Daniel B. Ravicher's  Instablog

Daniel B. Ravicher
Send Message
Daniel B. Ravicher is a registered patent attorney who frequently consults with investment banks, hedge funds, and individual investors on legal issues that may materially affect the value of publicly traded companies. In addition to private consulting, Mr. Ravicher also regularly publishes... More
My company:
Daniel B. Ravicher, Esq.
My blog:
@danravicher on Twitter
  • Critical Update On Google Request To Postpone Vringo Ongoing Royalty Motion 3 comments
    Jan 23, 2013 9:08 PM | about stocks: FH, GOOG

    Today Seeking Alpha published my article, Google Request To Postpone Vringo Ongoing Royalty Motion Ignored, in which I said:

    ... if the Judge wanted to grant Google's motion to postpone consideration of Vringo's motion for post-judgment royalties, I strongly believe he would have already done so by now. The fact that he hasn't, signals to me that he won't.

    Within an hour or two after Seeking Alpha published my article, the Judge issued an order granting Google's postponement motion. In the Order, the Judge said:

    ... the Court's consideration of said motion shall be postponed until after the Court rules on the parties' post-trial motions currently pending before the Court under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50, 52, and 59. The Court will provide further guidance on the revised briefing schedule for Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties as necessary after the Court completes its consideration of the other relevant post-trial motions.

    Thus, obviously my conclusion from my article earlier today was wrong. I did say in my article that:

    Of course, he could grant Google's postponement request at any time .... . It's his court and he can do what he pleases when he pleases.

    But, there's no sugar coating it, I was wrong. Isn't the first time, and won't be the last time, either.

    Disclosure: I am long VRNG.

    Additional disclosure: As I disclose herein, I am long VRNG as of the publication of this instablog (VRNG is at 3.24) and my personal opinion at the moment as a result of the issues discussed herein is that it has a fair value of about 3.40-3.50. I'm not a financial advisor, and that is not a suggestion to any one to buy or sell VRNG. I merely state it because the Seeking Alpha editors have asked me to do so anytime I write about VRNG. VRNG is, in my opinion, highly volatile, as is the litigation process in which it is involved and, therefore, I may change my position in VRNG at any moment for any reason or no reason at all. Please see all my previous articles, including specifically those linked to herein, for additional disclosures.

    Stocks: FH, GOOG
Back To Daniel B. Ravicher's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • jlf75
    , contributor
    Comments (160) | Send Message
    O.K., now what. I am disappointed, but not disappointed enough to sell out. I think this is a travesty, but this kind of thing is not totally unexpected. That JJ he granted Goog's postponement motion makes me cynical, suspicious, and numb. No reason seems to be given, it's just granted. He could have done this three weeks ago.
    23 Jan 2013, 09:28 PM Reply Like
  • doc_hawkins
    , contributor
    Comments (194) | Send Message
    VRNG! Hello may I put you on hold please. LOL.


    It's just a bet.
    23 Jan 2013, 10:32 PM Reply Like
  • stockhawk
    , contributor
    Comments (272) | Send Message
    Thanks for the link, patience will prevail
    24 Jan 2013, 08:15 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.