I'm a retired CPA who spent the majority of his working career in technology companies. My work resume included management stints at Atari Inc, Daisy Systems Corp, Symantec Corp and Visio Corp. My last position at Visio (VSIO) was as CFO and VP Finance and Operations.
Sequenom has done a pretty good job of informing investors of the early response to their lab developed test ("LDT") for Trisomy 13, 18 and 21 ("T21 Plus"). The most recent announcement was that they had achieved an annual run rate of 60,000 T21 Plus tests processed as of May 28th. Watching the processed tests rate will go a long way toward reducing uncertainty with respect to market acceptance. Even so, there are substantial uncertainties still remaining with respect to the future of this space. The IP battle will go on in the courts, likely for years. Reimbursement by insurance carriers is also uncertain. There is the binary risk of yes/no but also the amount risk. Sequenom has stated they have 20 million lives covered, after Coventry decided to cancel their coverage. This post is focused on the cost of testing, but investors need to recognize that cost is linked to revenues. Ignoring the revenue timing and uncertainties could result in any cost analysis becoming meaningless.
Despite their cautionary comments, Sequenom has been very helpful to investors looking to understand their component costs of testing. The company has provided 2 pie chart slides in the presentation deck, which describe their expectation of test costs. In the first chart, the company stated that they expected to get the total cost of the test to between $500-$600 (used $550) within several quarters. In that chart, I'm estimating that the component costs are:
Cost of T21 Plus Initial
%
Amt
Reagents
28%
$155
Logistics/Shipping
25%
$135
Labor
18%
$100
Equipment/depreciation
12%
$65
Royalty
12%
$65
Lab OH
5%
$30
Total
100%
$550
They provided a second chart which projected the component costs in mid C-13. They are projecting a 30-40% improvement in costs excluding royalties. My estimate of their chart relative costs are :
Cost of T21 Plus Mid C-13
%
Amt
Reagents
40%
$150
Logistics/Shipping
10%
$40
Labor
18%
$70
Equipment/depreciation
10%
$40
Royalty
17%
$65
Lab OH
5%
$20
Total
100%
$385
To put the above in context and to provide a sanity check, investors should note the following:
The total cost of diagnostic services in CY-11 was $10,031k per the 10k.
The total number of tests done in CY-11 per the company exceeded 21,000. This included approximately 1,000 T21 Plus LDT's. This calculates to $478 per LDT processed.
The total cost of diagnostic services in Mar-12 was $6,871k
The total number of tests done in Mar-12 exceeded 12,700 of which over 4,900 was T21 Plus per the company. This calculates to $541 per test.
Per the 10Q: We have made up-front payments to Isis and agreed to pay to Isis royalties on net sales of products developed or produced using the licensed patent rights, including specified minimum royalty amounts and milestone payments upon commercial events with respect to products for particular indications. (bold/italics by author)
The company has stated that they are reporting costs as incurred and revenues as received. Therefore, the royalty component of cost of diagnostic revenue should be reflected in the financial statements as the reimbursement is received. It therefore follows that the cost per test would have been higher in all historical periods. When the company has enough evidence to move to accrual basis for revenue recognition, there would be a royalty expense accrual associated with it. Assuming the above estimate of $65 per test and a benchmark of $1,850 blended revenue per test, the royalty rate calculates to approximately 3.5% of revenues.
The above analysis is based upon company provided information. However, it is an estimate and interpretation of that information, and may prove to be unreliable. Additional information from the company is required in order to validate and refine these estimates.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha
community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors,
in contrast to contributors' articles.
Anyone interested in SQNM might benefit from a group forum we set up to post links, files and comments bear or bull about company at http://bit.ly/MdFHLL
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Sequenom: Getting A Handle On Cost Of Diagnositic Testing 1 comment
Sequenom has done a pretty good job of informing investors of the early response to their lab developed test ("LDT") for Trisomy 13, 18 and 21 ("T21 Plus"). The most recent announcement was that they had achieved an annual run rate of 60,000 T21 Plus tests processed as of May 28th. Watching the processed tests rate will go a long way toward reducing uncertainty with respect to market acceptance. Even so, there are substantial uncertainties still remaining with respect to the future of this space. The IP battle will go on in the courts, likely for years. Reimbursement by insurance carriers is also uncertain. There is the binary risk of yes/no but also the amount risk. Sequenom has stated they have 20 million lives covered, after Coventry decided to cancel their coverage. This post is focused on the cost of testing, but investors need to recognize that cost is linked to revenues. Ignoring the revenue timing and uncertainties could result in any cost analysis becoming meaningless.
Despite their cautionary comments, Sequenom has been very helpful to investors looking to understand their component costs of testing. The company has provided 2 pie chart slides in the presentation deck, which describe their expectation of test costs. In the first chart, the company stated that they expected to get the total cost of the test to between $500-$600 (used $550) within several quarters. In that chart, I'm estimating that the component costs are:
They provided a second chart which projected the component costs in mid C-13. They are projecting a 30-40% improvement in costs excluding royalties. My estimate of their chart relative costs are :
To put the above in context and to provide a sanity check, investors should note the following:
The above analysis is based upon company provided information. However, it is an estimate and interpretation of that information, and may prove to be unreliable. Additional information from the company is required in order to validate and refine these estimates.
Disclosure: I am long SQNM.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
Share this Instablog
This post has 1 comment:
Latest Followers
StockTalks
-
GTACS vendor awards announced. TSYS one of 20 http://1.usa.gov/SzBDG1
Nov 1, 2012
-
TSYS must know of or anticipate some specific orders. Hiring in WA, MD, VA, CA. Opened over 60 new positions this quarter.
Aug 27, 2012
-
Next contract vehicles are Eagle II $22b and GTAC $10b potentials. Awards expected by EOY. TSYS optimistic
Aug 27, 2012
More »Latest Comments
Most Commented
Posts by Themes