Celsion (CLSN) issues a statement in response to yesterday's Seeking Alpha blog, calling it...

Celsion (CLSN) issues a statement in response to yesterday's Seeking Alpha blog, calling it misleading and requiring clarification. The company says it's conducted extensive post hoc analysis of the data from the ThermoDox studies with its key experts, and found that its use in conjunction with RFA to treat hepatocellular carcinoma suggests it markedly improves survival if the lesions undergo RFA for 45 minutes or more. While the study hasn't yet reached its median survival endpoint, the data shows a strong signal which its experts consider to be encouraging enough to warrant further clinical investigation.

Comments (8)
  • Chris Hofmann
    , contributor
    Comments (756) | Send Message
    And yet, Seeking Alpha refuses to remove Alpha Exposure's purposefully misleading article ('anonymous sources' contrasting CLSN's statements).


    The fact that Seeking Alpha allows this sort of blatant manipulation to occur is mind boggling.
    12 Jun 2013, 04:19 PM Reply Like
  • stg55
    , contributor
    Comments (8) | Send Message
    Someone will be sued before this is all over with.
    12 Jun 2013, 04:22 PM Reply Like
  • Brandond
    , contributor
    Comments (473) | Send Message
    For the life of me, I have no idea how the SEC is not parked in SA's offices. These transparent, manipulative articles, often published by nameless, one person "research houses", happen all the time. The exact same thing happened with BDBD and EBIX. Both cratered by panic selling and rebounded nicely but not before the little guy got the shaft.
    12 Jun 2013, 04:27 PM Reply Like
  • Chris Hofmann
    , contributor
    Comments (756) | Send Message
    The exact same thing is currently happening with UNXL, thanks in large part to Alpha Exposure himself (aka 'Seth Shaw').


    Exact same M.O. as well - distort truths, anonymous experts, etc.
    12 Jun 2013, 04:30 PM Reply Like
  • Quoth the Raven
    , contributor
    Comments (2063) | Send Message
    Alpha Exposure's article was way off base with tons of non-facts. I tried to address them all in my article this morning:
    12 Jun 2013, 05:22 PM Reply Like
  • sheldond
    , contributor
    Comments (1357) | Send Message
    You did that.
    12 Jun 2013, 07:40 PM Reply Like
  • XBurd
    , contributor
    Comments (4) | Send Message
    I'm pleased that the company management issued a statement this afternoon to confront the SA article published by Alpha Exposure on the ThermoDox HEAT studies.
    12 Jun 2013, 05:55 PM Reply Like
    , contributor
    Comment (1) | Send Message
    It would be so nice if I could just make things up, say they are facts then go short on the stock i just bashed. How they get away with it is beyond me! hey "Seth Shaw" the next time you write a bitter article let some of us in on it so we can profit like you do. The FCC is clearly not concerned so the next time you decide to make up a story hook us up.
    13 Jun 2013, 09:15 AM Reply Like
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)
ETF Screener: Search and filter by asset class, strategy, theme, performance, yield, and much more
ETF Performance: View ETF performance across key asset classes and investing themes
ETF Investing Guide: Learn how to build and manage a well-diversified, low cost ETF portfolio
ETF Selector: An explanation of how to select and use ETFs