Seeking Alpha

Vinod Dar's  Instablog

Vinod Dar
Send Message
I am the managing director of Dar&Company in Bethesda, MD. We provide business advice and corporate governance coaching to presidents, CEOs, and chairmen of energy and utility companies. Our clients have ranged from the largest utility holding, energy finance and energy technology companies... More
  • Abiotic Oil and Gas: A Theory That Refuses To Vanish 13 comments
    Feb 3, 2010 11:50 AM

    In the West it is almost universally held that all oil and gas is derived from fossils. This is not the case elsewhere, particularly among Russian and Ukrainian scientists who have, over several generations, tenaciously propounded the notion that oil and gas are abiotic, can be found deep below the surface of the earth in most parts of the world and in very large amounts.


    Western geologists and scientists find the theory either annoying or amusing and refuse to consider it seriously although there are exceptions. The theory continues to be held in much higher regard by Russian scientists and geologists (including some working in the West) for historical and perhaps ideological reasons.


    Many Russian geologists and petroleum researchers credit the rise of Russia over the past 50 years as the largest producer of oil and second largest producer of natural gas in the world to the successful application of the abiogenic theory of oil and gas formation. The Russians claim to have successfully drilled over 300 ultra deep (around 40,000feet) oil and gas wells through granite and basalt based on this theory. These claims have been questioned by Western geologists and petroleum engineers.


    The most recent attempt at gaining credence for the abiogenic idea was only a few months ago. A research team at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, led by Vladimir Kutherov, demonstrated that animal and plant fossils are not necessary for producing oil and natural gas. The team simulated the thermal and pressure processes that occur in the inner layers of the earth to generate hydrocarbons, the chief component of oil and natural gas. The team also noted that oil and gas has been found 7 miles below ground in Texas and fossil oil and gas could not, via, gravity have seeped down to such depths.


    According to the Prof. Kutherov all types of bedrock can serve as reservoirs of hydrocarbon energy and their method of discovery can enhance exploration success rates from 20 % to 70 %. The research team has developed a new technique for locating oil and gas resources. It consists of dividing the globe into a fine grid, which corresponds to underground fissures or migration channels. Hydrocarbon resources will be found wherever migration channels intersect, predicts the team.


    An  abiogenic theory of petroleum is not new, dating from the 16th century .In the 19th century two very accomplished scientists, Alexander von Humboldt and Dimitri Mendeleev( of the Periodic Table fame) advanced the concept. In the 20th century the Russian- Ukrainian School of geology emerged in the Soviet Union to vigorously formulate the modern theory of abiogenic oil and gas. In the West, the most eloquent and determined proponent was the famous astronomer Thomas Gold. After his death, Jack Kenney of Gas Resources Corporation has become the leading Western exponent.


    The prevailing abiotic theory is that the full complement of hydrocarbons found in oil and gas are generated in the mantle (40 to 90 miles below the surface of the earth) by non-biological processes. These hydrocarbons then migrate out of the mantle into the crust where they escape or are trapped by impermeable strata that lead to reservoir formation.


    Specific examples to support the abiotic theory have been cited over the years. Each example has been dismissed by the Western establishment as specious while it has been hailed by proponents as convincing. This is always so when a deeply entrenched belief and massive money flows encounter a subversive idea that profoundly threatens the prevailing order. The debate is becoming increasingly shrill as the two diametrically opposed views of Peak Oil and Abiogenic(Superabundant) Oil collide in a clash not only of science but, far more importantly, of money and ideology.


    Specific examples cited are the impressive recharging from below, not the sides, of the Eugene Island field (wells in deep decline exhibiting sharply increased production; recovery far in excess of  estimated remaining reserves) off new Orleans; the White Tiger oil field in Vietnam( discovered by a Russian company, Vietsovpetro) in fractured basement granite; the Panhandle-Hugoton field (high helium content) in Teaxs-Oklahoma, the Shengli Field and Songliao Basin in Northeastern China( supposedly mantle derived natural gas), and the well known Chimaera natural gas seep in Turkey. This seep has been known to be continuously active for thousands of years and represents the largest cataloged emission of abiogenic methane on land. The vast amounts of methane released by the biggest mud volcano eruptions are allegedly greater than found in the most abundant natural gas fields in commercial production. The presence of considerable amounts of hydrocarbons not associated with tectonic structures is also presented as evidence and, of course, the enormous methane hydrate deposits found all over the world are asserted to be of abiogenic origin. Finally, theory advocates aver that the impressive record of recent ultra deep drilling in the Gulf of Mexico supports their idea.


