Thomsett's  Instablog

Send Message
Michael C. Thomsett is a widely published options author. His "Getting Started in Options" (Wiley, 9th edition) has sold over 300,000 copies. He also is author of "Options Trading for the Conservative Investor" and "The Options Trading Body of Knowledge" (both FT Press); and "Options for... More
My company:
Michael C. Thomsett, author
My blog:
Thomsett Options
My book:
Getting Started in Stock Investing and Trading
  • Collars: Protective Option Strategies Worth Consideration 3 comments
    May 8, 2012 11:54 AM | about stocks: MMM, COST

    The problem for anyone in the market is the threat of loss. Owning stock means you risk a decline in the price, and this is where some specific options-based protective strategies are exceptionally valuable. One such strategy is the collar.

    The collar has three parts: 100 shares of stock, a short call, and a long put. If the stock price rises, the call is exercised and the stock is called away. As long as the strike is higher than your basis in the stock, your profit comes from the option premium plus capital gains on the stock. However, exercise can also be avoided by closing the call or rolling it forward.

    If the stock price declines, the short call will expire worthless or can be closed at a profit. The long put will grow in value point for point with decline in the stock once the put is in the money. This strategy limits profit while putting a ceiling on losses. So while it is not going to create large profits, it does protect you.

    The collar often is entered in stages, not all at once. For example, your stock rises and you sell a covered call. However, the stock then begins to decline. Rather than close the call and sell the stock, you open a long put to protect against the decline, should it continue.

    The strikes of the typical collar are both out of the money. For example, 3M (NYSE: MMM) was worth $89.26 on April 30, 2012. At that point in the trading day, you could create a collar with a June 90 call (sold for 1.25) and a June 87.50 put (costing you 1.57). The net cost of this collar is $22 plus trading fees. So for under $40 overall, you build in downside protection; and as long as you bought 1200 shares of the stock for under $87.50 (the put's strike), exercise of the call creates a net capital gain.

    If your concern is that 3M could slide downward, the collar is a sensible strategy that also helps you avoid selling, if that is the only alternative. This is an example of how options can be used to manage your portfolio, reduce risk, and minimize the cost of the strategy itself. In this example, the pre-trading fee cost is only $22.

    Another example, one somewhat more expensive for a stock priced in the same range, is that of Costco (NASDAQ: COST). It was worth $88.32 on April 30. A collar could be created with a July 90 call, which yields you 1.73; and a July 87.50 put, which costs you 2.36. So your pre-trading fee cost for the collar is $63.

    This is not bad considering that you get downside protection below $87.50. Here again, you might have purchased stock at a lower price and sold a covered call, and now want to protect against the possibility of a price decline. Transforming a covered call into a collar makes sense in this situation.

    All option strategies rely on timing. Implied volatility rises and falls and you will get maximum premium for the short call when IV is exceptionally high. So in addition to identifying risk-management strategies for stock in your portfolio, you also will benefit from tracking IV on the stocks you own, as part of your options strategy.

    A volatility-based strategy can be complex without help, but it can be simple and easy with the right tracking tools. To improve your option trade timing, check Options & Volatility Edge which is designed to help you improve selection of options as well as timing of your trades.

    Stocks: MMM, COST
Back To Thomsett's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (3)
Track new comments
  • Mitch777
    , contributor
    Comments (8) | Send Message
    Yes. I really like the idea of a collar. As a retiree I want to own high dividend low beta stocks and colkar them. Using some of the dividends to totally pay for the colkar premiums. My question is should I use long dated LEAPS for the collars or shorter dated expirations. It seems to me that if lets say I want to collar NLY paying a 10% div and I want to own it for as long as possible just to milk the dividend, why not buy the longest dated expiration option available for the NLY. Does this make sense or am I overlooking something?
    13 Jun 2012, 03:15 PM Reply Like
  • Thomsett
    , contributor
    Comments (106) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » No, you are right. If the goal is to maximize dividend income, the collar eliminates downside market risk while exposing you to upside exercise, also at a profit. Go for the highest possible dividend yields on this and I think you do well. - Michael
    14 Jun 2012, 08:47 AM Reply Like
  • Thomsett
    , contributor
    Comments (106) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » check for more info
    16 Jun 2012, 06:54 PM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.