<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>AQNT - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'AQNT' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt</link>
    <item>
      <title>Is Internet Advertising Really Worth Billions?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/42658-is-internet-advertising-really-worth-billions?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42658</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Over the past few months there’s been a huge amount of consolidation in the online advertising world. Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/13/google-buys-doubleclick/">acquiring</a> Double Click (or at least <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-07-19-n75.html">trying to</a>) for $3 billion and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) acquiring Aquantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/20/did-microsoft-go-lose-it-head-over-aquantive/">for $6 billion</a> were the two biggest examples of this consolidation in the past few months. There are a lot of smart people coming down on both sides of the fence as to whether these are good deals for the companies in question. On the other hand everyone agrees that ad servers are incredibly valuable. DoubleClick and Atlas (aQuantive’s ad serving division) are the 800 pound gorillas in the ad server world. When you take a look at the data it starts to become pretty obvious why.

<p><img title="JC-Ads-1.1" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/JCAds1.1.gif" border="0" height="354" alt="JC-Ads-1.1" width="473" />
</p>
<p>Four out of five people online in June saw a DoubleClick ad and more than four out of five saw an Atlas ad. When you consider the total ad coverage associated with these two behemoths you essentially have coverage over the entire Internet Browser Population. Considering there we’re just over 174 million people online in the US in June, that’s a lot of eyeballs. If we start talking page views then we’re talking over 20 billion ads served to people in the US by Atlas and DoubleClick in June alone.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:17:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Compete</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://compete.com">Compete</a> submits: </strong>Over the past few months there’s been a huge amount of consolidation in the online advertising world. Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/04/13/google-buys-doubleclick/">acquiring</a> Double Click (or at least <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-07-19-n75.html">trying to</a>) for $3 billion and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) acquiring Aquantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/20/did-microsoft-go-lose-it-head-over-aquantive/">for $6 billion</a> were the two biggest examples of this consolidation in the past few months. There are a lot of smart people coming down on both sides of the fence as to whether these are good deals for the companies in question. On the other hand everyone agrees that ad servers are incredibly valuable. DoubleClick and Atlas (aQuantive’s ad serving division) are the 800 pound gorillas in the ad server world. When you take a look at the data it starts to become pretty obvious why.

<p><img title="JC-Ads-1.1" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/JCAds1.1.gif" border="0" height="354" alt="JC-Ads-1.1" width="473" />
</p>
<p>Four out of five people online in June saw a DoubleClick ad and more than four out of five saw an Atlas ad. When you consider the total ad coverage associated with these two behemoths you essentially have coverage over the entire Internet Browser Population. Considering there we’re just over 174 million people online in the US in June, that’s a lot of eyeballs. If we start talking page views then we’re talking over 20 billion ads served to people in the US by Atlas and DoubleClick in June alone.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/42658-is-internet-advertising-really-worth-billions?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/compete">Compete</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Ending my Love Affair with aQuantive</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/41136-why-i-m-ending-my-love-affair-with-aquantive?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41136</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Friday marked the end of my love affair with aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), a company I got to know working in ad sales over the years and a stock I learned to love over the years…

<p>aQuantive was recently acquired by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) in a $6B deal, making it one of the better performing stocks in my portfolio.  Please note that for every hit like this, there are misses.  In fact, I’ve been working on a post on my biggest trading/investing mistakes and there’s so much there that it’s taking a while.
</p>
<p>I was not going to post the lot size, then decided to do so anyway as I want to share a few lessons (under the graph):
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:58:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/ashpicture.jpg' title='ashkan' alt='ashkan' width="80" height="95" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</a> submits: </strong>Friday marked the end of my love affair with aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), a company I got to know working in ad sales over the years and a stock I learned to love over the years…

<p>aQuantive was recently acquired by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) in a $6B deal, making it one of the better performing stocks in my portfolio.  Please note that for every hit like this, there are misses.  In fact, I’ve been working on a post on my biggest trading/investing mistakes and there’s so much there that it’s taking a while.
</p>
<p>I was not going to post the lot size, then decided to do so anyway as I want to share a few lessons (under the graph):
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/41136-why-i-m-ending-my-love-affair-with-aquantive?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ashkan-karbasfrooshan">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>aQuantive/Microsoft Clears Anti-Trust Hurdle, AQNT Gains $1B   </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/40386-aquantive-microsoft-clears-anti-trust-hurdle-aqnt-gains-1b?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40386</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On May 30th I <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1614">commented</a> that aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) was sitting at $5B, even though Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) had agreed to pay $6B for the company.
