Seeking Alpha

KennethY's  Instablog

KennethY
Send Message
Author of Investcraft.com. Investcraft is a Financial Blog that focuses on helping individual investors navigate through the complexities of the stock market. Both individuals hope to provide keen insights on the trends of the market as well as individual stock analysis. If you’re looking for... More
My company:
Investcraft.com
My blog:
Investcraft
  • Why the Old “Buy-and-Hold” Strategy Doesn’t Work 1 comment
    Apr 8, 2010 2:43 AM | about stocks: AAPL, NOK, GOOG, GOOG, YHOO, KODK
     Back in the year 1998, I remember my parents telling me to buy Nortel Networks Stock, hold it for years, and let it keep doing 2-for-1 stock splits until you’re rich. They said the same thing about Cisco, Intel, and Yahoo. If I listened to them, I’d be in pretty big trouble. So why exactly does the ole buy-and-hold strategy fail these days? Well, I think it’s pretty simple actually. Two things: Technology and Competition.

    Today’s stock market is really a global market. There are many foreign companies that get listed on the NASDAQ or NYSE and although they’re overseas, they trade on the US markets. 20 years ago, there were but a handful of foreign companies traded in the US. What that tells us is that today’s market is so much more competitive. Foreign companies are competing against US companies for market share and in many cases, winning. In today’s ever increasing competitive landscape, you can’t simply buy the market leader and expect to make a nice return in 20 years. There’s so much uncertainty over competition that you just can’t be sure that the same market leader today will be the market leader 20 years from now. You could do that a lot easier back in the 80’s and 90’s because there just weren’t that many competitors and the barrier to entry was high. With the dawn of the internet, that barrier has come down significantly.

    The rapid advancement of technology has also made it very difficult for any industry leader to stay on top. If you bought Yahoo! stock in 1999, you’d be picking the market leader at the time. But Google came along and now Yahoo is struggling and has seen its share of the search engine market drastically shrink. But does that mean if you bought Google today, they’d still have the roughly 75% of the search market in 20 years? I don’t know. But if history tells us anything, you’d probably lean towards “no”. Why? Because it’s just as likely that some no-name company could probably come along and invent something revolutionary that will blow Google away just as Google did to Yahoo! with it’s “pagerank” algorithm. One simple invention or a new popular product can change the industry landscape almost overnight. Just look at Twitter and Facebook.

    Another example is Apple Computers. They came out with the iPhone which revolutionized the marketplace for mobile phones. The market leaders 10 years ago (i.e. Nokia, Motorola, etc) are now struggling just to stay in the game. Technology is just so unpredictable and that in turn, makes investing in tech companies very risky.

    Technology has really transformed the way people invest these days. Sure, we had many technology advancements 50 years ago too, but the pace of the advancements were much slower-paced than they are today. Success for a market leader has more to do with how they adapt to the changing technologies rather than the sheer size of their market share. For example, Eastman Kodak, which relied on it’s traditional film business, was a market leader in the camera business. They’ve been public since 1962 and have been synonymous with “pictures” and “cameras” (i.e. Kodak moment) in popular culture. But they had a very tough time adapting their business once digital cameras became popular. Very few people these days use regular film cameras anymore — it’s all digital now. Kodak’s financial viability came into question just 2 years ago because they failed to adapt the new trends. A public company for almost 50 years, their stock price plunged to around $2 per share just last year. Luckily for them, they made the changes to their business in time to survive, but are still struggling today.

    So there you have it. Don’t count on the buy-and-hold strategy in the age of global economies, fierce competition, and lightning-fast technological changes. If your’e not careful, you might buy the market leader only to find out they’ve gone belly-up 10 years later!



    Disclosure: I am long EK
    Stocks: AAPL, NOK, GOOG, GOOG, YHOO, KODK
Back To KennethY's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • sontum
    , contributor
    Comments (2) | Send Message
     
    Right you are, that means look at the margins of a company. If the margins are higher than average, that will not last. Someone will make sure those margins goes down. In the financial world that means companies with higher than average margins, and with pricing that suggest that they will continue to increase are clear sells, the opposite is then also true. Not for short term trades but one of the best strategies you can do.
    9 Apr 2010, 03:25 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

Latest Comments


Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.