SA Editor Jonat...'s  Instablog

SA Editor Jonathan Liss
Send Message
  • Trying to Beat the Market? Don't Bother 2 comments
    Apr 20, 2009 2:37 PM

    Index Universe - a great resource for ETF and mutual fund investors - just put out an analysis of the latest Standard & Poor's Index Versus Active Fund Scorecard and the results aren't pretty. According to Index Universe,

    The new report shows that 71.9% of actively managed large-cap funds trailed the S&P 500; 75.9% of actively managed mid-cap funds trailed the S&P MidCap 400; and a stunning 85.5% of actively managed small-cap funds trailed the S&P SmallCap 600.

    S&P says the results were consistent with the previous five-year cycle, from 1999 to 2003.

    The article goes on to describe what can really only be described as pathetic performance of active mutual funds across various market cap sizes, global funds (including emerging markets where the performance of actively managed funds was especially attrocious compared to their index peers) and the bond market. One notable exception to the general rule of underperformance came in the high yield bond market. Other than that, the performance of actively managed funds vs. their passively indexed peers was either bad or awful.

    Which leads me to wonder: Why does anyone bother trying to beat the market? Or to focus that, it's one thing for the pros to try - they have to believe they do what they do because they're really good at it (even if that's clearly not true year in and out). But why do individual, amateur investors try to beat the market? It seems like an excersize in futility at best and more likely than not, a surefire way to underperform the markets.

    The bottom line is this: the average retail investor would be much better served buying the right mix of assets through low priced ETFs (expense ratios are the one factor most investors can - and often fail to - control). In addition to the added free time they'll gain (don't they say that time is money), they can rest assured they won't be underperforming the markets. Then they can spend their time evaluating what level of risk they can tolerate - something which came as a shock to many who thought it was much higher than it really was during the recent downturn. Switching into low-risk bonds when they Dow fell below 10,000 would have been a much more fruitful strategy for most than trying to outmaneuver a sinking ship of a market over the last year and a half.

Back To SA Editor Jonathan Liss' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • Miriam Metzinger
    , contributor
    Comments (18) | Send Message
    Great article Jonathan!
    you are wonders why the average investor didn't play it more safe when we started seeing waves in the market. However, there is the CNBC factor, which keeps pumping up investor confidence, correctly or incorrectly...
    21 Apr 2009, 02:44 PM Reply Like
  • stuart wechsler
    , contributor
    Comments (4) | Send Message
    Good advice. From any angle Investing with the pros is not a good idea. Aside from the numbers the mutual funds do not take into account tax issues for different investors,and the exorbitant fees they charge,the effect of which are not taken into account.
    7 Jul 2013, 11:05 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.