AAPL (Apple Computer, Inc.) recently exhibited railroad tracks over a period of two weeks from February 27 - March 9, 2012. Many investors grew concerned that AAPL was potentially topping since it was technically overbought. Overbought/oversold indicators such as Bollinger Bands, RSI, and other indicators are used by some traders quite liberally.
Use of such indicators not only adds a considerable amount of additional noise to one's analysis, but is liable to scare one out of their position. The use of too many moving averages and overbought/oversold indicators could easily give one multiple excuses to sell prematurely. And since the market often climbs a wall of worry, the heavy dose of negative headline news further increase the odds that using such indicators will cause them to sell well before the stock has topped. Indeed, many of these indicators are short term oriented, so fail to see the long term trend in a stock or index.
Based on present technical action, the uptrend in AAPL is alive and well. Based on the rate of its present ascent, it should take about 6 to 8 weeks to get to 700, barring any setbacks in the general market, since most stocks correlate to some degree with the direction of the general market. That said, there may be a tiny number of top stocks that can buck a downtrend, so we run our screens throughout the day at www.selfishinvesting.com, apprising members of buy points in real-time, regardless of the action of the general market.
AAPL has had its technical setbacks which scared a number of investors out of the stock. On February 15, 2012, AAPL had a high volume downside reversal, after a huge move in prior weeks. Such action can occur around stocks that are topping. But while it is true that such high volume downside reversal patterns may be observed in a stocks that are topping, the converse which says that leading stocks that exhibit this pattern probably means a top, is often not true.
And market context always plays a role, which can throw an investor off track if they put too much emphasis on such labels. For example, a cup with handle basing pattern may look flawed but in actuality be a strong pattern when taken in context with the general market. SCHW (Charles Schwab Corp) exhibited such action from the basing pattern it formed from July - October 1998, so those investors who got caught up in labels figured the pattern was flawed thus failed to participate in SCHW's massive move in the ensuing months, when it rocketed from a split adjusted price of 9 to 51.67 in just 7 months.
Thus, there is no need to debate these technical labels, of which there are many (square box, 3 weeks tight, saucer, etc). And our 7-week rule can keep one in the big part of a stock's move. The rule is discussed here:
Once you have isolated the leading stocks which should comprise your watch list just as we do at selfishinvesting.com, just operate with pocket pivots [http://www.virtueofselfishinvesting.com/faqs/answer/Ten-Rules-for-Pocket-Pivots], buyable gap ups [http://www.virtueofselfishinvesting.com/faqs/answer/How-do-you-determine-if-a-stock-gapping-up-is-buyable-If-it-is-buyable-how-do-you-time-your-entry], standard breakouts, and the 7-week rule. It will keep you on track based on price/volume action alone while ignoring all the noise which comes in the form of negative headline news, the use of too many indicators, and the use of too many moving averages.
The presentations we have given at Money Show, Traders Expo, and other venues discuss in detail with many chart examples the concepts of pocket pivots, buyable gap ups, market context, market timing, and the 7-week rule. The handouts we shared at these events are available here: http://www.virtueofselfishinvesting.com/presentation-handouts
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.