Steven Bavaria's  Instablog

Steven Bavaria
Send Message
Steven Bavaria writes about finance, economics and politics, drawing on his forty-five years experience in international banking, credit, investment, human resources/training, journalism and public service. Now retired from his "day job" on Wall Street, Bavaria lives mostly off his investments.... More
My book:
TOO GREEDY FOR ADAM SMITH: CEO Pay and the Demise of Capitalism
  • America’s next class war: Pension “Haves” versus “Have Nots”  3 comments
    Jan 9, 2011 3:55 PM

    Nowhere have America’s public and private sectors diverged more broadly than in the area of pensions. Private corporations, with lots of actuaries, lawyers and accountants on staff, figured out 25 years ago that traditional pensions were too unpredictable and expensive, and began the switch to “defined contribution” plans, like 401Ks and IRAs. As a result, most recent retirees or existing private sector workers have essentially “do it yourself” pensions where your own success and/or luck in investing your 401K, IRA or similar vehicle determines whether you retire at 60, 65, 70 or not at all.

     

    Not so in the public sector, where there were lots of actuaries, lawyers and accountants as well, except they worked for the public service unions, and managed to slip all sorts of “fine print” details into contracts that never would have been accepted by private corporations. Among them are benefit formulas that allow for “pension spiking” where an employee can include overtime worked as part of their salary for computing pension benefits. As a result, thousands of public employees with salaries of, say, $75,000 per year, end up with pensions of $100,000 or $150,000, because they intentionally booked hundreds of extra hours of overtime during their final year of work. These clauses were slipped into thousands of public employee union contracts not only here in New York but all across America over the past few decades because (1) nobody was paying attention, and (2) the politicians who knew about it were mostly in the unions’ pockets via campaign contributions, or else knew the cost would mostly come due years later during some other politician’s term of office (by which time the earlier politician might even be enjoying an inflated pension of his/her own.)

     

    Now the cost is coming due, with a vengeance. We will shortly be facing a choice in many states, especially those with big, highly entrenched unionized state and municipal workforces, of whether to use tax dollars to pay for current services (teachers, police, fire fighters, sanitation workers, DMV clerks, etc.) or to pay the bloated pensions of those who did these jobs years – even decades – ago. Besides having pensions that most private sector workers don’t have, they often have medical benefits provided to them on a subsidized basis or even free, while normal retirees not yet eligible for Medicare (or with younger families not Medicare eligible) have to struggle to pay huge COBRA premiums or buy high-priced private medical insurance.

     

    As the gap widens between these two groups of pension “haves” and “have nots,” it will realign traditional political voting blocs. Younger public employees, seeing themselves laid off while tax dollars are shipped to earlier retirees now living large in Florida, Arizona and other retiree watering holes, may find themselves making common cause with private sector baby boomers (many of them retired early through job losses and layoffs) struggling to make ends meet on IRAs and other investment savings downsized by the financial crash and Great Recession. You don’t have to be a Tea Party member to be offended by the idea of bloated public pensions where people work 25 years earning X dollars per year and then retire at age 55 and collect 2 times X dollars per year as a pension for the next 30 or 40 years.

     

    In the private sector there are plenty of legal precedents for breaking contracts that involved fraud and self-dealing, and there are bankruptcy courts for addressing companies that are unable to meet their obligations. But no such obvious mechanisms exist to bail out states and municipalities whose promises exceed their ability to perform.

     

     What will happen when legislators find themselves having to choose between meeting pension obligations to retirees and having enough money to meet today’s essential services? This is uncharted legal and political territory. It is hard to imagine judges ordering legislators elected on “reduce tax and spending” platforms to do the opposite, or to hold them in contempt if they choose not to. But a legal ruling to invalidate past union contracts would be equally radical, and could wend its way through appeals courts and even the Supreme Court for years before it was finally settled. Although nobody knows exactly how these issues will be resolved, it is clear that the future financial health of our cities, states and nations is at stake.

    (Published in the Journal News 1/9/2011 page 19A:
    Pension issue pits public vs. private sector







    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
Back To Steven Bavaria's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • J. Stack
    , contributor
    Comments (320) | Send Message
     
    Thanks, Steven. I was looking for an article that explained all of this in plain English. And, you did it. I constantly mention to people that the salaries plus all benefits plus retirement income for ALL public employees should be published every year throughout America.
    26 Feb 2011, 06:55 PM Reply Like
  • Steven Bavaria
    , contributor
    Comments (702) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Thanks - you made my day. Glad somebody read this. I think it was ahead of the curve given all that's taking place in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states. We're in for a rough ride politically over the next few years as we sort out these issues.
    28 Feb 2011, 08:08 PM Reply Like
  • J. Stack
    , contributor
    Comments (320) | Send Message
     
    Glad I made someone happy. The daily news is grim with union-admirers going crazy. Even our president seems to be enamoured by unions. Wish he was more even-handed on these matters.
    Keep writing and I will surely follow your comments. Regards. Joseph Stack
    I should add an interesting bit of experience. After 33 years working for World Book Encyclopedia in Chicago, I was "laid off" and decided at the time to ditch office work and took a job for six months in the water department in Highland Park where we lived.
    I was this funny white collar guy working in a blue collar group of very fine men. However, the head foreman was in that position for many years, and had control of scheduling work on broken water mains. He would always arrange to get us working after 4PM and if he could on nights or weekends if he could arrange it. He was notorious in his "scheduling talent" and amassed $50,000 per year in overtime above his salary. Everybody in public works knew what was going on, but nobody could stop it. This experience taught me something about public workers and their compensation. End of story.
    1 Mar 2011, 07:47 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • Always glad to see $ECC management buying more shares. http://tinyurl.com/zv7w2ct
    Jun 20, 2016
  • Here is the link on the $ECC announcement: http://bit.ly/1JU6zZQ
    Jun 9, 2016
  • I see $ECC just announced their May 31st NAV is up by another 50-60 cents (estimated range) from a month ago. The upward trend continues.
    Jun 9, 2016
More »

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.