Seeking Alpha

Paul Novell's  Instablog

Paul Novell
Send Message
Retired 42yr old semiconductor industry exec. Currently living in my RV traveling the US. 'Working' part time managing my retirement portfolio and making sure it lasts forever! Writing a blog about my investments and managing a retirement portfolio.
My blog:
Investing for a Living
  • Investing in another lost decade 0 comments
    Sep 20, 2010 12:47 PM | about stocks: RDS.B, NGG, AT

    I believe we are in another lost decade for stocks, i.e. that 10 yrs from now the S&P 500 would be at the same level it is today. This investment outlook is based on my thoughts for overall economic growth, which drives profit growth and thus stock returns, over the long run, combined with a secular bear market that drives valuation compression even in the face of moderate economic growth.

    Where does this view come from? My favorite source for economic analysis is Dave Rosenberg, Chief Economist at Gluskin-Sheff. Rosenberg is probably everyone’s favorite bear. He has been more right than wrong over the last decade and he backs up his views with great analysis. As a counterpoint, I read Brian Wesbury, Chief Economist at First Trust. Brian is definitely a glass half-full kind of guy and is much more bullish than Rosenberg. In my opinion his analysis is not as good as Rosenberg’s and neither is his track record. Yet he makes many good points about the positive points in the economy of which there always are many.

    But probably the main reason I side with Rosenberg is that in managing a retirement portfolio in retirement where you are withdrawing money every year it pays to lean to safety. As Warren Buffet says, the first rule of investment is  don’t lose money – the second rule is to remember the first rule. Wealth protection is job #1. Negative returns are anathema to a retiree, in particular an early retiree (with a 40+ year retirement period) and early in your retirement years. A $1M retirement portfolio that takes a 20% hit in the first year is a lot worse than a portfolio that takes a 20% hit in year 20!

    Thus, I lean towards a pessimistic outlook and focus on doing well in such an environment. If I’m wrong and there is more upside great. What I need to minimize is the chance of being wrong to the downside. In this light where does one look for solid investments with chances for upside. I think Rosenberg has it right with his SIRP (Safe Income at Reasonable Price) strategy. In his latest update he lays it out pretty clearly:

    1. Focus on safe yield: High-quality corporates (non-cyclical, high cash reserves, minimal refinancing needs). Corporate balance sheets are in very good shape.
    2. Equities: focus on reliable dividend growth/yield; preferred shares (“income” orientation). Starbucks just caught on to the importance of paying out a dividend.
    3. Whether it be credit or equities, focus on companies with low debt/equity ratios and high liquid asset ratios – balance sheet quality is even more important than usual. Avoid highly leveraged companies.
    4. Even hard assets that provide an income stream work well in a deflationary environment (ie, oil and gas royalties, REITs, etc…).
    5. Focus on sectors or companies with these micro characteristics: low fixed costs, high variable cost, high barriers to entry/some sort of oligopolistic features, a relatively high level of demand inelasticity (utilities, staples, health care — these sectors are also unloved and under owned by institutional portfolio managers).
    6. Alternative assets: allocate significant portion of asset mix to strategies that are not reliant on rising equity markets and where volatility can be used to advantage.
    7. Precious metals: A hedge against the reflationary policies aimed at defusing deflationary risks — money printing, rolling currency depreciations, heightened trade frictions, and government procurement policies.

    With that in mind I plan my portfolio allocation and choose my investments. Right now a lot of attention and money has gone into income oriented investments so many are fairly to slightly over-valued based on history. But in relation to a sub 3% 10yr, maybe not. A few of my favorite investments right now that I consider undervalued are:

    RDS.B - big oil in turnaround mode with a great approx 6% yield.
    NGG - UK based utility, also with US assets, recently beaten down, offering a 6%ish yield
    AT - Atlantic Power, merchant provider of electricity. Approx 8% div with consistent outlook to 2015.

    Disclosure: Long NGG

    Disclosure: Long NGG
    Stocks: RDS.B, NGG, AT
Back To Paul Novell's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.