Seeking Alpha

Barry North's  Instablog

Barry North
Send Message
Barry North is a successful full-time share trader, owner of North Capital Management and the founder of free investment website The idea for came from a desire to share his successful trading strategies and the stock-selection techniques he uses every day on US... More
My company: LLC
My blog:
  • New Research Reveals Secrets Of Warren Buffett's Success 3 comments
    Nov 7, 2012 1:08 AM

    An article in The Economist's September 29th - October 5th issue, has revealed the secrets behind Warren Buffet's stock picking prowess. Research by New York University and AQR Capital Management, a hedge fund adviser; say they have identified the main factors that have driven his success over decades.

    Turns out there are two main factors. Buying stocks with a low beta and a cheap source of funds by drawing on the floats maintained by the insurance companies he owns.

    It is a popular misconception that low beta equals low return. A good example is this excerpt from the

    Many utilities stocks have a beta of less than 1. Conversely, most high-tech Nasdaq-based stocks have a beta of greater than 1, offering the possibility of a higher rate of return, but also posing more risk. Read more:

    The economist article goes on to say that pension and mutual funds are barred from borrowing, so opt for higher beta stocks hoping for higher returns, making their portfolios more volatile. With funds chasing higher beta and ignoring lower beta stocks, the latter become under-valued and vice versa. So the astute Warren is using cheap money to buy undervalued stocks.

    We thought we would do a test on the 986 stocks that we cover at, beta range 0.17 to 2.93, and we have found it to be true. Lower beta stocks do out-perform their more volatile counterparts and we have found the optimum level, to draw the line. More on that later.

    What was also interesting is what we found when we grouped stocks by our recommendation and their average beta.

    Value Buys averaged a 1.06 beta, non-value Buys 0.96 and Holds 0.94, had an overall average of 0.99, so lower by .01 than the S&P500. These are stocks we like and like Warren we are leaning towards lower betas.

    Sells 1.25 and *no opinion offered 1.39, had an average of 1.32. These two, for varying reasons, are not wanted, at least not by our modeling and the much higher beta would suggest Warren doesn't want them either.

    * These stocks have a safety rating (SR) greater than 4, our cut-off point.

    Now to our test. We took the 986 stocks, their respective betas and their *2yr ARR then sorted by beta low down to high. To smooth data, we ran a moving 200 over the ARRs. As the chart below shows, the average ARR constantly rises and began to accelerate once 1.00, the index average, was past and continued to rise more steeply after that. So there you have it, stocks with a beta lower than 1.00, all other aspects being satisfactory, are likely to be good additions to your portfolio.

    * This Annualized Rates of Return (ARR) period closely corresponds to the period we do our beta calculation over.

Back To Barry North's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • interesting. I also think selective utility companies/insurance companies are recession proof.
    25 Jan, 03:58 PM Reply Like
  • Author’s reply » I agree, but not very exciting as investments propositions. I Googled utility companies and got this best 10 list for 2014.



    Our free website carries data for 8 of them and I will look at adding MGEE and NVE, if they look worthy of inclusion. I did a few average numbers of the 8 we cover and this is what I found:


    Av. Dividend Yield 3.4875%


    Free Cash Flow - Only 3 had any at all. Best was IDA at 19%. Lot of CAPEX spending keeping everything going.


    Debt to Equity Ratio - 103%, so they owe more than their breakup value, but they are good for it being utilities.


    Return of Total Capital - minus 2%. Giving it all back and more, as dividends.


    5 years Annualized rate of Return - 15.875%


    That last one is where they shine. Capital will double in less than 5 years at that rate, not bad these days.


    A retiree with a nest egg they want preserved and grow while getting a dividend stream, would be well suited to a portfolio of these.


    Thanks for the comment. I will have a look at the missing two...
    25 Jan, 05:01 PM Reply Like
  • Author’s reply » I should add as well another attractive feature, for those who don't like roller coaster investing, is their low average beta of 0.61.


    Also I am today, adding MGEE, but not NVE, so will have 9 to offer. In addition I will research how the group fared in the last market downturn, which was also a recession and hopefully show their recession proof attributes. Probably worth an article...
    25 Jan, 05:29 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments

Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.