Seeking Alpha

Josh Dowlut's  Instablog

Josh Dowlut
Send Message
Regarding a fractional reserve banking system, the Rothschild brothers once said "The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependant on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." I am that rare individual they didn't... More
My company:
Federal Fidelity Mortgage
My blog:
Josh Dowlut
  • How Banks Repaid TARP: The Other Bailout Repayment Lie 3 comments
    May 4, 2010 7:35 PM
    Too big to fail banks repaid their TARP money with other bailout money.  To suggest that TARP was profitable to the taxpayer (as multiple, recent articles have suggested) is to use one-sided accounting that overlooks the 11 TRILLION dollar+ bailout nation that TARP played only a small (albeit noisy and notorious) part of.  CNNMoney (http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/bailouttracker/index.html) and the NYT (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/04/business/20090205-bailout-totals-graphic.html) have detailed and itemized the GDP sized totals of the bailouts beyond TARP.  I will explain how bailout money poured into some of the less notorious programs was laundered through to repay the TARP portion.

    While there are a few more moving parts to this scam, the mechanics are very much the same as the GM loan repayment lie (http://seekingalpha.com/article/200137-gm-loan-repayment-mischaracterization-at-best-lie-at-worst), essentially moving publicly financed money from one pot to another.  The trick here is to identify the pots and understand how they work.
    1. Borrow $1 at 0%, lend $10 against it at 3-4%:  The biggest item not on the CNN or NYT breakdown is a Federal funds rate of 0%.  This has enabled banks to "borrow" from the Fed at 0%, and then "lend" it to the taxpayer at 3-4% (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aucooSmI6UQQ).  Given fractional reserve banking rules they can multiply these spreads by a factor of 10.  If you're wondering how a failing bank can make a huge positive spread lending money to the exact same entity that bailed them out (Treasury and the taxpayer) so am I.
    2. Raising capital under the "too big to fail" guarantee:  Selling stock is much easier when the government has repeatedly said you won't be allowed to go out of business.  This is a key reason why smaller banks have not been able to raise the capital to repay TARP.
    3. Fannie and Freddie are banks' garbage cans:  Banks sold most of their bad loans to Fannie and Freddie, where they are now festering and losing money like hot garbage.  Very little of the actual residential loans were kept on banks' balance sheets.  The heavy losses are coming from the heavy holders.
    4. The Great Abyss of AIG:  Throw $100B+ down one end of AIG, and kick it out the other end to Goldman Sachs and various European headquartered banks.
    5. Trash for Cash, TAF and TALF:  You give us "hard to sell assets" (trash).  We give you cash.  Can I get that deal on the junk in my basement?
    Finally, if TARP has been so "profitable," why is the federal government projected to run deficits equal to or greater than 10% of GDP for as far as the eye can see?  On that question alone the idea of the bailout being "profitable" falls apart.  Misunderstanding of these facts is dangerous.  It increases the probability of a future bank bailout, and it decreases the probability those responsible for this one get removed from power.







    Disclosure: no positions
Back To Josh Dowlut's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • Josh Dowlut
    , contributor
    Comments (110) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » "Sanders said the audit should examine whether financial institutions received no-interest loans from the Fed that they then used to buy interest-bearing government bonds."-www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3.../
    7 May 2010, 10:23 AM Reply Like
  • Josh Dowlut
    , contributor
    Comments (110) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » More on borrow at 0, lend at 3-4, multiply spread by 10. The story is growing legs.

     

    finance.yahoo.com/tech...
    13 May 2010, 12:35 PM Reply Like
  • Josh Dowlut
    , contributor
    Comments (110) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » The latest update to this ruse

     

    finance.yahoo.com/blog...

     

    "each of the above exits makes reference either to Footnote 49 or Footnote 50. Footnote 49 reads: "Repayment pursuant to Title VII, Section 7001(g) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 using proceeds received in connection with the institution's participation in the Small Business Lending Fund." Footnote 50 reads: "Repayment pursuant to Title VII, Section 7001(g) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 — part of the repayment amount obtained from proceeds received in connection with the institution's participation in the Small Business Lending Fund."
    21 Jul 2011, 04:23 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.