Seeking Alpha

Initial Jobless Claims: +4K to 371K vs. 362K consensus, 367K prior (revised). Continuing claims...

Initial Jobless Claims: +4K to 371K vs. 362K consensus, 367K prior (revised). Continuing claims -127K to 3.10M.
Comments (11)
  • BruceInKY
    , contributor
    Comments (429) | Send Message
     
    Cue the BTO..."B-B-B-Baby, you just ain't seen n-n-n-nothin' yet"...and march Forward!
    10 Jan 2013, 08:56 AM Reply Like
  • mickmars
    , contributor
    Comments (1323) | Send Message
     
    This recovery is like kissing your sister.
    10 Jan 2013, 08:59 AM Reply Like
  • Petrarch
    , contributor
    Comments (730) | Send Message
     
    You make a habit of that?
    Just wondering
    P
    10 Jan 2013, 12:55 PM Reply Like
  • GaltMachine
    , contributor
    Comments (1140) | Send Message
     
    This was the blurb describing the news from the CNBC website:

     

    "Weekly applications for U.S. unemployment benefits ticked up slightly last week, the latest sign of stability in the job market."

     

    That seems so Orwellian to me - an increase in the unemployed is a sign of strength!

     

    Anyway as they say it could have been a lot worse.
    10 Jan 2013, 09:00 AM Reply Like
  • Petrarch
    , contributor
    Comments (730) | Send Message
     
    this was a decent number.
    where is Lakshman? where is the recession?
    P
    10 Jan 2013, 12:54 PM Reply Like
  • bbro
    , contributor
    Comments (9621) | Send Message
     
    No recession folks...seasonal factor next week is a doozy...1.66..you have been
    forewarned...
    10 Jan 2013, 09:04 AM Reply Like
  • mickmars
    , contributor
    Comments (1323) | Send Message
     
    Don't bet against the Fed. They are now all in.
    11 Jan 2013, 09:29 AM Reply Like
  • anonymous#12
    , contributor
    Comments (552) | Send Message
     
    So where's the recession the doomers have been calling for...3 straight years now?

     

    I remember a guy here on SA that around August of 2010 said: "things are collapsing, you would see", "the S&P 500 going back to 600 soon"....hahahahahaha....
    10 Jan 2013, 09:50 AM Reply Like
  • schatzl
    , contributor
    Comments (391) | Send Message
     
    Yes, because a stock exchange awash in liquidity and turbocharged by ZIRP is an accurate reflection of US fundamentals.
    10 Jan 2013, 11:30 AM Reply Like
  • SoCalNative
    , contributor
    Comments (472) | Send Message
     
    Anon,
    Kinda antagonistic isn't it? What's your call?
    10 Jan 2013, 11:33 AM Reply Like
  • june1234
    , contributor
    Comments (2590) | Send Message
     
    Someone's getting fired for printing a non recovering headline number like that. Last weeks number was revised downward, now that's a rarity; someone else is probably getting fired for that one too, you're supposed to make it look good when it first comes out not after.
    10 Jan 2013, 10:37 AM Reply Like
DJIA (DIA) S&P 500 (SPY)
ETF Tools
Find the right ETFs for your portfolio:
Seeking Alpha's new ETF Hub
ETF Investment Guide:
Table of Contents | One Page Summary
Read about different ETF Asset Classes:
ETF Selector

Next headline on your portfolio:

|