Jason Nees'  Instablog

Jason Nees
Send Message
I have worked as a financial advisor at a couple of the wirehouses and managed money for corporate executives of publicly traded companies. I left the industry to help finance a small non-publicly traded consumer finance company. Now I spend my spare time analyzing companies and economic trends.... More
  • QE Calculator Misfires 0 comments
    Nov 18, 2010 10:32 AM | about stocks: DIA, QQQ, SPA


    In a NY Times article this morning, Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston was defending the Fed’s recent QE actions. In his view the $600bn QE program will decrease unemployment by .5% by the end of 2012. According to a quote attributed to him, “This would translate into 700,000 additional jobs…” Okay, sounds good. We need jobs.

    Hang on, let me get my napkin. This works out to $857,142.86 per job. Ouch that seems a bit spendy is these days of austerity. Let’s see what the numbers reveal. Assuming this policy creates all 700k jobs and the average income in the US is 42k that works out to $29.589bn in salaries annually of which $11.bn is discretionary dollars. That means, excluding the multiplier effects, these people need to keep their jobs for 20 years to recoup the $600bn.

    Now, before you go go batshit on me, I realize that this is a crude and rudimentary way to calulate the economic effects of this type of spending. The point of this little exercise is to find out where we would draw the imaginary line in a never-ending QE world. At what point do we dare to say; we have done all we can do.  Does that ever occur? 

    Mean-reversion is certainly painful, but an important keeper of a quasi free-market system. Maybe we’ve already had it and we are now in the new normal. I don’t know. I do know I will be placing my investment dollars on the opposite side of that trade.

    Disclosure: No positions mentioned
    Stocks: DIA, QQQ, SPA
Back To Jason Nees' Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (0)
Track new comments
Be the first to comment
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • When backing out PCE and Trade data the GDPM revision, due on the 26th, will likely be in the 1.0-1.2 range.
    Aug 19, 2010
More »
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.