Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Still Long Despite the Ugliness, Now Switching Long Into "Low-Quality" Stocks

Jun. 23, 2010 11:48 AM ETSPY, KMX
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.
We exited cash and went 100% long on stocks on June 17, following our signals. These signals are still very solidly in the long position despite the recent ugliness. As a result, the portfolios look pretty ugly for the MTD - down about 2-4%, and would look a little uglier if we did not catch a nice lift in CarMax (KMX) after being added to the S&P 500 index today. In addition, we got a new signal at the close yesterday -- to switch out of "high-quality" stocks and into "low-quality" stocks.

The last time we got such a signal was on July 21, 2009 on a back test, and that "low-quality" long switcheroo lasted 14 trading days until August 7, 2009. During that time, the market rallied 6.24% from 951.13 from the close on July 20 to 1010.48 at the close of August 7, and our unleveraged "low-quality" model portfolio appreciated 15.11%. Currently it looks like our models are suggesting a 3-day long trade into low-quality stocks.

There are a lot of ugly news reports out there. While our technical models do not jive with what we are reading and listening to on the news, we have learned that it rarely pays to be dissuaded away from the consistent approach that we have spent thousands of man hours developing. Currently we are trying to figure out the optimal number and type of stocks to do this trade; it will be somewhere between 20 and 50 stocks, equal weighted.



Disclosure: KMX

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You