Dustin Moore's  Instablog

Dustin Moore
Send Message
Dustin Moore is a researcher and analyst focusing on overlooked and undervalued investments. He enjoys analyzing under-the-radar companies with massive upside potential and those with favorable risk/reward ratios. On Twitter! @dustinrmoore https://twitter.com/dustinrmoore
My blog:
My SA Instablog
  • An Overreaction To The Latest Apple Ploy 5 comments
    Aug 15, 2013 11:28 PM | about stocks: VHC, AAPL

    On August 15th, VirnetX (NYSEMKT:VHC) and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) again met in Tyler, Texas in front of a Federal Judge to discuss a fair and reasonable royalty rate for the use of VirnetX technology in Apple's VPN on Demand and FaceTime applications.

    Following the hearing, VirnetX shares plunged as low as $17, 17% off the closing price of $20.50. Although I did not attend the hearing, if the feedback I am getting is accurate and I understand correctly, nothing would merit the steep decline share price.

    The big headline emerging from the courtroom was that Apple developed a "workaround" to VirnetX's patents for FaceTime. This really should not be news. If we have learned anything, it is that Apple was not going to walk into the courtroom today with nothing. Further, Apple has always employed this non-infringing method by using relay servers, from what we learned in court last year, at least 5% of the time. Now we learn Apple is running 100% of FaceTime calls through relay servers, to implement its workaround.

    But the devil is in the details.

    VirnetX alleges that evidence shows this could cost Apple an extra $120M a year to continue. Further, Akamai (the company from which Apple leases the relay servers) expressed concern with current capacity, stating increased demand will require expansion of servers in 2014 and beyond.

    VirnetX also alleged such a workaround has degraded FaceTime user experience, citing a half million user complaints since the switch.

    From a subjective point-of-view, these problems make sense. Why wouldn't Apple have simply done this years ago to avoid litigation if it were indeed desirable and cost-effective?

    Apple's workaround actually demonstrates that VirnetX technology is superior and, importantly, valuable. Apple is playing a game, utilizing an expensive and more complex system, while possibly leaving users worse off. It certainly can afford to be stubborn, but it is costing them.

    Regardless, I would caution investors against an overreaction here. I would not lose sight of the fact that the judge has not ruled on anything yet. And nothing that occurred today would indicate he would support any royalty rate significantly lower than what VirnetX is proposing. In fact, evidence Avaya settlement and license. What happened in the courtroom today was lawyers simply being lawyers.

    Even if the FaceTime workaround is successful, this does not affect the $368M verdict, nor the post-verdict damages, nor the enhanced damages & rate for willful post-verdict use, nor the royalty for use at least until April (even Apple suggests up to .5% could be fair). This also has no bearing on VirnetX's ability to secure royalties on the implementation of future LTE networks. Apple is at best implementing an inferior system to secure and initiate Facetime calls. At worse it is engaging in a ploy to maneuver the justice system.

    VirnetX also appears to have asked the court to issue a royalty rate at least up until the alleged workaround began. Arguments about whether these workarounds are "colorably different" could be dealt with separately later. This could be significant if the Judge agrees to that process. Any ruling of a royalty rate will by key in further bolstering VirnetX's licensing agenda, not only for Apple, but for non-litigants on the sidelines…

    Disclosure: I am long VHC.

    Stocks: VHC, AAPL
Back To Dustin Moore's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (5)
Track new comments
  • Tom Shaughnessy
    , contributor
    Comments (1145) | Send Message
    Great write up Dustin, My long winded original comment is lost but Very accurate information and an astute take on what went on.
    15 Aug 2013, 11:37 PM Reply Like
  • Dustin Moore
    , contributor
    Comments (277) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » VPNonDemand appears to be fully in play, at least I did not hear anything about a "colorably different" workaround...however I'm getting conflicting reports on that. If anyone has any details on that, it would be appreciated.
    15 Aug 2013, 11:39 PM Reply Like
  • Dustin Moore
    , contributor
    Comments (277) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I've long thought the RR decision was several weeks away, at the soonest. But I actually think Apple's maneuvering may speed up the royalty rate decision by the Judge, in part. The ruling may be broken up now, with the royalty rate decision based on Apple's use up to Spring 2013 decided first; meanwhile kicking judgement of "colorably different" down the road.
    17 Aug 2013, 06:16 PM Reply Like
  • Chinabob
    , contributor
    Comments (36) | Send Message
    Good recap of the August 15th hearing and the smoke screen that Apple is trying to put over on the court. Judge Davis is very astute and will see though this. It's had to understand how Apple would take a route that degraded their quality of service while making their communications less secure. It was reported at the hearing that Apple has received over 500,000 complaints since April 5th when they instituted this terrible attempt at a work around.
    17 Aug 2013, 08:17 PM Reply Like
  • Dustin Moore
    , contributor
    Comments (277) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I agree. Davis is quite wise in hindsight. He spun off the ongoing royalty issue specifically to get VirnetX justice for past infringement, while he can now take his time to deal with the complexities he clearly knew would be coming..
    17 Aug 2013, 11:58 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • $GOMO started day down only a bit. Now off -7.9%
    Oct 20, 2014
  • Kudos to the investor who snagged $MARA shares sub $13.
    Oct 9, 2014
  • 21Vianet Exposer's Bogus Exhibits $VNET http://seekingalpha.com/a/1hf2z
    Sep 13, 2014
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.