Long Term Inves...'s  Instablog

Long Term Investment Management
Send Message
Long Term Investment Management represent the thoughts of Alessandro Sajwani, a Senior Investment Advisor for a large European Bank. This site selects a sample of articles from the Long Term Investment Management blog. I was originally trained in Physics, where I went on to research the optical... More
My blog:
Long Term Investment Management
  • Summary of recent thoughts 1 comment
    Jun 11, 2010 5:06 AM


    Dear
    Advisory Client,


    As
    you well know, we have been strong proponents of maintaining a conservative asset allocation in your portfolio to ensure we had a large cash position to buy good assets at good prices at a later date.


    Well
    , as markets keep falling, that date gets closer.


    Year
    to date (YTD) we have maintained, on average, the following asset allocation (we include the USD discretionary portfolio management (DPM) balanced risk profile asset allocation for reference):-


    Asset class
    Advisory client % in asset (average)          
    DPM balanced USD  in asset               


    Cash             OVERWEIGHT
    30%                                                  
    02%                             

    Bonds           OVERWEIGHT
    30%                                                
    27%                              

    Equities         UNDERWEIGHT 
    30%                                              
    50%                              

    Alternatives    UNDERWEIGHT       
    10%                                       
    22%                            


    Many
    of you have received personal communication from myself recently with regards to purchasing certain stocks that offer good value and an interesting dividend yield in the current low interest rate environment.  

     

    We focus on common stocks of companies that show the attributes of being "high quality". This subjective concept attempts to encapsulate the idea of companies that are not likely to disappear in difficult times (i.e. have relatively little debt to equity), generate satisfactory and consistent free cash flows so have sufficient liquidity, and respectable returns on capital: all the while we attempt to buy this package at a reasonable price.


    Over
    the last 2 weeks we have increased the portion of assets in equities for a number of clients. Indeed, if I were to reduce our approach as crudely as possible, I would suggest increasing your equity position by 5% each time the market drops by 10%.


    We
    maintain as a marker for fair value the S&P 500 index at 950. It remains stubbornly over valued (for the moment) in my opinion.


    We
    remain wary of emerging market equities, believing them to be still "excitingly" priced at the moment. We have seen 10-20% wiped off the value of emerging market indices YTD, and we expect to see more before putting cash into such assets.


    Bond
    yields are still too low to gather our interest. There is simply too large a possibility to make an error in investing when you make a loan (buy a bond) and receive only 3% for a 5 year maturity. Our only exception to this is the Franklin Templeton Global Bond Fund or the TFranklin empleton Total Return Bond Fund. Both have done a brilliant job of buying good value bonds anywhere in the world as opportunities have appeared, as well as selecting the currency the bonds are purchased. We remain confident in management though appreciate their return in the next year is not likely to be as exceptional as they have been over the last year, where they have returned 12.50% in USD terms (remember, it is a bond fund!).


    Many of you are aware from past emails and personal communication that we have purchased a reasonable quantity (approx. 7 - 9% of portfolios) of structured products that assume equity risk but generate "equity like returns" as income so long as select equities don't fall more than a certain percentage below the strike price (we do not proceed without at least a 40% volatility/price drop barrier, a memory effect during the lifetime of the product to receive dividends in the future should the stock temporary fall below the barrier and at least 7% income per annum). We do this especially for companies we may like but have relatively low dividend yields. This product falls under alternatives in terms of asset allocation.


    From past emails we reiterate a belief that growth over the next few years will be weak, burdened by the large debt hidden in many corners of developed economies (consumers, governments, financials). The market over the last nine months had become too excited in pricing a recovery to "normal" times (in my personal opinion). In an environment where credit expansion will be weak this is an aggressive assumption.


    A possible scenario which can lead this conclusion to be flawed would occur if a fear of holding cash should arise due to inflationary problems. In this scenario, it is possible cash would chase physical assets such as commodities and stocks. This would lead real assets to appreciate and would show GDP figures as appreciating (of course all that is happening is each unit of currency is worth less). However, should that inflationary pressure become aggressive (i.e. inflation rates greater than 7%), stocks are unlikely to benefit for long and would fall as witnessed in the 1970s.


    As a result, we are looking to invest in commodities in the not too distant future. Pricing is starting to become more interesting.


    As always, we look forward to receive any questions you may have.


    Kind regards,

    Alex



    Disclosure: Only a single fund was explicitily mentioned. The author does not hold a position in this asset.
Back To Long Term Investment Management's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (1)
Track new comments
  • martinalphafishing
    , contributor
    Comments (2) | Send Message
     
    The templeton fund you mentioned has done very well.

     

    We have also invested in quality companies. Our definition is close to the one you have used. We think they are trading below the premium such companies usually trade at. Tobacco companies is something we are overweight on
    1 Jul 2010, 06:03 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers

StockTalks

  • Is it not concerning that bonds are pricing problems, equities a recovery whilst gold inflation?
    Jun 13, 2010
More »

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.