Paragon Technologies, Inc.(PGNT)- OTCPK - Current
  • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 15 Jun

    Paragon Technologies $PGNT News Release. http://tinyurl.com/jfczl3b
    Reply
      • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 8 Jun

        Paragon Technologies $PGNT awarded $2.3M contract by USPS. http://bit.ly/22QaCAK
        Reply
          • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 2 Jun

            Paragon $PGNT Calls on Rubicon $RBCN to Explain Appointment of Director with Questionable Record. http://bit.ly/1TYnnWr
            Reply
              • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 1 Jun

                Paragon Technologies $PGNT Responds to Rubicon's $RBCN Weak Turnaround Plan. http://bit.ly/1PjrAoH
                Reply
                  • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 27 May

                    Rubicon $RBCN fights back against Paragon $PGNT and Hesham Gad. http://tinyurl.com/jmdq4d2
                    Reply
                      • Alex B. Gray | Send Message 24 May

                        Paragon $PGNT Asks Rubicon $RBCN Board to Stop Its $1 Million Proxy Campaign to Remain Entrenched. http://tinyurl.com/zwcomtq
                        Reply
                          • Jim Van Meerten | Send Message 14 Mar

                            $PGNT - 48% technical sell signals - 40.27% off its recent high - Relative Strenth Index 41.89%
                            Reply
                              • Jim Van Meerten | Send Message 14 Mar

                                Paragon Tech - Sell Signals $PGNT http://seekingalpha.com/p/2w9pa
                                Reply
                                  • Jim Van Meerten | Send Message 1 Nov 2015

                                    $PGNT 100% Barchart technical buy signals - 11 new highs and up 20.00% in the last month - Relative Strength Index 76.35%
                                    Reply
                                      • Jim Van Meerten | Send Message 1 Nov 2015

                                        Some Speculative Penny Stocks $PGNT, $SGSVF, $EVSNF http://seekingalpha.com/p/2oii4
                                        Reply