Seeking Alpha

Michael Clark's  Instablog

Michael Clark
Send Message
Michael J. Clark was born and raised in Sinclair, Wyoming. He is a poet, novelist, artist, historian, and market analyst. His fine arts portfolio can be found at the following address: http://www.hoalantrangallery.com/MJC2.htm His writing portfolio can be found at:... More
My company:
Clark's Gate Timing System ©
  • PART TWO: BE READY FOR MORE SELLING IN STOCKS AND COMMODITIES THIS WEEK. WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT THE ELECTION? 3 comments
    Nov 5, 2012 10:59 PM

    (Part One wondered why the most important issue facing America today was skirted by the democratic process like a plague over the last year or more: Can America Afford the American Dream is it Means Taking on More Debt and Pretending This is Not an Issue? Is the Federal Reserve Board Helping to Fix America's Problems or Helping to Transfer Political Power to the Banks In America?)

    PART TWO

    OK. I have been arguing over the last two weeks that stocks are topping, led by tech stocks, and that investors should be selling and even short-selling at this point.

    Lets look at the S&P 500 Index, first, to see what it looks like up close and personal. The red line in the chart is my CGTS Indicator. During an advance, CGTS makes higher highs and higher lows. The blue line is what I call M5 Indicator: it is similar to the CGTS Indicator except that it tends to lead a rally and signal a decline early. When the blue line leads the red line up the scale, you almost always have a rally; when the blue line falls early and cuts through the red line, this is a WARNING SIGN. When both blue lines and red lines are making lower lows and lower highs, it is time to sell.

    The green line is a short term trend indicator. Most important is the TREND of this indicator, if it is making higher highs and higher lows or lower lows and lower highs. However, it also DOES matter which direction the indicator is travelling.

    In the chart below, GSPC (S&P 500) is negative as far as the CGTS Indicator (red line), negative as far as the M5 Indicator (blue line); and negative absolutely in terms of T2.5 (Short Term Trend -- green line) although not yet negative in terms of the trend of this indicators.

    The red line and the blue line are both in a free fall and both SHOULD BE topping short-time -- and should start back down again. The second chart shows the indicator that is telling me that stocks are currently OVERBOUGHT short-term.

    (click to enlarge)

    This chart is the same as the one above except it shows in the bottom pane our short-term momentum indicator M2 ALT which says the short-term 'rally' in GSPC seems to be ending and selling should come this week. All the other momentum indicators in this chart are negative.

    (click to enlarge)

    Note how the most recent 'rally' in GSPC took the index, after strong selling, from 1403 to only 1431, far short of the 1461 that was needed to take out overhead resistance and turn the direction of prices back up.

    Tech stocks led this decline. The NDX is still negative and should head lower.

    (click to enlarge)

    Those who wish to short the Dow stocks might look at shorting UDOW, the Dow Bullish ETF, which is topping.

    (click to enlarge)

    The Russell Small Cap Index (RUT) is going down. Note the short-term momentum is overbought and declining.

    (click to enlarge)

    Gold Stocks (XAU) have resisted selling, but seems to be loosing strength.

    (click to enlarge)

    XCI, Computer Index: Tech stocks led the decline and XCI still looks terrible. M2 ALT shows how weak the current rally has been.

    (click to enlarge)

    XOI, Oil and Gas Index: Overbought, set to decline.

    (click to enlarge)

    Generally speaking, European stocks look better than American. But Germany does not -- GDXI is heading lower.

    (click to enlarge)

    Japan looks stronger than Korea -- KS11, the Korean Index -- is not overbought but the index is topping.

    (click to enlarge)

    BKX, Banking Index: bank stocks have held up well during the recent selling but they seem to be breaking down. This week's selling (M2 ALT overbought) should make this top clear to everyone.

    (click to enlarge)

    Recently, US Dollar strength has been congruent with stock and commodity weakness. The Dollar seems to be bottoming against the Euro. Also, UDN, the US Dollar Bearish ETF, is breaking down, after a pathetic rally. This means the US Dollar should rally -- and stocks should come down more.

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    INDIVIDUAL STOCKS

    These are issues we are currently shorting or watching to short (the first three charts fit this category).

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    CONTINUING SHORT POSITIONS

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)(click to enlarge)

    (click to enlarge)

    So, does this suggest anything about the coming election? Does Wall Street really want a Romney win? It isn't clear. No recent democratic president has been better to Wall Street than Barack Obama. President Obama has done everything the banks told him to do. He has empowered Ben Bernanke to carry out the continued rule of Wall Street Banks in Washington, helping to funnel billions in taxpayer money back toward the banks, while helping to shift the blame for the Financial Meltdown away from Wall Street back toward the government

    What does Romney offer Wall Street that Obama does not? The Democrats bent over to Wall Street under Clinton and the power shift from Washington to New York was accomplished then; and has been solidified even more under Obama.