    The matrix of scientific, political and business interests in the West, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Brazil (an emerging oil exporter of consequence) and Venezuela that refuses to countenance abiogenic theories is big and potent. These interests want oil and gas to be scarce and expensive for a variety of reasons. It is natural and understandable that no credible test of the theory will be attempted within the ambit of these interests.

    The Russian authorities and oil and gas companies seem to be deeply conflicted between intellectual pride (it is their theory, after all) and the desire to keep oil and gas prices high via the idea of scarcity when talking to the rest of the world about their abiogenic oil and gas reserves.


    It seems to the author, however, that China and India have compelling economic and national security interests in proving or disproving the theory, convincingly. If the theory is false then they are no worse off than today. If it is correct then they, of the major nations in the world, have the most to gain in subverting the prevailing oil and gas order of the world. So, of course, do scores of millions of ordinary Americans who care nothing about theories but want cheap, abundant, reliable oil and gas.



    Disclosure: No Positions
    Themes: Natural Gas, Oil
Back To Vinod Dar's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (13)
Track new comments
  • IF this is a possible and true then you can see why the corporations want to keep it under the radar. The Russians, being a communist based society and not capitalists would want to find the proof of abiotic oil to provide for everyone in the "State". We on the other hand would want to keep it quiet because the profiteers would not profit if oil was a by product of the earths normal function. We forget we are on a living thing not a dead rock. Is it possible that oil is a much more plentiful resource and to some degree renewable? Dead plants, plankton and dinosaurs are putting gas in my corvette? Billions of gallons of oil were made by ancient forests? Really? It seems that even the abiotic naysayers agree that it exists. Hmmmm. The revolution could start here.
    14 Mar 2010, 04:25 AM Reply Like
  • Mr. Thomas Gold was a genius.


    His book, The Deep Hot Biosphere, made far too much sense not to believe in the Abiogenic Theory of Petroleum Formation.


    The fact that so much hydrocarbon was found on the moon Titan, should convince non believers that hydrocarbon fuel is NOT a fossil fuel.


    After all, does anyone believe that dinosaurs and plants ever existed on Titan ?


    Drill, Baby, Drill. We aren't going to run out anytime soon.
    21 Apr 2010, 05:54 PM Reply Like
  • If biogenic, then the carbon was in the atmosphere at one time and the earth survived all that carbon (CO2). So, burn it all up and even though the earth may warm, it will survive. I am ok with a warmer earth if we get there by reusing carbon. But, if abiogenic, then we could indeed overload the atmosphere with carbon. That would be a new experiment I am not willing for us to undertake as we could then all need undertakers.
    31 May 2010, 10:11 PM Reply Like
  • The most important point of all this is that the cheap and easy stuff has been found and extracted. All the rest regardless of its source will be far more expensive.
    3 Jul 2010, 10:58 PM Reply Like
  • It is interesting to note the most abundant element in our solar system is Hydrogen and methane is CH4, a combustible gas with considerable BTU values. It seems to me to be reasonable that any carbon and hydrogen under extreme heat and pressure would indeed produce an oily alphatice residue with no introduction of life as we know it.......Dr. Gaines Bradford Jackson......Environme... and Chemist
    10 Nov 2010, 12:25 PM Reply Like
  • If you want to know who I am go to the following websites.....










    Other sites..........







    10 Nov 2010, 12:35 PM Reply Like
  • Its interesting that many people in India are concerned about abiotic oil and russian-ukraine theory. There is an international conference in India during September 2011 where the concerned issue will be thoroughly discussed.
    All are invited


    More details at



    1 Mar 2011, 12:08 PM Reply Like
  • The theory is correct. We have the only known technology that can see it and have proved it.
    Michael Kaminski
    Tellus Exploration
    19 Aug 2012, 04:24 PM Reply Like
  • We were able to validate the theory.


    Michael Kaminski
    Tellus Exploration
    19 Aug 2012, 04:25 PM Reply Like
  • Is carbon dating of oil/gas possible ? If so, wouldn't that give the age of the deposits and if abiognic pre-date the dinosaur era ?


    Tom Stiebler
    18 Sep 2012, 09:33 AM Reply Like
  • Read Thomas Gold's excellent book. Petroleum is not directly datable by any reliable method. However, microbes found in deposits and the age of surrounding rocks are often used with unmerited hubris.
    1 Jan 2013, 01:06 AM Reply Like
  • Abiotic oil is hogwash:

    12 Dec 2013, 03:58 PM Reply Like
  • Russian oil production has been increasing every year since 2009, exactly opposite from what biotic oil proponents had predicted.
    28 Feb, 02:10 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.