Philip Davis'  Instablog

Philip Davis
Send Message is the fastest growing stock and option newsletter on the Web. "High Finance for Real People - Fun and Profits" is our motto and our Basic and Premium Chat Sessions offer readers a chance to speak to Phil live during the trading day as well as authors like Optrader, Sabrient,... More
My company:
Phil's Stock World
My blog:
Phil's Stock World
  • Thoughtful Thursday - What's Our Money Worth?  11 comments
    May 5, 2011 9:30 AM | about stocks: DIA, EWJ, GLD, SPY, USO, UUP

    How low can we go? 

    I made a bottom call on the Dollar at 73 (and a top call on the markets) last week, not because the Dollar is strong but because the alternatives aren't so hot either.  While we have dipped a bit below that line, we are in serious danger of recovering now and I say danger because - as I have pointed out in Tuesday's post and discussed yesterday as well and as we have long been discussing in Stock World Weekly, the recent equity and commodity gains are nothing more than an illusion based on the fact that their value has been calculated in an ever-weakening dollar.    

    This is not a small correlation - this is almost an exact correlation between the Dollar (using the UUP ultra-ETF), the S&P (red), oil (green) and gold (gold - that one worked out).  I couldn't put silver (NYSEARCA:SLV) on the chart because silver is up a ridiculous 120% in the same period and distorts the rest (was 170% last week) but you can view that set here.  Note how we're pulling back this week just because the Dollar STOPPED going lower - what will happen if it actually goes higher?

    As I pointed out on Monday, silver was beyond ridiculous when you look at it in terms of the value of your home.  The "value" of your home has dropped 78% when priced in silver in just 3 years.  Are we to extrapolate that in 3 more years you will have to accept an pound of silver for your home?  Surely you have more silver IN YOUR HOME than that!  

    Homes are something people NEED, food is another thing people NEED, fuel is something people WANT, while metals are things people DESIRE.  Thus, as we move from NEED to DESIRE, prices are able to get less and less realistic.  This is, in part because we do not have enough metals or even fuel to fulfill everyone's desires but food is grown and houses are built as the need arises.  Yes there are occasional gluts and shortages but, Malthus aside (and, over 100 years later, can we finally put that aside?), we make enough stuff to fulfill people's needs - most shortages are a distribution problem - including starvation in Africa, a problem that was addressed accurately by the late Sam Kinnison:  

    Of course pricing, supply, demand, production, etc. is all very complex - I hear they have entire Masters programs studying this sort of thing but, unfortunately, something goes very, very wrong in these schools because the only thing you can count on when you survey Economists is that none of them will have a clue about what an economic number is going to be. In fact, you would think that these jokers actually have a degree in Bistromathics rather than Economics, the way they routinely miss EVERY SINGLE projection on EVERY SINGLE economic data point.  

    Gold Certificate SealAnyway - so what is the VALUE of a Dollar?  The Dollar, like all World currencies, is a "fiat currency" which is a fancy way of saying "totally bullshit."  No one likes to talk about this (except gold bugs) because, to the average citizen, this is a fairly shocking concept but the money you have in your pocket and all those digital Dollars, Yen, Pounds or Yuan you have in your bank accounts are nothing more than arbitrary numerical records of transactions and each individual note is literally not worth the paper it is written on OTHER THAN the faith you have in the issuing government not to "cheat."

    After World War II, the Brenton Woods Accord fixed the value of a Dollar at 1/35th of an ounce of gold and other major currencies had similar fixes.  The Dollar became the global reserve currency because Europe (including Russia) and Japan were effectively broke and has massive rebuilding to do (so deficit spending) and China, at the time, was a non-entity while the US was able to do massive stimulus spending on infrastructure, which provided millions of jobs and paved (literally) the way for decades future growth.  

    Unfortunately, in the late 60's, the US went to war in Vietnam while, at the same time, Nixon cut taxes, this quickly snowballed into a disaster that made it impossible to maintain the Dollar peg to gold as the amount of gold in US reserves (Fort Knox, etc) fell from 55% of the amount required to cash US currency at 1/35th of an ounce to just 22%.  Washington's solution to deficit spending at the time was to print more money and we quickly got into an inflation spiral to which Nixon reacted with wage and price controls as well as a 10% import surcharge to help balance our Trade Deficit (also made worse by the weak Dollar).



