My Mission is to provide individuals and small business owners with superior financial education tools, resources and news enabling users to make informed and rational decisions. visit my blog at http://www.networthprotect.com

A few weeks ago I created a Model InvestmentPortfolio and I have been tracking it ever since. This past week the portfolio generated a total return of 7.77%, outpacing S&P 500 Index weekly returns of 5.98%. Since its inception on 9/23/11 the NWP portfolio has provided a return of 8.82% and the S&P 500 Index provided a return of 7.76% over the same period.

Thus far the use of levered-ETF to magnify exposures to U.S. large cap and emerging market equities has provided the boost in returns I was hoping to receive. However, the downside to this approach is increased volatility. The model portfolio has an annualized volatility of returns of 33.7% while the S&P 500 has been less volatile at 23.3%.

Given the wide disparity in volatility I need to find a way to compare “apples to apples”. In other words, How do I determine if I am being paid enough in terms of returns to compensation me for the extra risk? (Assuming we view volatility as an adequate measure of risk)

This week I am focusing on one metric (there are many others) known as the Sharpe Ratio to help me compare my portfolio performance to indices. The Sharpe Ratio is a relatively simple way to measure risk-adjusted returns. Here is the formula:

Sharpe = (Portfolio Return – Risk free return) / Standard deviation of returns.

I used the 10-year U.S. treasury rate as a proxy for the risk free rate of return, which is currently at a rate of 1.93%.

At this point , my portfolio is underperforming on a relative basis because the model portfolio has a lower Sharpe Ratio of 1.07 vs. The S&P 500 ratio of 1.36. BUT, I am still happy with the portfolio performance for three main reasons 1) I applied moderate leverage in the portfolio expecting outsized risk, so I am not that surprised. 2) My portfolio is not meant to be perfectable comprable to the S&P 500. For example, the S&P 500 does not have any fixed income or commidities holdings, whereas my portfolio has significant positions in these asset classes. 3) The model portfolio has only been live for 3 weeks; give it a chance man!.

Here is the portfolio as it stands today (10/14/11). I will likely liquidate the leveraged ETFs if the S&P 500 reach 1,275 before year end. At that point I would expect another correction so I plan to hold the cash proceeds and will buy in again at $1,180.

Instablogs are blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha
community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors,
in contrast to contributors' articles.

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.

## Model ETF Portfolio using ETFs and incorporating Levered-ETFs: My Trading Portfolio. 0 comments

A few weeks ago I created a Model Investment Portfolio and I have been tracking it ever since. This past week the portfolio generated a total return of 7.77%, outpacing S&P 500 Index weekly returns of 5.98%. Since its inception on 9/23/11 the NWP portfolio has provided a return of 8.82% and the S&P 500 Index provided a return of 7.76% over the same period.

Thus far the use of levered-ETF to magnify exposures to U.S. large cap and emerging market equities has provided the boost in returns I was hoping to receive. However, the downside to this approach is increased volatility. The model portfolio has an annualized volatility of returns of 33.7% while the S&P 500 has been less volatile at 23.3%.

Given the wide disparity in volatility I need to find a way to compare “apples to apples”. In other words, How do I determine if I am being paid enough in terms of returns to compensation me for the extra risk? (Assuming we view volatility as an adequate measure of risk)

This week I am focusing on one metric (there are many others) known as the Sharpe Ratio to help me compare my portfolio performance to indices. The Sharpe Ratio is a relatively simple way to measure risk-adjusted returns. Here is the formula:

Sharpe=(Portfolio Return – Risk free return) / Standard deviation of returns.I used the 10-year U.S. treasury rate as a proxy for the risk free rate of return, which is currently at a rate of 1.93%.

At this point , my portfolio is underperforming on a relative basis because the model portfolio has a lower Sharpe Ratio of 1.07 vs. The S&P 500 ratio of 1.36. BUT, I am still happy with the portfolio performance for three main reasons 1) I applied moderate leverage in the portfolio expecting outsized risk, so I am not that surprised. 2) My portfolio is not meant to be perfectable comprable to the S&P 500. For example, the S&P 500 does not have any fixed income or commidities holdings, whereas my portfolio has significant positions in these asset classes. 3) The model portfolio has only been live for 3 weeks; give it a chance man!.

Here is the portfolio as it stands today (10/14/11). I will likely liquidate the leveraged ETFs if the S&P 500 reach 1,275 before year end. At that point I would expect another correction so I plan to hold the cash proceeds and will buy in again at $1,180.

Instablogsare blogs which are instantly set up and networked within the Seeking Alpha community. Instablog posts are not selected, edited or screened by Seeking Alpha editors, in contrast to contributors' articles.## Share this Instablog with a colleague

Comments(0)