Steve Zachritz, "Zman", is an investor/trader who specializes in the energy sector. He has managed small cap growth portfolios, been an energy banker, and a sell side exploration and production analyst (Prudential and Jefferies) in his 20 years in the financial markets. His daily... More
This is a tiny Rockies focused E&P participant with toeholds in the Williston Basin (both the East Montana and North Dakota Bakken plays), the DJ Basin (Colorado, Codell / Niobrara) and in South Texas and along the Texas Gulf Coast (see more property details below but when I say tiny, I mean tiny). Management is experienced (ex Amoco) and the firm, as small as it is, is profitable and not overly leveraged like many of the E&P minnows that simply should not be public. When I look at the super small players within the single digit midget E&P universe I have to adjust my thinking on metrics of valuation and on what would normally seem inconsequential in terms of volumes from new projects. I also have to think about the fact that the shares are extremely thin and trade essentially by appointment. In other words, it would probably be difficult to obtain a position of size without moving the name and equally difficult to get out.
How the market views the company:
Total Enterprise Value of $16.9 mm
Working Capital = $4.7 mm
with $4.97 mm in cash ($0.29 / share)
Debt = $3.9 mm
total debt to cap of 25%,
but with net debt to cap less than 0% due to the cash
Nothing off balance sheet except for a small 5 year office lease.
Credit Line
$20 mm with a borrowing based set to $4 mm currently
$0 drawn.
Only 16.9 mm shares out
Insiders hold 28% with CEO Singleton holding 26%
Only trades 11,500 shares on average … again, truly tiny
Management:
President and CEO Ray Singleton, petroleum engineer, former Amoco drilling, completion and production engineer. After that he ran a engineering consultancy before coming to Earthstone in 1988.
Otherwise they have 8 other employees including a contractor for an accountant.
G&A and salaries involved here are not high
Instead of rushing out to lease acreage Singleton has seen fit to buy back shares and hoard a small amount of cash, without tapping his credit lines.
They have maintained production but not managed to grow it either.
What have they been up to?
Reserves:
970,000 BOE; 84% oil
Reserves engineered by Ryder Scott which is the best in the business
On a TEV / Reserves basis, they are relatively cheap (especially given the oiliness of the reserves) at $13.—
Production – drifting …
What is the plan now and where are they drilling?
Looking for oily deals in the Rockies including acreage packages and auction in October. They have recently add some acreage and have a couple of bids out on asset packages.
They continue to target DJ Basin gas and Bakken oil with smallish non-operated interests.
They have a couple of wells we could get rates on in the near term, both in the Bakken.–
Banks Prospect Area (McKensie County, North Dakota)
The first well is operated by ZEnergy, the Pederson 10-3H well, just to the east of BEXP's Rough Rider area, and gross production should be north of 500 boepd IP when it comes off confidential status.
This is where it is important to remember that scale comment above
ZEnergy also will spud a second well in the Banks area in October.
Brigham (BEXP) also bought out the acreage of one of their small, private partners who operated, and is planning to spud 1 or 2 wells prior to year end which would give BSIC a small interest in each.
BSIC has 13,000 gross (845) net acres in the area and the move by BEXP here will insure that they continue to develop it.
Indian Hill Field (McKensie County, North Dakota)
The second soon to be announced well is a longer lateral Bakken test (probably 10,000 foot) operated by SM. BSIC has a "small" interest here but we should get the results on or before SM's 3Q press release.
BSIC has 192 net acres here.
Divide County, ND / Sheridan County, Montana
2400 net acres in the way of the migration
The Complete Acreage Snapshot
They plan to get listed on a national exchange by year end … will require a reverse split to get there.
Nutshell. At present, valuation is probably what I'd call fair on a "reserves in the ground" basis. If I put low, low $/acre figures on their leasehold (say $2,000 per acre in ND and $1,000 per acre in Montana) I can get to ta number 20% over their market cap before we start to talk about other acreage. Unlike some of the small and microcap Bakken players we follow, this nano-cap does not hold small or medium sized tracts of acreage that may or may not be prospective the latest hot play. Instead they hold slivers in some of the hot plays. Just enough to get them small working interests as the big name, long lateral, high stage frac count boys roll over their land to prove up their big, largely (but not entirely) contiguous acreage positions. BSIC is trying to get in front of more of this type of action. I don't own it but I find it interesting, as the smallest public non-operated Bakken and maybe Niobrara player I can find.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha
community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors,
in contrast to contributors' articles.
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Earthstone Energy, Inc. (BSIC) – Bakken Minnow With Big Fish Dreams - Part 1 1 comment
This is a tiny Rockies focused E&P participant with toeholds in the Williston Basin (both the East Montana and North Dakota Bakken plays), the DJ Basin (Colorado, Codell / Niobrara) and in South Texas and along the Texas Gulf Coast (see more property details below but when I say tiny, I mean tiny). Management is experienced (ex Amoco) and the firm, as small as it is, is profitable and not overly leveraged like many of the E&P minnows that simply should not be public. When I look at the super small players within the single digit midget E&P universe I have to adjust my thinking on metrics of valuation and on what would normally seem inconsequential in terms of volumes from new projects. I also have to think about the fact that the shares are extremely thin and trade essentially by appointment. In other words, it would probably be difficult to obtain a position of size without moving the name and equally difficult to get out.
How the market views the company:
Management:
What have they been up to?
What is the plan now and where are they drilling?
- They plan to get listed on a national exchange by year end … will require a reverse split to get there.
Nutshell. At present, valuation is probably what I'd call fair on a "reserves in the ground" basis. If I put low, low $/acre figures on their leasehold (say $2,000 per acre in ND and $1,000 per acre in Montana) I can get to ta number 20% over their market cap before we start to talk about other acreage. Unlike some of the small and microcap Bakken players we follow, this nano-cap does not hold small or medium sized tracts of acreage that may or may not be prospective the latest hot play. Instead they hold slivers in some of the hot plays. Just enough to get them small working interests as the big name, long lateral, high stage frac count boys roll over their land to prove up their big, largely (but not entirely) contiguous acreage positions. BSIC is trying to get in front of more of this type of action. I don't own it but I find it interesting, as the smallest public non-operated Bakken and maybe Niobrara player I can find.Disclosure: LONG BSIC.ob
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
Share this Instablog
This post has 1 comment:
Latest Followers
Latest Comments
Most Commented
Posts by Themes