    Romney wants to fire Ben Bernanke -- or at least he said the did two months ago, before everything suddenly got quiet about Bernanke on the campaign train. Bernanke has said he will not seek a third term, perhaps as a way of telling Romney he (Bernanke) will step down.

    I'm a bit off-target in this discussion anyway. Investors are selling -- Wall Street is not selling. If investors are selling and will continue selling this week, what does that say about the election?

    Heavy government spending cuts (Romney's promise) will lead to a Greece-like situation in America, not with the exact same result, but with a depression. Investor selling may have nothing to do with the election, and may not herald the election at all, in fact. what it probably does herald is an understanding that the dis-inflation engineered by Ben Bernanke and Barack Obama is NOT a reinflation tactic but a stalling tactic, and that recreation of growth in the global economy is not going to be easy.

    Maybe this selling is just signalling a late but irresistable recognition that the life-style we are living is grinding down and can't be resurrected until we go through the needed and painful stage of Real Deflation, which involves a sobering truth: the Fiscal Cliff is getting closer. And maybe the understanding is that is does not really matter who gets elected on Tuesday. Maybe the understanding is that there is not easy, quick fix to the quicksand we have constructed for ourself as a nation through easy debt -- 'Don't Ask; Don't Tell'.

    One cannot spend money one does not have unless the money one borrows increases one's income. Borrowed money must provide investment gains or it becomes quicksand and leads to one's eventual destruction through suffocation.

    Borrowing money at the end of an economic growth season is economic suicide. 2001 was the end of an economic growth season, as was 1965 and 1929.

    Heavy indebtedness does not take into consideration the cyclical nature of economic growth followed by economic decline -- Boom and Bust. The economy grows for 18 years; then it contracts for 18 years. Our refusal to recognize the existence of this discrete cycle means that we will never be able to understand the dangers of too much debt during prolonged periods of 'guaranteed' economic deflation.

    I found this related article on Seeking Alpha today:

    • Wednesday, October 31, 11:32 AM Roughly 70% of those surveyed by Institutional Investor expect higher stocks in the wake of a Romney victory, with half of those predicting a substantial rally. With an Obama victory, about three quarters expect anything from no move to a big sell-off. SPY +66% since 1/20/2009.

    If these investors are correct -- when is the majority of investors ever correct? -- then the coming (continuing) decline in stocks and commodities suggests that President Obama will be re-elected on Tuesday night.

    Michael J. Clark

    CGTS, Hanoi, Vietnam

Back To Michael Clark's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • SeekingTruth
    , contributor
    Comments (1167) | Send Message
     
    Interesting commentary and technical analysis, and well stated.
    Counterpoint: Who is elected President DOES matter!
    My state is such a one sided state that I was able to cast a psychologically satisfying but totally irrelevant vote for the person of my real choice.
    However, if I were living in a swing state I would have voted for one of the two actual candidates.
    Why does it matter?
    Because it is our only chance for the eventual nomination of a MODERATE SUPREME COURT , and the possibility of a democratic (small "d") non GOP national agenda.
    That said , I am really ticked off by Obama signing the liberty killing NDAA document allowing the government to lock up or kill anyone they want without due process.
    How can a national state get more oppressive and authoritarian than that?!
    So I have to lean on the Supreme Court process as the final deciding factor even though otherwise there are too many bitter pills to swallow concurrently - the best of two very bad choices but oh so sad!
    5 Nov 2012, 11:41 AM Reply Like
  • Michael Clark
    , contributor
    Comments (8467) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » I agree with you actually. I am also disappointed with Obama. But I still want him to be re-elected. I think the old mentality of the right-wing that business and the empowering of the mafioso mentality to rob and steal at will is archaic and needs to be broken down in this country. We want to be a great civilization. And, as such, we need our leadership to care about more than just money.

     

    The money, money, money culture has huge limitations if one wants to give to the world all the great things civilizations have given to the world in the past.

     

    I'd urge you to vote for Obama, even though his coddling of the bankers his frustrated me greatly.
    5 Nov 2012, 12:25 PM Reply Like
  • SeekingTruth
    , contributor
    Comments (1167) | Send Message
     
    Michael,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We agree on the essentials.
    I view the Obama admin. as the Republican "B" team which results in the right wing being out of office, BUT NEVER SUBSTANTIALLY OUT OF POWER.
    And yes again, my vote would have been for Obama had it mattered and actually counted for something.
    Abolish the Electoral College or at least make it proportional similar to Maine and Nebraska, i.e.
    MAKE EVERY VOTE COUNT!
    5 Nov 2012, 02:15 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.