     As the war dragged on, the money kept going overseas and gold began to skyrocket to the Dollar, running from $15 an ounce in 1969, when Nixon took office, to over $70 an ounce in early 1973 and, at that point, Brenton Woods collapsed (the "Nixon Shock") and the S&P 500 fell from 120 in January of 1972 (the market was in a huge inflationary rally) to 63 in July of 1974 (down 48%).  Keep in mind this was THE SAME THING that is happening now:  Tax cuts 1968 (108), market crash 1970 (70, down 35%), money printing, inflation and market rally 1973 (120, up 70%), followed by another crash back to 60 over the next 18 months (down 50%).  It's a good thing we learned our lesson and would never do that again, right?

    So that's the background to where we are now.  I'll have to finish this discussion tomorrow, or mainly on the weekend as we try to determine the "right" value for our currency but, at the moment, it's a game of relativity.  It has been apparent to us for most of April that Japan, China and Europe are in no better shape than we are and we pressed our short bets in the $25KP last week and took many disaster hedges to cover a RISE in the Dollar, which we though would be catastrophic for the markets.  

    Don't forget UUP, which has an almost even correlation to the S&P and oil, is an Ultra ETF, which moves 2x to the Dollar so a very small move in the Dollar of 5%, can send UUP 10% higher - if the correlation remains intact, we're looking at a 10% S&P correction off a 5% bounce in the Dollar, back to 76.65.  If the Dollar recovers to 80 - the S&P can wind up down 5% for the year all of a sudden.  

    As we expected, the ECB did NOT tighten rates - they can't, for reasons we have discussed for weeks in Member Chat.  Not only that but Trichet gave no indication that he would be raising rates soon so the Dollar bears have almost nothing to hang their hats on - other than the very pathetic state of our own economy.  German factory orders fell 4% in March vs a 0.4% gain expected by "Economists" but a 1,000% miss is par for the course in "the dismal science."   

    We are going to have a weak open and, if the markets don't recover during the day, we're going to have a big problem in the morning as the Nikkei has been closed since Monday and will reopen tomorrow with the Yen under 80 to the Dollar and 82 is about the level that causes exporters to go into a dive.  Not only that but the Nikkei closed Monday MORNING from our perspective so the last they saw, the Dow was at 12,900 in the futures so down about 300 as of this morning means we can look for a similar snap in the Nikkei down from that critical 10,000 mark - a gap down rejection that will not sit well with the technical traders after their silly gap up to hit 10,000 on Monday.  

    In fact, if people see that, they might get the impression that these market movements were bullshit....

    Be careful out there! 


    Stocks: DIA, EWJ, GLD, SPY, USO, UUP
Back To Philip Davis' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (11)
Track new comments
  • Born Free Taxed To Death
    , contributor
    Comments (372) | Send Message
    Thank you, voice of reason.
    5 May 2011, 10:10 AM Reply Like
  • ebworthen
    , contributor
    Comments (2799) | Send Message
    You are leaving out the huge cost of the LBJ social programs that ramped up Welfare and Food Stamps in the late 60's which now 44 million Americans are on. Good thing for WalMart and Kroger I suppose, but not the nation or the deficit.


    However, watching Wall Street and the Corporatocracy and Kleptoligarchy rob the average citizen blind the past 10 years you can't really blame the people availing themselves of it, can you?


    Too bad we don't have free markets or the rule of law anymore or things might not be so perverted and sad.
    5 May 2011, 11:25 AM Reply Like
  • GreenRiver
    , contributor
    Comments (3846) | Send Message
    Welfare and Food Stamps cost about $100B in 2010. Less than 3% of the federal budget. About one third of the revenue lost via the Bush tax cuts for the same year.


    But THAT'S what's busting the budget, not the Bush tax cuts, prescription drug benefits for seniors, out of control medical costs, 3 ill-advised and unending wars in the middel east, and a defense department still preparing for WWIII against an enemy that no longer exists.


