iShares Lehman Aggregate Bond (AGG)

All Comments on AGG

  • commenter
    lhoech2
    Apr 10 11:18 AM
    Rebalancing An ETF Portfolio: What To Do Now? [view article]
    Reit better than Internationals? Look at Fidelity Investors booklet of results and you will see that, as a class, Internationals far outdistinces individual Reit's or Sector funds though each have stellar performers as well as some laggards. Lou Hoechstetter, PhD Reply
  • commenter
    billb
    Apr 05 11:19 AM
    My Website
    Overbought/Oversold U.S. ETF Leaderboard [view article]
    Have you ever back tested these conditions to see if this information is actually meaningful? Reply
  • commenter
    Tristan
    Yates
    Mar 18 04:11 PM
    My Website
    36-Month ETF Correlations with Russell 3000 [view article]
    I'm not sure that 36 months is enough of a time frame to use for this research, especially given health care's underperformance and energy's outperformance during the period. If you use the Sector SPDRs, like XLF, XLV, etc, you have a more data to work with. Reply
  • commenter
    JohnB
    Mar 13 12:21 PM
    The Advantages of Bond ETFs [view article]
    Don't forget Vanguard's upcoming Bond ETFs, etf.seekingalpha.com/a... Reply
  • commenter
    Dan Hector
    Mar 12 01:37 PM
    The Advantages of Bond ETFs [view article]
    Thanx for the article and the link the Von Alroth article. Do you know if any one has published a comparison of the costs of owning a Bond ETF vs the direct purchase of a bond portfolio?

    It seems to me that to justify the MER on the ETF - which is annual - the MER must be lower than the difference in bond yield spread the ETF manager should be able to achieve compared to a retail investor (ignoring commissions on the ETF and assuming only treasuries in the portfolio so we can assume away default risk). This comparison would also vary depending on the average duration (a measure of transactions) of the bond portfolio.

    It would be interesting to see this kind of comparison.     Reply
  • commenter
    mahesh reddy
    Mar 12 11:49 AM
    The Advantages of Bond ETFs [view article]
    thanks!.........for the info......Mahesh Reddy Reply
  • commenter
    Beta Hog
    Mar 08 07:52 PM
    Did Specialty ETFs Provide a Cushion From the Fall? [view article]
    Appreciate the summary but regard a "bump-in-the-road... that lasted little more than a week as too short for firm conclusions. A real bear market of many months, whenever it finally arrives, will be much more telling. Most of these instruments are relatively new and haven't yet been tested under the stress of a major, extended decline. As well, the bulk of the foregoing ETFs attempt to exploit the "security-selecti... route to 'alpha' rather than "market-timing&qu... alternative. Too bad the ETF manufacturers haven't given us much choice on the latter. With the advent of inverse ETFs, the "timing" route should now be a cinch - providing, of couse, they could find a reliable TAA methodology to run it. I've developed one but haven't been able to find a manufcturer willing to sponsor a product so far. Any suggestions? Reply
  • commenter
    Maverick
    Bian
    Mar 01 09:31 AM
    Buy-and-Hold As Good As Hedge Funds? [view article]
    It depends on how you define timing here. Statistically earnings from timing the markets, in our words, high frequency trading or very short-term trading with a high portfolio turnover, only represent 7% across the board, per one research source, which means for another 93% as a fund manager you need to take directional bets, more or less. Even for market neutral fund, they take some degree of directional bets on specific positions while on portfolio aggregate level they keep exposure to one designated benchmark almost to zero. Yet, if you were to test them with other benchmarks/risk factors, you might be surprised they in fact not market neutral in a strict sense, especially during a specific time window. Based on market efficiency theory, if you didn't take any risk, you're not supposes to have a return, let alone excess return(no-free lunch theory): that's why equity market neutral/arbitrage hedge funds across the board have been ranked almost on the bottom, compared to other HFRI indices during the past 3 to 5 years. However, they typically use a very large leverage, which increase other risk on other fronts and LTCM is a good example in this regard.

    I looked into almost all timing funds including high-frequency, programming trading, volatility arbitrage, CTA, and the like, and I found most of PMs are former traders or programmers, options traders, futures, stock traders, currency traders, or trading oriented. They like to trade, in their words, “Since most of time orgasm only lasts for a couple of days, why should I hold it for months, and even years?” And most of time, they're running a very highly concentrated portfolio if they target an unbeatable return, except for program-trading and market-neutral funds. I have a friend who is totally a new horn on US stock markets: last year jumped in and have earned more than 1000% so far, compared to overall market return at 16% around. But the risk he has undertook is huge. Personally he may be a good trader, but he's far, far away from a good portfolio manager.

    Typically for timing funds because they need to capture enough themes/catalysts to grow their portfolio fast, so capacity becomes a big issue for most funds in this category. And statistically more than 90% of traders cannot live longer than 5 years unless they can evolve themselves into a well-disciplined risk manager-esque. If Brian Hunter can disciple himself, Amaranth remains a shining star, I guess. If markets are so shallow and you put in so many orders/contracts, you're actually take on a huge risk of be manipulated by others as well as by counterparties. And if JPM could have released its billion-dollar collateral on Friday, and Amaranth would still have been alive; it’s huge sales pressure on Monday that declared the demise of Amaranth, due to the street “rumors”.

    Is buy-and-hold a good strategy? I'm not sure, but if you're running a book with billions of dollars of buying power, you may have no choice but wait for big events like earning surprises or something, because every move you make will have a great effect on the underlying price. Based on my thorough research in the entire hedge fund world, I found most fantastic returns are most likely associated with funds during its every early start-up stage with AUM much less than $50mm. So, if you're not a large investor, a small boutique may give you a surprise from time to time. And if you were to move your comparison window starting from 1990 to 2001, you’ll get the totally different views on the hedge fund industry, I’m sure.

    Still, statistical rules will not apply to a few individual case, so I would suggest you not care too much about the whole industry, only focus on how to improve your own portfolios, because based on some preliminary outcomes from Maverick 500 Hedge Funds Project, there still is enough room to grow your portfolios if you can pick those talented managers. Yet, if you're a pension fund manager like Calpers, I would suggest you go for an FoHFs since you have a specific mandate and need to feed myriads of retirees on a monthly basis while not dipping into the fund’s principal. Only pursing a high return on a few single-manager names is not a good way to go.

    Just my 2 cents!

    Maverick500     Reply
  • commenter
    randy
    thurman
    Mar 01 09:16 AM
    Bernanke Remains Sanguine After Selloff [view article]
    bernanke fiddles while the economy burns. investors and the markets run behind him squealing and pissing their pants like teenage girls after the latest american idol.as an american it's an embarrasment. as a free/independant thinker it's an insult. Reply
  • commenter
    CARMEL
    Mar 01 12:08 AM
    Nuveen Muni Bond CEFs: Worth Considering Over Better Known Bond ETFs [view article]
    GOOD JOB...HELPFUL
    --OPPIE, SAN DIEGO     Reply
  • commenter
    reginald
    browne
    Feb 14 10:03 AM
    Short On Liquidity: Bond ETFs By Average Daily Volume [view article]
    liquidity isn't dicated by trading volume, one should determine the liquidity of the underlying asset that comprise the ETF. Reply
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links: