Seeking Alpha

edgetraderplus'  Instablog

edgetraderplus
Send Message
Michael Noonan Edge Trader Plus Michael Noonan is the driving force behind Edge Trader Plus. He has been in the futures business for 30 years, functioning primarily in an individual capacity. He was the research analyst for the largest investment banker in the South, at one time, and he... More
My company:
edgetraderplus
My blog:
edgetraderplus
  • S N P - Trend, Facts, Rules = Successful Results 0 comments
    Jun 9, 2013 7:26 PM

    Sunday 9 June 2013

    Markets provide an opportunity to grow one's capital, and create a
    return on capital, in addition to a return of capital, its preservation
    being the benchmark to ensure it remains fully intact. Is there a
    magical formula for success in the markets? No. However, there
    is a realistic approach to increase the odds of consistent returns
    while keeping exposure to risk at an acceptable level.

    The S&P used to be our mainstay market concentration, but we
    stepped away from that market when central planners took over,
    starting with POMO, [Permanent Open Market Operations], conducted
    by the privately owned Federal Reserve. With fiat being pumped
    into the markets on an ongoing basis, it was a fatal blow to free
    market operations, where supply and demand were the true measures
    of value. Now, [then], there was only an artificial demand that took
    quarrel with any attempts by supply to alter the Fed's upward
    trajectory.

    These circumstances were unacceptable, and so we withdrew from
    analyzing the equity markets, rightly or wrongly, but right for us.
    There may be change coming, and if/when it does, 2008 will likely be
    relived, again, possibly worse, given how the buy side market has
    become so distorted. It is now back to our game plan, and greater
    attention will be given to reading developing market activity, which is what we do.

    Are successful results possible? Absolutely! There are never any
    guarantees in obtaining profitable results, but we know for certain that guidelines exist for gaining an edge in all markets: Trend, Facts, and
    Rules.

    The trend is the most important first piece of knowledge one can have in order to become profitable. Trends persist in the market, and they
    often go much farther than many think likely. If you want to be
    successful, you must always trade in the direction of the trend, in
    whatever time frame chosen. Plus, one must also be mindful of the
    next higher time frame to not run into a larger, potentially opposing
    force. Just this one observation, alone, can enhance one's odds for
    success.

    Facts. They are incontrovertible, conclusive, not subject to dispute.
    Facts are in direct opposition to opinions, themselves subject to beliefs or judgment, both of which fall short of certainty. We want as much
    certainty in decision-making as possible. Facts provide that.

    There are ways of determining the trend based on facts. There are
    ways of determining which force, supply or demand, is in control,
    based on facts. When you take the trend and combine it with factual
    market observations, it results in creating an edge for every market
    decision that can lead to stock market success. There is one more
    element.

    Rules, the missing ingredient for a majority of market participants.
    What undercuts successful trading/investing more than anything else? Having an opinion. We all have them, but they cannot be the compass upon which decision-making is based. Why not? Opinions are
    subjective, and almost always charged with emotion, ego, both of
    which are destabilizing factors.

    Why do so many people lose so much money? They have an opinion about what a market will/should do. "This market can't go much
    higher." But it does. [Trend]. "The market is overdue for a
    correction." It may be, but it does not correct. [Trend]. Once
    positioned in a market, emotions take over. "I can't take a loss. The
    market will bounce back." [Going against the trend and ignoring the
    facts.] You get the idea.

    Rule One: Trade with the trend. Rule two: Buy strength, not
    weakness. Rule three: Buy at support, once proven it will hold. Etc,
    etc, When you have a fixed set of rules that determine when to
    take a position within an established trend, the risk factors have been
    greatly reduced, and the odds for success have been enhanced.
    Neither is guaranteed, but the odds of probability are now tilted in
    your favor.

    With this brief, but comprehensive groundwork, we apply it to better
    understanding the charts and moving forward.

    The first fact to determine for the weekly S&P is the trend, and
    clearly, it is up. You can see how the lighter line connects the swing
    highs and lows. The highs are higher and the lows are higher, the
    essence of a trend. [It does not matter how one defines a trend, as
    long as the guidelines for its determination are used consistently.]

    It is also apparent that price closed higher for the week, and it did so
    on increased volume, both facts, regardless of what opinion someone
    may have. What does not show is how the weekly bar looked so
    weak, going into Thursday, and it appeared that the market would
    continue to sell off. However, the time frame is weekly, and we have to wait for the end of the week close in order to make a valid
    assessment. That would be a basic rule for weekly.

    If one made a determination to take action, based upon apparent
    weakness on lower prices starting Thursday morning, that action would have been based upon a judgment made at the time, [and proven
    wrong]. Taking any action at that point would have meant it was
    based on opinion and a breaking of rules, or alternatively, not even
    having a set of rules in place, which is just as bad.

    This is not to belabor the point, rather to drive home the importance of knowing the trend and adhering to rules, based upon market facts. The time frame is weekly, so no decision can be made until the close
    of the week is known, another fact. Despite the apparent drop in
    price, almost 50 points, starting out Thursday morning, the Trend,
    reasserted itself, and by day's end, price rallied the most in a single
    day from low to high close in many months.

    EPM W 9 Jun 13

    The weekly chart shows a strong, trending market. Higher time frames are stronger than lower time frames. The daily chart had been selling
    off, longer in time and greater in price since the November 2012 lows.
    The sell-off was approaching a swing high support from April, and the
    bottom of the down sloping demand line.

    The fact that price reversed and rallied so strongly from a known
    [potential] support area, demonstrated how and why knowing the
    trend is so important in order to react to the developing market
    activity and not be swayed by emotions. This is how to trade in the
    markets: knowing the trend, using facts gathered from the market,
    and having a set of rules for engagement.

    What to do now?

    Was the May high the high for this move? The trend says no. More
    evidence of a change is needed to make an informed decision. There
    are two likely scenarios. 1: The high is in and this is a retest of the
    high that will fail, leaving price to go lower. 2. This was just a natural
    correction within a bull market, and price will make higher highs,
    keeping the trend intact.

    With a set of rules, the decision is an easy one. For now, we have to
    go with the trend is up and should be heeded scenario, until proven
    otherwise. We can also add the fact that the last swing low, from
    Thursday, [should it hold], left bullish spacing. The last swing low is
    above the last swing high, as the two horizontal lines show.

    A weak retest of the 1596 low will confirm that the daily trend remains
    up. [The weekly is not close to turning, at this point.] What is a
    weak retest? Smaller range bars and lower volume when price
    declines, indicating sellers are not in control, as one example. Should
    that happen, it can set up another buy opportunity, next week.

    EPM D 9 Jun 13

    The NASDAQ shows greater spacing between last Thursday's low and
    the mid-April swing high. It is testing 50% of the previous range, a
    general guide, indicating overall strength. There is a slight conflict
    between the stronger volume on the sell-off from the May high,
    compared to the lesser volume from last week's rally. The possible
    offset to that negative is the fact that price rallied so easily from the low. Where were the sellers to stop the buyers?

    Bottom line is, in both markets the trend remains up, and a solid set of rules to determine when to buy within an uptrend will best serve one's
    objective of consistently profitable trading success.

    NDM D 9 Jun 13

    Themes: S P , NAS, DOW, Stocks
Back To edgetraderplus' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.