    I know EXACTLY how to balance the budget. We'll just shoot everyone when they're too old, weak, or sick to pull their weight. That should really restore America's economy.
    5 May 2011, 12:24 PM Reply Like
  • Mercado
    , contributor
    Comments (97) | Send Message
    Umm.. guys I know this sounds crazy but May Day has been initiated and orders are to rise the cloud. False flag event coming near you.
    5 May 2011, 11:35 AM Reply Like
  • Jim P. Smith
    , contributor
    Comments (436) | Send Message
    HAHAHAHAH!!!!! I thought I was the only one who would think of that Sam Kinnison reference! LMAO! I haven't thought about that stand up bit in YEARS!


    Thanks for the memories. Have You Seen Me Lately?
    5 May 2011, 02:51 PM Reply Like
  • Rookie IRA Investor
    , contributor
    Comments (2863) | Send Message
    I never understand why wars cost so much money.


    Surely military salaries, pensions, food, medical benefits, etc. are fixed costs. Does all the money go on fuel and munitions? Perhaps more warmongering could be done in house to prevent expensive payments to private contractors.


    Or is it needed for bribes. I understand gifts of Viagra have been well received in Afghanistan, but how about cutting taxpayer costs by using Indian generics?


    Before he was so famous, in a positively Shakerspearean speech in 2002, Barack Obama said :


    "I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences..."


    "...You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings."


    Where was the Tea Party when Barack Obama was the only fiscal conservative in the country?
    5 May 2011, 09:03 PM Reply Like
  • GreenRiver
    , contributor
    Comments (3846) | Send Message
    Much of the cost of the war is maintance and repair of equipment. One of my customers is a company that manufactures shock absorbers. The shocks on your passenger car might cost $40 bucks each. The shocks on a Humvee or MRAP are more like $1000. And I've seen what goes into them. They aren't cheap-ass stamped sheet metal like the ones on your car, the entire assembly is precision machined components of high strength steel and aluminum alloys, there is a rigorous vendor qualification process, and every finished assembly goes through a rigorous QC process. I'm surprised that they can be made as cheaply as they are, considering the procurement requirements, which are written by DOD. And there is good reason. A broken shock on your care is no big deal. At worst, you're broke down on the side of the road, waiting for tow. But you DON'T want to be broke down, waiting for a tow, on the side of the road, in FALUJISTAN. And, to boot, a production run might be 8 or 12 thousand units, not the millions made for the auto industry.


    A lot of the rest is the cost of the supply line. A gallon of diesel fuel costs about 4 bucks in the US, but get that gallon of diesel out to the tip of the spear, and its more like 40. Or more.
    6 May 2011, 07:53 AM Reply Like
  • Rookie IRA Investor
    , contributor
    Comments (2863) | Send Message
    Meanwhile the Taliban are running around in bog standard Toyota trucks and making their own gasoline out of poppies.


    Iraq has some of the cheapest gasoline in the world. Can't the military just pull over at the local Texaco instead of flying fuel in from the Gulf of Mexico?


    If I was President I would be telling the military: "No more wars for you until you can make each war a profit center."
    6 May 2011, 08:17 AM Reply Like
  • GreenRiver
    , contributor
    Comments (3846) | Send Message
    You wanna put local fuel of unknown origin and quality in the $500,000 turbine engine of a $4.5M M1A1 Abrams?


    In case you didn't notice, we're in hostile territory over there. I don't want my convoy pinned down because the local fuel is full of trash and all our fuel filters loaded with trash.


    The locals can get by with locally available equipment and supplies, because if their Toyota breaks down, they can walk home. Its a long (and dangerous) walk from Kabul to Kentucky.
    6 May 2011, 08:31 AM Reply Like
  • Gaping hole in the ocean
    , contributor
    Comments (210) | Send Message
    Perhaps the question is, how many $4.5M M1A1s do you need against an army of Toyota pickups?


    I'm all for a well equiped and ready military but it is becoming painfully obvious that we could scale back the war machine a tad for the time being.
    6 May 2011, 01:30 PM Reply Like
  • GreenRiver
    , contributor
    Comments (3846) | Send Message
    I think we've mostly made the transition from up-armored HUMVEE's to MRAP's. But when the enemy can put a hundred kilos of HE or ANFO in the culvert you're about to drive across, do YOU want to be patrolling in a Toyota pickup?
    6 May 2011, 02:05 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.