Full index of posts »
StockTalks

Allocation Or Stock Selection  An Example http://seekingalpha.com/p/1xfy7 Sep 7, 2014

Simple GMR $EEM, $IJJ, $ILF http://seekingalpha.com/p/1uu8b Jul 31, 2014

Naive Graham: Taming Leveraged Funds http://seekingalpha.com/p/1sgbh Jun 20, 2014
Latest Comments
 yawkey5 on SemiAnnual Update Hi Varan,That chart was amazing! Growth has bee...
 varan on Simple GMR @AugustusThanks for the info.Although the retur...
 Augustus on Simple GMR varan,Do you have data that would let you test ...
 todd08 on A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds I think some of my notes are from the given lin...
 todd08 on A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds Woodshedder notes:Uses momentum measured by Rat...
 todd08 on A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds Anyone follow this? Woodshedder had commented o...
Most Commented
 Simple GMR ( Comments)
 A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds ( Comments)
 Naive Graham: Passive Investing According To The Master ( Comments)
 Winning Buffett's Bet ( Comments)
 Adaptive Asset Allocation For Lazy Portfolios ( Comments)
The Basic Portfolio 17 comments
This is a follow up to an earlier post. I have changed the basket a bit to minimize the number of ETFs that cannot be traded without commission at Fidelity. The performance of this basket is slightly better.
The strategy is derived from a synthesis of various ideas: relative strength and persistence of momentum, polygamous paired switching, and averaging over multiple time scales. The last one is just the antithesis of any strategy that optimizes with respect to the holding and evaluation periods. My view is that any such optimization would lead to a method that works very well in back testing but is quite fragile/brittle for the future. Averaging over multiple pairs of holding and evaluation periods provides the possibility of robustness with respect to future market movements whose time scales are generally unpredictable.
Although this strategy can be easily implemented without too many complex calculations, it seems to provide a very attractive method to adaptively change not only the weights of various components of the basket but also the number of ETFs that are invested in at any given time.
This quarterly rebalancing strategy works well to minimize portfolio volatility without any significant deleterious effect on the returns.
(a)at the beginning of every quarter choose a set of assets that performed the best during the immediately preceding month,
(b) at the beginning of every halfyear choose a set of assets that performed the best during the immediately preceding month, and
(c) at the beginning of every year choose a set of assets that performed the best during the immediately preceding quarter.
Obviously the assets from the three tranches can be commingled at the beginning of each quarter to be equally divided in the three tranches. Further the number of selected assets should be close to the number of equity ETFs in the basket (as in 1(a)).
Note that each of the three tranches specifies a set of weights for each of the components of the basket, with the weights for the first one changing every quarter, for the second one every sixmonths and for the third one only once a year. At the beginning of each quarter, these three sets of weights are averaged to construct the portfolio.
The basket consists of the following:
IJJ IJS EFA EEM IYR CEF AGG LQD TLT IEF EMB MBB
Apart from EFA, EEM, CEF, all these ETFs can be traded commission free at Fidelity. Commission free versions of EFA and EEM are available, but not much historical data exist for those ones, and so we have used EFA and EEM for back testing.
At each update for each tranch, five assets were chosen. However, since three different set of weights are averaged, the actual number of ETFs in the portfolio at any given time may range from five to fifteen. The following figure shows the number of ETFs that were in the portfolio during 20032013.
(click to enlarge)
Here are the detailed results for 2003:2013
CAGR 14.6%
Sharpe Ratio .99
Kelly Fraction .42
Maximum Monthly Drawdown 13.7%
Monthly One Factor Alpha .70%
Monthly One Factor Beta .48
Monthly One Factor R^2 .42
The equity curve, the Manhattan asset allocation diagram and the basic asset allocation diagram are shown below.
(click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge)
Disclosure: I am long IJS, LQD, CEF, AGG.
Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.
Share this Instablog with a colleague
How do you determine the weights of each fund are they equal, so if I had 4 funds would they be 25% each. If not how would I do it as I plan on doing it with mutual funds for 2016, please keep it simple I am no math wiz.
Thank You
Thanks