"Almost a 51st state, but with a much better currency and a much more prudent government and...

"Almost a 51st state, but with a much better currency and a much more prudent government and central bank," says David Rosenberg on growing client interest in investing in Canada. Rosenberg sees a series of rate hikes by the BoC while the Fed remains on hold - giving the country and the loonie an even greater yield advantage.

From other sites
Comments (6)
  • The Last Boomer
    , contributor
    Comments (1049) | Send Message
    Canada is different from US in many ways but two are quite important for the fiscal and financial health of the country:
    - their banks are regulated more tightly than ours
    - they have government-run healthcare that keeps the overall healthcare costs down and these costs are the major contributor to our future deficits in the US.
    23 Apr 2012, 12:35 PM Reply Like
  • Losing Paper While Gaining ...
    , contributor
    Comments (488) | Send Message
    Those are minor differences.


    The Major differences are:
    - Canada doesn't have such a bloated defense expenditure
    - Canada doesn't have reserve currency status, which means it can't have such a terrible trade and budget deficit


    These are the things that will bankrupt the US in the long run. The banks facilitate the problem and healthcare is just something people will look back on in a few years as the issue politicians used to distract people from the real problems.
    23 Apr 2012, 12:46 PM Reply Like
  • davidingeorgia
    , contributor
    Comments (2661) | Send Message
    Wouldn't that be the 58th state? Our geographically impaired president told us there are already 57, so it must be true.
    23 Apr 2012, 12:35 PM Reply Like
  • Uncle Pie
    , contributor
    Comments (4322) | Send Message
    thank God Canada is not the 51st state! (or the 58th)


    long many Canadian equities for a long time!
    23 Apr 2012, 01:15 PM Reply Like
  • bob adamson
    , contributor
    Comments (4560) | Send Message
    Canada will continue to do fine in the middle to long term but I question David Rosenberg's advice timing. Canada is currently suffering significant regional imbalances in economic development which breed an uptick in inter-regional political tensions. Ontario and Quebec, which form Canada's industrial and population heartland, are experiencing lagging economic growth which is causing their Provincial governments major fiscal problems. This is a classic case of 'Dutch Disease' (i.e. a booming resource sector retarding the economic progress of other segments of the economy by causing economic bottlenecks and excessive currency exchange rate appreciation).


    Even the resource boom is under pressure as Asian markets for commodities softens.


    Domestic housing and consumer debt markets are arguably excessively high but the Bank of Canada is reluctant to raise interest rates to slow these rises because of the issues earlier described.


    This is not to suggest that serious trouble will ensue; only that the Canadian Dollar is unlikely to appreciate further over the next year or so and that Canadian equity markets are likely to trade within a narrow range for the next year or so.
    23 Apr 2012, 03:16 PM Reply Like
  • anonymous#12
    , contributor
    Comments (545) | Send Message
    Everyone I know says the best place to invest is Canada. I don't see anyone bearish on Canada. I only see research papers indicating that Canada has the perfect economy.


    Meanwhile housing prices continue to outperform wage and income growth by huge leaps.....
    23 Apr 2012, 05:52 PM Reply Like
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)
ETF Screener: Search and filter by asset class, strategy, theme, performance, yield, and much more
ETF Performance: View ETF performance across key asset classes and investing themes
ETF Investing Guide: Learn how to build and manage a well-diversified, low cost ETF portfolio
ETF Selector: An explanation of how to select and use ETFs