Top European court: People have "right to be forgotten" on Internet

The European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that Google (GOOG) can be ordered to delete sensitive information, under certain conditions, from its Internet search results if it is requested to do so.

Google had argued that forcing it to remove data amounted to censorship, although privacy advocates believe that people should be able to delete their digital traces.

The issue arose after a Spanish man complained that his privacy was infringed when an auction notice of his repossessed home appeared on search results.

Other relevant tickers: YHOO, MSFT, YNDX, BIDU

From other sites
Comments (4)
  • Aldo Mysek
    , contributor
    Comment (1) | Send Message
    I think that when you pay for something as in internet service, you own the paid for e-mail & searches & should retain the right to keep it or delete it just like regular mail. I can shred it (snail mail) or any other thing I choose to do as the end recipient. There are already laws & structures in place regulating copyrights & intellectual properties. With respect to e-mails & all searches enacted by an individual subscriber, ISPs should not sell or share that info without one's approval. At the end of such subscriptions, if the subscriber doesn't want his dossier, it should be deleted. That would be the best case scenario with respect to individual subscriber rights.
    13 May 2014, 09:10 AM Reply Like
  • duhaus
    , contributor
    Comments (320) | Send Message
    Censorship ?!? Hahaha !! You might want to look up the definition of that one boys.
    13 May 2014, 09:53 AM Reply Like
  • Seppo Sahrakorpi
    , contributor
    Comments (2146) | Send Message
    Dangerous precedent. Search results should be neutral. If there is problem w/ something being public, one should go after the original source.


    Of course Google itself already taints and skews the search results to please the end-user, so this is a moot point already.
    13 May 2014, 10:28 AM Reply Like
  • Seppo Sahrakorpi
    , contributor
    Comments (2146) | Send Message
    Good read in Guardian:


    She gets it:


    "... Carr, acting director of the privacy rights campaign Big Brother Watch, said: "The principle that you have a right to be forgotten is a laudable one, but it was never intended to be a way for people to rewrite history. Search engines do not host information and trying to get them to censor legal content from their results is the wrong approach. Information should be tackled at source, which in this case is a Spanish newspaper, otherwise we start getting into very dangerous territory....

    13 May 2014, 12:16 PM Reply Like
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)
ETF Screener: Search and filter by asset class, strategy, theme, performance, yield, and much more
ETF Performance: View ETF performance across key asset classes and investing themes
ETF Investing Guide: Learn how to build and manage a well-diversified, low cost ETF portfolio
ETF Selector: An explanation of how to select and use ETFs