. . . and to keep the Administration's agenda from being understood by the people. When it is exposed, and I believe it will be, the newspapers will finally be finished.
On May 05 12:59 PM davidingeorgia wrote: > of course they're going to get bailed out after working so hard to > get this administration elected...it's as sure a bet as exists anywhere > these days.
I think if newspapers get a bailout, that will signal an end to the Obama administration. No way will the taxpayers allow this. Not only that, but it will truly end the 1st ammendment and rid any possibility of unbiased reporting.
William Cowie is the CEO of private company servicing the hospitality industry. He is a private investor.
Our (liberal) neighbors next door are already working on it. Their argument: every city "needs" a taxpayer supported newspaper like they "need" a ballet, art, orchestra and blah blah... I retorted that at least the ballet doesn't force their views down my throat, but that (predictably) had no impact at all.
The wheels are already moving in a city near you...
"Old boat guy" (Dr. Greg Johnson) holds degrees in English, Business and Economics from major west coast universities. He is published in several professional journals and enjoys commenting on current "economic politics." He is CEO of Gran Dia Resources Ltd., a privately... More
If newspapers, in general, really did investigative reporting as they used to (rather than public interest junk), then bailing them out would be okay. But a bailout is now a reward for not reporting, but filling a void and a tradition--spinning stuff. Let them go. We can get pap on the internet.
This news story has 6 comments:
On May 05 12:59 PM davidingeorgia wrote:
> of course they're going to get bailed out after working so hard to
> get this administration elected...it's as sure a bet as exists anywhere
> these days.
Not only that, but it will truly end the 1st ammendment and rid any possibility of unbiased reporting.
The wheels are already moving in a city near you...