David Moenning's  Instablog

David Moenning
Send Message
David Moenning is a the proprietor of StateoftheMarkets.com. In addition to providing free and subscription-based portfolios on "State", Dave is a full-time money manager and the President and Chief Investment Strategist of a Chicago-based Registered Investment Advisory firm. Dave... More
My company:
StateoftheMarkets.com
My blog:
Daily State of the Markets
  • The Valuation Debate: Robert Shiller Is Very Worried 2 comments
    Aug 18, 2014 9:01 AM

    Daily State of the Markets
    Monday, August 18, 2014

    The topic of the day from a short-term perspective is the state of the geopolitical issues in Ukraine/Russia and to a lesser extent Iraq and Gaza/Israel. The way this game is played is simple, really. When headlines speak of troop movements, stocks go down. Then when the news wire reports that tensions have eased (as is the case this morning), stocks go up. And most importantly, it is vital to remember that once the geopolitical issue that captured the market's attention for a spell is over, oftentimes so too is the corrective phase brought on by the bad news.

    Will the news that Ukraine and Russia have come to some sort of agreement on the convoy of humanitarian aid mean that traders and their fancy trading machines will soon turn their attention to something else? Will the easing of tensions mean another round of new highs for the major stock indices? Time will tell, of course. But things are looking up around the globe on Monday morning.

    The Bigger Picture Concern - Valuations

    However, from a longer-term perspective, the current level of stock market valuations is quickly becoming a topic of interest amongst analysts. Therefore, we will continue the thorough review of valuation indicators - something that could take a week or two to complete.

    In fact, Nobel-Prize winner Robert Shiller wrote a piece in this weekend's New York Times suggesting that stocks "look very expensive right now" and that investors should be worried.

    "The CAPE ratio, a stock-price measure I helped develop - is hovering at a worrisome level...nothing I've come up with is a slam-dunk explanation for the continuing high level of valuations. I suspect that the real answers lie largely in the realm of sociology and social psychology - in phenomena like irrational exuberance, which, eventually, has always faded before. If the mood changes again, stock market investments may disappoint us."

    The CAPE Ratio

    In case you are not aware, Shiller's CAPE ratio - the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio - is a long-term valuation metric designed to adjust for inflation.

    According to Wikipedia, "The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, commonly known as CAPE, Shiller P/E, or P/E 10 ratio, is a valuation measure usually applied to broad equity markets. It is defined as price divided by the average of ten years of earnings (Moving average), adjusted for inflation."

    In addition to Shiller's own warning that his CAPE Ratio is worrisome right, a handful of analysts, including Ned Davis, have also noted that the CAPE is currently flashing a warning.

    Before we continue with the analysis, there is one important caveat to provide in relation to the CAPE. In Shiller's own words, "The CAPE was never intended to indicate exactly when to buy and to sell. The market could remain at these valuations for years." In fact, Shiller penned a piece for the times more than a year ago noting that the CAPE Ratio had reached worrisome levels.

    Are Investors Sailing Into Cape Fear?

    The key point to Shiller's weekend article in the NYT is that the CAPE Ratio is currently above the 25.5 level. There are two reasons why this may be noteworthy from a long-term perspective.

    First, according to Shiller, the average reading for the CAPE Ratio since 1900 has been... survey says... 15.21. The low end of the range has been about 5, a level that was seen in the early 1920's and 1930's. In more recent times, the low seen in 1982 was near 7 and the low in 2008 was about 13.

    In looking at more than a century of data, the high end of the range for the CAPE prior to the 1990's had been the extreme move seen in the roaring 1920's. And if one excludes the spike to 34 during that period, the high-water mark was more like 23-25 until the mid-1990's

    The second key point that Shiller makes is that the CAPE Ratio has only been higher than the current level three other times in history: 1929, 2000, and 2007. Yikes.

    History shows that in all three prior instances, the stock market moved higher BEFORE a bear market ensued. But... the bear markets the followed such lofty levels of the CAPE were some of the nastiest on record.

    For example, in the 1928 example, the S&P 500 moved higher for nearly a year before succumbing to the Crash of 1929. In 1996, stocks moved higher for more than two years before the technology bubble bear began. And in the 2007 example, the market moved higher for 45 months after the CAPE first reached the worrisome levels.

    In addition, it is worth noting that since 1995, the CAPE ratio has spent the majority if the time either at or below 25.

    The Key Takeaway

    In short, Shiller's main point is this, "...we should recognize that we are in an unusual period, and that it's time to ask some serious questions about it."

    Next we will explore several more variations on the P/E ratio as well as several other valuation indicators in order to get a good feel for the data on the subject.

    Publishing Note: After spending an inordinate amount of time on airplanes this year for business, it is finally time to take some R&R. My wife and I are traveling through Iceland, England and Scotland for the next two and one-half weeks. Thus, I will publish reports only as time permits or as conditions warrant.

    Turning To This Morning

    The news flow overnight has been positive. First and foremost there is word that Russia and Ukraine have come to an agreement on the Russian convoy of 280 trucks carrying humanitarian aid trying to enter the Ukraine. In addition, foreign ministers from Russia, Ukraine, Germany, and France made "some progress" in talks over the weekend to resolve the Ukraine/Russia crisis. In response, global markets as well as futures in the U.S. are nice shade of green in the early going.

    Pre-Game Indicators

    Here are the Pre-Market indicators we review each morning before the opening bell...

    Major Foreign Markets:
    - Japan: +0.03%
    - Hong Kong: +0.00%
    - Shanghai: +0.55%
    - London: +0.78%
    - Germany: +1.41%
    - France: +1.17%
    - Italy: +0.79%
    - Spain: +1.07%

    Crude Oil Futures: -$0.80 to $96.55

    Gold: -$7.40 at $1298.80

    Dollar: lower against the yen and pound, higher vs. euro.

    10-Year Bond Yield: Currently trading at 2.374%

    Stock Indices in U.S. (relative to fair value):
    - S&P 500: +10.69
    - Dow Jones Industrial Average: +88
    - NASDAQ Composite: +19.79

    Thought For The Day:

    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance.

    Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,

    David D. Moenning
    President, Chief Investment Officer
    Heritage Capital Research
    Check Out the NEW Website!

    Positions in stocks mentioned: none

    Follow Me on Twitter: @StateDave (Twitter is the new Ticker Tape)

    Advertisement
    Will You Be Ready For The NEXT Bear Market?

    Heritage Capital Research's NextGen Active Risk Manager Can Help
    Contact Heritage for more information or call us at (847) 807-3590


    The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

    Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

    The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

    David D. Moenning, an advisor representative of CONCERT Wealth Management Inc. (CONCERT), is founder of Heritage Capital Advisors LLC, a legal business entity doing business as Heritage Capital Research (Heritage). Advisory services are offered through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc., an SEC registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services review the CONCERT firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available from your Investment Representative or by contacting Heritage or CONCERT.

    Mr. Moenning is also the owner of Heritage Capital Management (NASDAQ:HCM) a state-registered investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Neither HCM, Heritage, or CONCERT is registered as a broker-dealer.

    Employees and affiliates of Heritage and HCM may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or Heritage/HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

    Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

Back To David Moenning's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (2)
Track new comments
  • Great Swami
    , contributor
    Comments (1108) | Send Message
     
    The big issue I have with the cape ratio is how much it is skewed by earnings wreckage of 08 and 09.
    Wonder what it would be if those two anomalies we thrown out and then recalculated
    19 Aug 2014, 10:11 PM Reply Like
  • David Moenning
    , contributor
    Comments (641) | Send Message
     
    Author’s reply » Excellent point... the CAPE is indeed skewed by 08. However, since it was such a short period of time, the overall average since 1900 isn't dramatically affected. Bottom line, the index is still high, but it can go higher.
    20 Aug 2014, 09:18 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

More »

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.