Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

Some Stock Analysts Make Monster Missteps

Aug. 15, 2014 5:52 PM ETMNST, KO
Snefsky profile picture
Snefsky's Blog
11 Followers
Please Note: Blog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors.

About a month ago, Morgan Stanley and UBS downgraded Monster Beverage (MNST) stock, sending its shares on a tailspin. But, last night, Coca-Cola (KO) announced a 16.7% stake in Monster at a cost of $2.15B in cash. Announcement of the purchase sent Monster shares through the roof, up about 28% in extended hours trading. In short, the analysts making these downgrades totally blew it, and Coke new it. So, what's the take-a-way here?

Many amateur investors place a tremendous amount of trust on analyst ratings, blindly following recommendations on the headline of an upgrade or downgrade from a company that the investor "perceives" as being an authoritative source. But, don't be fooled. Analysts at seemingly respectable companies get it wrong all the time for a variety of reasons, each of which could take its own full blog post to explain.

Do I pay attention to analyst ratings and research reports in my own investing endeavors? Sure. I take note of them. But, I don't act on them. I take note of the overall trend of ratings for a given stock. I'm more interested in a rating given by an analyst with a strong track record, compared to those who are average. I take note of the overall field of analysts covering a stock to see if the ratings are strongly weighted in one direction or another. If all the analysts covering a stock already rate the thing a "strong buy", is there really much more room on the upside?

More so than the ratings themselves, I am interested in the research reports that hopefully come with the ratings. But, even these I take with a monster grain of salt. I use these largely as a way to double check that I didn't miss anything in my own research. And, even if I see a new thought in a research report, I always ask myself if I agree. I read this stuff with an extremely critical mind, rather than taking the words as truth.

I never lose track of the fact that, often, there is a highly paid, highly educated analyst telling me to buy something, while somewhere out there, one of his/her former classmates is telling me to sell. I'll hear both of them out and see where I agree and where I do not. Their words, after all, are referred to as "analyst opinions", not "analyst truths".

Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Additional disclosure: This post was originally published on the author's personal blog.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You