</p>
<p>Per share, MSFT agreed to pay $66.50 (an 85% premium) even though as recently as May 30th, the stock was only at $63.75.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:58:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/ashpicture.jpg' title='ashkan' alt='ashkan' width="80" height="95" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</a> submits: </strong>On May 30th I <a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/?p=1614">commented</a> that aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) was sitting at $5B, even though Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) had agreed to pay $6B for the company.
</p>
<p>Per share, MSFT agreed to pay $66.50 (an 85% premium) even though as recently as May 30th, the stock was only at $63.75.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/40386-aquantive-microsoft-clears-anti-trust-hurdle-aqnt-gains-1b?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ashkan-karbasfrooshan">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jim Cramer's Mad Money In-Depth Stock Picks, 6/4/07</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/37311-jim-cramer-s-mad-money-in-depth-stock-picks-6-4-07?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Stocks discussed in the in-depth session of Jim Cramer’s Mad Money TV program, <strong>Monday June 4.</strong><strong> Click on a  stock ticker for more analysis:</strong> 
</p>
<p>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:19:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editor Miriam Metzinger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Stocks discussed in the in-depth session of Jim Cramer’s Mad Money TV program, <strong>Monday June 4.</strong><strong> Click on a  stock ticker for more analysis:</strong> 
</p>
<p>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/37311-jim-cramer-s-mad-money-in-depth-stock-picks-6-4-07?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cl">CL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/glw">GLW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pg">PG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rad">RAD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rz">RZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/miriam-metzinger">SA Editor Miriam Metzinger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Painful Lesson on Inaction: How Could I Let aQuantive Get Away?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36771-a-painful-lesson-on-inaction-how-could-i-let-aquantive-get-away?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is a painful tale of inaction - to the tune of missing a 6,000% return overnight due to my own procrastination when I made the case for an aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) takeover on my own blog. So painful in fact, that if it weren't for the timestamps on the blog posting and my submission to <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg.com</a> on Thursday, most investors probably wouldn't believe this tale of love and loss; this reads like a genuine Greek tragedy. I "loved" the potential and highlighted it in my own blog as a great play and "lost" my opportunity in not executing a trade due to procrastination.
</p>
<p>On Thursday, the day before the announcement that sent AQNT shares skyrocketing 76% overnight, I put up a specific post highlighting this as a top pick for a takeover by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) specifically. The very next day, Microsoft announced they would be buying AQNT for over $60 a share when the stock had been in the mid 30s. Although I underestimated the return on the options as a 1000% return, which ended up being a 6,000% return (the buyout premium was much more than the 30% I anticipated, gotta love the leverage of options), the call was as timely and accurate as ever, and from a practical standpoint, as much so as will ever be again in my lifetime. Essentially, this would have been in the same realm as when George Soros made a fortune betting against the British pound overnight (except mine was more lucky luck than calculated manipulation of a foreign currency).
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:52:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Everyday Finance</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href="http://www.everydayfinance.blogspot.com">Dan Pritch</a> submits: </strong>This is a painful tale of inaction - to the tune of missing a 6,000% return overnight due to my own procrastination when I made the case for an aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) takeover on my own blog. So painful in fact, that if it weren't for the timestamps on the blog posting and my submission to <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg.com</a> on Thursday, most investors probably wouldn't believe this tale of love and loss; this reads like a genuine Greek tragedy. I "loved" the potential and highlighted it in my own blog as a great play and "lost" my opportunity in not executing a trade due to procrastination.
</p>
<p>On Thursday, the day before the announcement that sent AQNT shares skyrocketing 76% overnight, I put up a specific post highlighting this as a top pick for a takeover by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) specifically. The very next day, Microsoft announced they would be buying AQNT for over $60 a share when the stock had been in the mid 30s. Although I underestimated the return on the options as a 1000% return, which ended up being a 6,000% return (the buyout premium was much more than the 30% I anticipated, gotta love the leverage of options), the call was as timely and accurate as ever, and from a practical standpoint, as much so as will ever be again in my lifetime. Essentially, this would have been in the same realm as when George Soros made a fortune betting against the British pound overnight (except mine was more lucky luck than calculated manipulation of a foreign currency).
