Arthur_Big's  Instablog

Send Message
An investigative consultant / journalist with extensive experience in forensic investigation focusing on financial fraud. Has uncovered high profile fraud cases against companies and individuals throughout Europe, Canada and Asian Pacific Region. For dislcosure, I am using the alias Arthur Big... More
  • Letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), FINRA and other Regulatory Authorities 12 comments
    May 10, 2011 12:57 PM | about stocks: PUDA, GURE, DEER, ABAT, YONG, ZSTN, LFT, ONP, MOBI

    We believe that the practices of these “hit piece research” firms have significantly damaged the integrity of the public markets, the effectiveness of the SEC and FINRA, and have ignored the laws and regulations that a public company must follow and the standards and ethics that an individual acting as a “research” analyst must adhere to.  We have followed the actions of such individuals and companies (Geoinvesting, Alfred Little, OLP Global, Citron Research, John Hempton, and many more) and have seen a continual and significant degradation of the effectiveness of the regulations that are meant to govern and orderly and fair public marketplace.  To that end, we will take the time to briefly compare the actions that are taking place and why we believe it’s illegal, of low integrity and very damning to the integrity of the US public markets. 

    Bona fide research analysts are held to certain standards and requirements that are monitored by FINRA, SEC and various other regulatory authorities for a reason.  Ultimately, they are an individual that performs significant research on companies, their environment, their filings, etc. They have to speak to management teams, determine the integrity of their statements, potentially dig deeper to discover the truth, and then translate all their due diligence data points and information into a report that is disseminated through public means. 

    On the other hand, recently another type of “research” has surfaced that has been coined (even by the authors themselves) as a “Hit Piece”.  This type of “research” report has garnered this name because the author has intent of “hitting” (or substantially decreasing) the share price of the company with their report.  What is the difference, one may ask, of a “hit piece” author and a research analyst?


    Discussion Topic

    Research Analyst

    Hit Piece Author

    Interaction with company management to understand the business model.

    Speaks to management to understand the full details of the business.  Interacts with all levels of the company and its service providers, customers, and stakeholders of the company to understand their business model and follows-up with management or the appropriate person to get their questions answered, if needed.    They can believe or question such statements, but they certainly run their questions through the company prior to forming their opinion on the company via their report.

    Does not make an attempt to speak to management, either initially, or as follow-up. Many of these authors have actually stated publicly they prefer not to speak to management prior to releasing their reports.  While initially this may seem unusual, this is very consistent with the purpose of a “hit piece”,  as it would typically lessen their ability to publish negative statements and potentially lessen the damage to a company’s share price if management clarified their questions in a conversation exchange prior to the “hit piece” release.




    Ability to trade on inside information.

    Research analysts are restricted from trading in such securities prior to releasing the report and still post releasing the report.  Not only are they restricted, but the entire research department and employees of their firm are restricted as well.

    Hit piece authors aggressively short sell securities or buy substantial quantities of puts immediately prior to putting out their reports.  Furthermore they typically sell such reports to their colleagues and enable them to front run such reports prior as well.  Only after they have their short positions or puts does the author post their reports with the sole intent of manipulating the share price.  In addition to this manipulative report, they further create the illusion of share price collapse through trading programs that aggressively overstate downward volume.  All of this is to create fear and selling in the share price, enabling them and their colleagues to immediately cover their shorts or sell or cover their puts. 




    Access to non-public information and means of obtaining such information.

    Research analysts are restricted to public information and are not able to utilize unscrupulous methods (such as bribes) to obtain information that deemed privileged and not public to the investing public.

    Hit piece authors will commonly use corrupt methods and lie to companies or bribe and lie to other providers of information (such as clerks at local tax offices, government officials, etc.) to obtain any information they can to either prove their point or further enable them to manipulate the stock price of the security that they referencing.





    If a research analyst uncovered what they believe to be fraudulent activities within a company, they are required to immediately report such activities to the company for clarification, their compliance department, and/or the authorities to ensure that investors do not get harmed more than they should, and so that the authorities can take the necessary actions to ensure that the losses and damages incurred by the investing public is minimized.

    If a “hit piece” author uncovers what they believe to be fraud, or even something that is minimally unclear to them (without requesting clarification from the company), they immediately utilize such information to trade on the security, draft a report, internally share their findings for a fee to their colleagues, then disseminate such report in the most extremes of damning manners that one can imagine, use trading techniques to increase volume and drive down the stock price to a maximum point and cover their trades to lock in their profits, while causing immeasurable harm to the investing public in the process. 


    We believe based on the points above that these authors are not “research analysts”, but individuals that are that are getting away with crimes that are egregious, disturbing and increasingly damaging to the investing public.  The most disturbing thing of all is that they are doing it in broad daylight, right in front of the authorities as almost a sign of defiance, and claim that they are invincible to, or above, the law. 

