Energy - AAA2
PCZ Petro Canada - AAA1
VAL Valspar - BBB7
Fundamental Screening Details:
The fundamental screening criteria were as shown in the table below:
The minimum price and “not OTC” criteria reduced the 9500+ database to 4478 issues (100% of the universe of interest). The EV/EBITDA maximum valuation criteria further reduced the field to 3669 issues (82% of the universe). The 5-year sales growth, diluted continuing earnings growth and dividend growth brought the list down to 516 issues (12% of the universe). The remaining criteria of payout ratio, yield now versus 5-year average, and 5-years of successive dividend increases, eliminated all but 232 issues (5% of the universe).
Price Action Screening Details:
The price action criteria we used were as follows:
200-day, 100-day, 50-day and 25-day simple moving averages now are higher than the day before
100-day, 50-day, 25-day averages and price are higher than the 200-day average
price is higher than the 25-day average
25-day average is higher than the 50-day average
50-day average is higher than the 100-day average
Legend for Wright’s Quality Ratings:
Quality Rating from Wrights Investor’s Services evaluate four dimensions (first three alpha and the fourth numeric). In order of appearance left to right the ratings are for:
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha
community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors,
in contrast to contributors' articles.
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Screening for Yielding, Growing, Rising Stocks 0 comments
What do you get when you want yield that is growing along with sales and earnings over a period of years, less than sky high valuation, and evidence of a rising price pattern?
The answer today is not very many stocks, and not necessarily the most exciting names. Not every exploration finds gold. Some of the results of this search are interesting, but we aren’t crying eureka.
ETFs were not included in this study of individual stocks listed on US exchanges.
Negative or neutral results can also be informative, however, for those who seek more than tips and immediate gratification.
The results are not recommendations, just the result of an exploration. We had hoped for a more exciting list, but what comes out is what comes out.
It is probably an example of asking for too much — as the saying goes, you can have anything you want, but not everything your want. Sometimes the stocks you want are going up, and sometimes the stocks going up aren’t the ones you want.
Ideally, the stocks you want for fundamental reasons are also going up in price.
Defining “going up” is a matter of investment time horizon and how much comfort you want that the price movement is actually upward. The criteria we used are fairly conservative.
If you are curious about how and what, read on.
What We Did:
We screened our fundamental stock database of 9500+ stocks for some attractive growth and yield attributes subject to maximum valuation limits — rendering 232 issues.
We then screened those 232 issues for strong upward price movements — rendering 9 issues, 5 of which are pipeline limited partnerships, and 1 of which is an emerging markets utility. Eliminating our requirement for the direction of the primary trend (200-day average), the test produced 14 total prospects.
Filtered Lists:
The list of filter survivors is presented below in alphabetical symbol order followed by Wrights Quality Ratings (rated for liquidity, financial strength, profitability and growth — see legend for ratings further below):
If we relax the criteria and do not use a requirement for the direction of the 200-day average, the list expands by 5 more issues:
Fundamental Screening Details:
The fundamental screening criteria were as shown in the table below:
click image to enlarge
[image at QVM site]
The minimum price and “not OTC” criteria reduced the 9500+ database to 4478 issues (100% of the universe of interest). The EV/EBITDA maximum valuation criteria further reduced the field to 3669 issues (82% of the universe). The 5-year sales growth, diluted continuing earnings growth and dividend growth brought the list down to 516 issues (12% of the universe). The remaining criteria of payout ratio, yield now versus 5-year average, and 5-years of successive dividend increases, eliminated all but 232 issues (5% of the universe).
Price Action Screening Details:
The price action criteria we used were as follows:
Legend for Wright’s Quality Ratings:
Quality Rating from Wrights Investor’s Services evaluate four dimensions (first three alpha and the fourth numeric). In order of appearance left to right the ratings are for:
Ratings levels (attributes #1 - #3):
Rating levels (attribute #4):
Charts for Issues Passing Both Filters:
[14 images at QVM site]
[Disclosure: We own BPL, MMP, NS, SXL and ARLP in some managed accounts.]
Richard Shaw
QVM Group LLC
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
Latest Followers
Posts by Ticker
Latest Comments
Most Commented