While it's true the recent moderation in weekly jobless claims is happening from a breathtaking peak, the extent of the drop is impressive. Going back to 1987, such declines have usually happened at the tail end of a recession.
"Old boat guy" (Dr. Greg Johnson) holds degrees in English, Business and Economics from major west coast universities. He is published in several professional journals and enjoys commenting on current "economic politics." He is CEO of Gran Dia Resources Ltd., a privately... More
Yea, sure. These figures are all manipulated to suit the gov't's purpose. How about U6? We are getting to a point that all these statistical releases are doctored shams; thank god for Durden and Lee.
The powers that be have a vested interest in massaging the data.
On May 07 11:21 AM old boat guy wrote:
> Yea, sure. These figures are all manipulated to suit the gov't's > purpose. How about U6? We are getting to a point that all these > statistical releases are doctored shams; thank god for Durden and > Lee.
Sutida is the CEO of Ebeling Heffernan in Asia, socialite and philanthropist. She has earned a reputation in Asia as one of the most influential women to know in Thailand. Sutida is a key participant in determining business strategy and vision. She is responsible for all of the global business... More
Having read time and again during the recent earnings reports that companies, very, very big companies perform better than expected based on reduced spending and reduced staff.
There IS an impact from this reduced spending and staff cuts and that impact is constantly increasing unemployment.
The failures of companies like GM not only have a direct impact of staff at GM but how about the staff at GM suppliers, how about the net total amount of retraction that these things cause?
This news story has 4 comments:
The powers that be have a vested interest in massaging the data.
On May 07 11:21 AM old boat guy wrote:
> Yea, sure. These figures are all manipulated to suit the gov't's
> purpose. How about U6? We are getting to a point that all these
> statistical releases are doctored shams; thank god for Durden and
> Lee.
There IS an impact from this reduced spending and staff cuts and that impact is constantly increasing unemployment.
The failures of companies like GM not only have a direct impact of staff at GM but how about the staff at GM suppliers, how about the net total amount of retraction that these things cause?