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36771-a-painful-lesson-on-inaction-how-could-i-let-aquantive-get-away?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/everyday-finance">Everyday Finance</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why aQuantive Was Worth Twice As Much As DoubleClick</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36377-why-aquantive-was-worth-twice-as-much-as-doubleclick?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36377</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In 2003, I began to buy shares in DoubleClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dclk' title='More opinion and analysis of DCLK'>DCLK</a>), ValueClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>), aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), Fastclick, etc.  [Fastclick was bought by VCLK, eventually]. If it was in online ads, I was long.  
</p>
<p>Over the years, I sold most of these shares because the stocks rose from high single digits to $20 or so.  The one company I bought back every single time was AQNT.  Last week, AQNT  founders hit the jackpot when Microsoft (MSFT_ paid $66.50 a share or an 85% premium.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 18:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/ashpicture.jpg' title='ashkan' alt='ashkan' width="80" height="95" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.watchmojo.com/web/blog/">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</a> submits: </strong>In 2003, I began to buy shares in DoubleClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dclk' title='More opinion and analysis of DCLK'>DCLK</a>), ValueClick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>), aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), Fastclick, etc.  [Fastclick was bought by VCLK, eventually]. If it was in online ads, I was long.  
</p>
<p>Over the years, I sold most of these shares because the stocks rose from high single digits to $20 or so.  The one company I bought back every single time was AQNT.  Last week, AQNT  founders hit the jackpot when Microsoft (MSFT_ paid $66.50 a share or an 85% premium.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36377-why-aquantive-was-worth-twice-as-much-as-doubleclick?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/ashkan-karbasfrooshan">Ashkan Karbasfrooshan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Internet Advertising Consolidation: Strategic Transactions, No Matter the Cost</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36219-internet-advertising-consolidation-strategic-transactions-no-matter-the-cost?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36219</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In the past month and a half there has been a tremendous consolidation in Internet advertising.
</p>
<blockquote>
<li><strong>May 18:</strong> Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) announces it will pay $6b in cash for aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), parent to digital agencies Avenue A, Razorfish, Atlas and DRIVEpm.  That price constitutes a huge premium relative to $442m in ’06 revenue (net income was $54m)
</li><li><strong>May 17:</strong> British advertising giant WPP Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wppgy' title='More opinion and analysis of WPPGY'>WPPGY</a>), which is known for its offline ad services,  announced it would acquire 24/7 Real Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm' title='More opinion and analysis of TFSM'>TFSM</a>) for $649m. (the price represented a premium of approximately 17x EBITDA)
</li><li><strong>April 30:</strong> Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) acquired the 80% of internet ad auction exchange Right Media it didn’t own for approximately $680m.
</li><li><strong>April 13:</strong> Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) acquires DoubleClick for $3.1b (price represents approximately 20x EBITDA)
</li></blockquote>
<p>Much commentary referring to these deals has focused on the seemingly extreme valuations.  Quite a bit has also suggested each new acquisition was an answer to the one that came before; a suggestion  as if each acquisition had been a part of a game of competitive one-upsmanship between Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:14:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Seth Gilbert</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.metue.com'> Seth Gilbert</a> submits:</strong>In the past month and a half there has been a tremendous consolidation in Internet advertising.
</p>
<blockquote>
<li><strong>May 18:</strong> Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) announces it will pay $6b in cash for aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), parent to digital agencies Avenue A, Razorfish, Atlas and DRIVEpm.  That price constitutes a huge premium relative to $442m in ’06 revenue (net income was $54m)
</li><li><strong>May 17:</strong> British advertising giant WPP Group (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wppgy' title='More opinion and analysis of WPPGY'>WPPGY</a>), which is known for its offline ad services,  announced it would acquire 24/7 Real Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm' title='More opinion and analysis of TFSM'>TFSM</a>) for $649m. (the price represented a premium of approximately 17x EBITDA)
</li><li><strong>April 30:</strong> Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) acquired the 80% of internet ad auction exchange Right Media it didn’t own for approximately $680m.