    Some may argue that they should be viewed as “journalists” versus a research analyst and should not be regulated; despite the fact they claim they are a research analyst themselves.  If this is the case then this still does not preclude these authors from abiding by the laws and regulations established by the SEC and FINRA.  If they want to use “yellow journalism” to profit at the expense of the investing public than we believe that is still just damaging to the average public and should be monitored, regulated and controlled.

    We PLEAD that the actions of these individuals and companies are monitored, investigated and tracked and that all means are used to ensure that they are acting in accordance with the laws and regulations that were established to protect ALL investors, large and small.  If these actions are not stopped we believe that millions of dollars will be taken from the pockets of hard working Americans, and global investors, that have put the faith and trust in US securities regulations to monitor and stop such unscrupulous actions. 

Back To Arthur_Big's Instablog HomePage »

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.

Comments (12)
Track new comments
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » Was speaking to a colleague. How do you get maximum upside in a stock while taking very little risk.


    His answer was your short a stock and immediately release a hit piece. Cover your short and immediately go long the stock, betting that the suckers that read your hit will be shorting the stock.


    When the suckers have to cover on the upside you maximized your long profit.


    The only factor he forgot was the risk of jail time.
    12 May 2011, 01:18 PM Reply Like
  • zorrba
    , contributor
    Comments (428) | Send Message
    The difference between a *research analyst* covered by non disclosure rules and anyone else doing research and telling the world of their findings while apparently not covered by non disclosure is?
    18 May 2011, 03:06 PM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » A regulated research analyst, that has to have certain credentials is monitored by the law and required to obey certain laws and regulations.


    An actual research analyst can't trade on his report prior to releasing it or sell it to someone prior to releasing it.


    A regulated research analyst would atleast question the management prior to releasing it. In YONG's latest hit piece there were statements of interpretation that were just flat wrong and if he would have spoken to anyone versus spinning it in their way they would have been clarified - similar to GFRE and ONP.


    A regulated research analyst is required to try to tell the truth, these crooks and criminals don't care about the truth, so long as they can move the market in the direction of their choosing.
    19 May 2011, 07:58 AM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I disagree with your thoughts. I am doing this 100% for free. Would open up my brokerage account to anyone (as the only account i have is my IRA from a past employee which is all large cap stocks and bonds).


    If someone uncovers fraud you are not allowed to trade on it prior to disclosing. Its illegal.


    Are you trying to tell me that two wrongs make a right? What legal counsel ever used that for their client on the stand?
    25 May 2011, 11:00 AM Reply Like
  • iluvdividend
    , contributor
    Comments (5) | Send Message
    Are you not tempted to go in long when a RTO stock, that has had a hit piece from Alfred Little, bottoms?
    3 Jun 2011, 06:24 PM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » No, i don't invest in any of these companies or this space. I know nothing about any of these companies and I am market analyst not an investor. My IRA is invested in only very large companies, bonds and mutual funds.
    4 Jun 2011, 09:34 AM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I stand by my statement - be patient. They are watching.


    No i did not write a fake release though as I would be operating at your level.
    21 Jun 2011, 06:28 PM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I was able to point out something is coming, because it is. As far as I am aware nothing has come out yet against hit piece authors from the law. Just wait though. coming soon in my opinion based on my research and conversations.
    21 Jun 2011, 09:33 PM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » Just wait, its coming.
    22 Jun 2011, 06:02 AM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » Home depot is a great job. Are you insinuating differently?
    22 Jun 2011, 06:09 AM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I can see how you got the gig as a "contributor" on here. Very value added content.


    Don't be nervous, bubba will be nice to you....
    22 Jun 2011, 07:58 AM Reply Like
  • Arthur_Big
    , contributor
    Comments (174) | Send Message
    Author’s reply » I have said wait for the real deal my friend. Not much longer.


    Chris Wu claims he brought down RINO?


    Chris Wu:
    Oh btw, authorities are indeed interested in listening, just like how they reached me for more details on RINO fraud. I'm sure someone will be very interested in your "coincidence" about yesterday's fraud.


    Arthur_Big June 22 at 7:52am
    oh you are the one that uncovered rino?


    Chris Wu June 22 at 10:14am
    Oh you are the one that orchestrated the fraud behind that one? Get some clue, many people have long figured RINO was a fraud before it was exposed to the public.


    So when I first told RINO fraudster their schemes are close to an end because I intend to release my findings about the fraud, they told me exactly what you said - wait, the authorities like SEC will come get you. So now it's been a year, SEC has asked nothing but evidences on how RINO defrauded the investors. Pretty funny huh?


    So how about we talk about your hiding behind the alias to engage in manipulation?
    22 Jun 2011, 10:21 AM Reply Like
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


  • Does anyone have an opinion on timing of hit pieces? I have been following a new trend and believe they are very interesting given timing.
    Jun 8, 2011
More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.