Wildebeest's  Instablog

Send Message
Wildebeest is a PhD MBA who invests primarily in resource stocks such as base metals, iron ore and coal.
My blog:
  • An Australian Sovereign Wealth Fund. What Sovereign Wealth? 2 comments
    Aug 1, 2011 12:11 AM

    Should Australia have a sovereign wealth fund (SWF)? Whenever I hear this discussed my first thought is what do you mean by sovereign wealth? The Australian government can set aside a pool of funds at any time and call it whatever it wants. For example the “Future Fund” is listed in wikipedia as being an Australian sovereign wealth fund. The discussion in recent times seems to be linked to the once in a generation mining boom. Mining by definition extracts a non-renewable resource, so at a time when windfall profits are being made in mining, due to the demand from China, people understandably feel that some portion of that money should be set aside for the future. But does Australia actually have “sovereign wealth” from which a SWF can be funded?


    There is a national accounting identity:

    CA = (T – G) + (S – I)

    This says that taxes, T, minus government spending, G, plus private savings, S, minus private investment, I, must equal the current account CA. If (T - G) is positive then the government is running a surplus, if it is negative a deficit. (S - I) can be thought of as the net private sector savings. If it is positive then wealth is being accumulated. This accounting identity is what it is independent of ideology or political beliefs: the identity is the same whether you are progressive or conservative, or regardless what brand of economic belief system you subscribe to.


    If the government sets up a SWF it could be funded from existing money:


    CA = SWF + (T – SWF – G) + (S – I)


    or it could be funded by raising taxes


    CA = SWF + (T – G) + (S – SWF – I)


    Australia has been running current account deficits for ever and a day:

    current account balance

    So the left hand side of the equation is negative, has been negative for a long time, and is likely to be negative for a long time. By definition the right hand side must equal the left hand side so must be negative. Now imagine that the government was to “quarantine” money in an investment fund which, we'll call a SWF. Prior to the formation of a SWF we know that (T – G) + (S – I) is a negative number. In order to create the SWF the net government and private sector balances have decreased by an amount equal to SWF:


    (T – G) + (S – I) – SWF


    If follows that while Australia runs a current account deficit, if money were to be placed in an investment fund by the government the rest of the government and private sector would be further indebted by an amount equal to the SWF. In such circumstances a sovereign wealth fund would be an inappropriate name since the fund would in fact be funded by driving the rest of the economy further into debt.


    Contrast this with Norway which runs current account surpluses from which it follows that (T – G) + (S – I) is a positive number. As long as their SWF does not exceed the current account surplus, then money can be set aside while still leaving the net government and private sectors in surplus. Norway is accumulating sovereign wealth and is able to set aside this wealth in a SWF without making its economy indebted. Australia on the other hand, by running current account deficits is not accumulating sovereign wealth. While one sector of the economy, mining, may be doing very well, as a nation you have to ask “what sovereign wealth?” If an investment fund was created it would be from money which drives the remainder of the economy further into debt. Perhaps “sovereign debt fund”, SDF, would be a better description of such a fund. Creation of a SDF would have a negative effect on GDP growth.


    This analysis of the national accounts also ties in to discussions about balanced budgets. We can see that if T – G = 0, i.e. the government balances its budget, then the private sector must carry the debt burden arising from the current account deficits. This presumably hasn't occurred to politicians from either persuasion who thump the table about the need for the budget to be balanced, or even worse for the budget to go into surplus. A balanced budget in these circumstances of endless current account deficits is likely to hamper GDP growth.


    However should it be decided, for whatever reason, political or ideological, that Australia needs to run a sovereign investment fund, or needs to balance its budget, then the national discussion would be better off focussing on the structural reasons for continued current account deficits, since mandating a balanced government budget merely shifts the debt burden to the private sector rather than addressing the source or cause of the debt.

    On the other hand the purpose of this article is not to make a case for or against current account deficits, but to note that if they exist it follows that an equivalent deficit must exist among the private and government sectors.

    In summary while Australia is experiencing a mining boom it doesn't have sovereign wealth in the same sense as other countries that run successful sovereign wealth funds. So to the question of whether or not Australia should have a sovereign wealth fund I say “what sovereign wealth?”

Back To Wildebeest's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • TKline
    , contributor
    Comments (19) | Send Message
    As Australia's resources are depleted, the income from a SWF could alleviate the requirement for higher taxes to support aging baby boomers. The Oz economy is unbalanced, fixing it will hurt. If we implement a mining tax to mitigate Dutch disease or de-industrialise the broader economy, the cash should go to a sovereign wealth fund to be invested internationally and remove excess liquidity from the system. This would help the AUD stay low and rates wouldn't need to rise as much. There's a good discussion on the possibility of an Australian SWF on Australian Property Forum below.....


    4 Sep 2012, 05:55 PM Reply Like
  • Wildebeest
    , contributor
    Comments (778) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » structural current account deficit. not much else needs to be said.
    6 Mar 2013, 10:35 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • Codelco output up 5.7%: http://bloom.bg/lGcNVi pundits tell us that there are supply shortfalls and lower grades blah blah blah.
    May 27, 2011
  • Labor has claimed victory in the Australian election. This means the Labor-Green alliance will govern. A disaster for miners. Sell.
    Sep 7, 2010
  • Reports from Australia that the BHP Rio Tinto iron ore joint venture will not get regulatory approval.
    Aug 19, 2010
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.