</li><li><strong>April 13:</strong> Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) acquires DoubleClick for $3.1b (price represents approximately 20x EBITDA)
</li></blockquote>
<p>Much commentary referring to these deals has focused on the seemingly extreme valuations.  Quite a bit has also suggested each new acquisition was an answer to the one that came before; a suggestion  as if each acquisition had been a part of a game of competitive one-upsmanship between Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36219-internet-advertising-consolidation-strategic-transactions-no-matter-the-cost?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog">GOOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm">TFSM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wppgy">WPPGY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/seth-gilbert">Seth Gilbert</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The Harsh Light Shines on Microsoft's aQuantive Deal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36203-the-harsh-light-shines-on-microsoft-s-aquantive-deal?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36203</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/35997">wrote</a> about Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) deal over the weekend, saying that it made no financial sense. Well, apparently, I have company. Both the infamous Microsoft mole, <a href="http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2007/05/ack-as-in-ackquisition.html">Mini-Microsoft</a>, and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/20/did-microsoft-go-lose-it-head-over-aquantive/">Kevin Kelleher at GigaOM</a> are verbalizing what I think is everyone's astonishment at Microsoft's six billion dollar deal from last Friday. I think Kevin does a nice job of putting this in perspective:
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>I’ve been trying to find a way to illustrate just how screwy Microsoft’s $6 billion bid for aQuantive is, and here it is: For $6 billion in cash, Microsoft could have hired, in a single day, 60,000 engineers and salespeople (plus managers to make sure they earn their pay) - paying each one of them a $100,000 salary.
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:25:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Howe</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/chowenew70px2.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="74" border='1' /> <strong>Carl Howe (<a href="http://www.blackfriarsinc.com/">Blackfriars Communications</a>) submits: </strong>I <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/35997">wrote</a> about Microsoft's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) deal over the weekend, saying that it made no financial sense. Well, apparently, I have company. Both the infamous Microsoft mole, <a href="http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2007/05/ack-as-in-ackquisition.html">Mini-Microsoft</a>, and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/05/20/did-microsoft-go-lose-it-head-over-aquantive/">Kevin Kelleher at GigaOM</a> are verbalizing what I think is everyone's astonishment at Microsoft's six billion dollar deal from last Friday. I think Kevin does a nice job of putting this in perspective:
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>I’ve been trying to find a way to illustrate just how screwy Microsoft’s $6 billion bid for aQuantive is, and here it is: For $6 billion in cash, Microsoft could have hired, in a single day, 60,000 engineers and salespeople (plus managers to make sure they earn their pay) - paying each one of them a $100,000 salary.
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36203-the-harsh-light-shines-on-microsoft-s-aquantive-deal?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-howe">Carl Howe</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft's aQuantive Deal: An Act of Desperation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36090-microsoft-s-aquantive-deal-an-act-of-desperation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36090</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Undoubtedly, the biggest story the last week on Wall Street was Microsoft’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) $6 Billion buy out offer of aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>).  This represented a close to 80% premium on the stock price and its price and volume soared.  An exciting deal for aQuantive shareholders, but could it also be an act of desperation by Microsoft?
</p>
<p>This nature of this deal and the discussion around it encouraged me to look deeper into the numbers and the motivations for this monster buyout.  Microsoft certainly did not get aQuantive on the cheap – paying close to 80 times the Internet advertising agency's trailing 12 months levered free cash flow. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 13:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Terence Channon</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TerenceChannon.jpg' title='Terence Channon' alt='Terence Channon' width="62" height="88" align=left hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.ziesley.com/">Terence Channon</a> submits: </strong>
Undoubtedly, the biggest story the last week on Wall Street was Microsoft’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) $6 Billion buy out offer of aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>).  This represented a close to 80% premium on the stock price and its price and volume soared.  An exciting deal for aQuantive shareholders, but could it also be an act of desperation by Microsoft?
</p>
<p>This nature of this deal and the discussion around it encouraged me to look deeper into the numbers and the motivations for this monster buyout.  Microsoft certainly did not get aQuantive on the cheap – paying close to 80 times the Internet advertising agency's trailing 12 months levered free cash flow. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36090-microsoft-s-aquantive-deal-an-act-of-desperation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/terence-channon">Terence Channon</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft's Bid for aQuantive Indicates Desperation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36101-microsoft-s-bid-for-aquantive-indicates-desperation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This stunning bid for online advertising firm aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) seems to stem from simply missing out on deals that competitors have made and feeling the need to get something, anything, done. After talks with Yahoo! (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) went nowhere and Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) bought Doubleclick for $3.1 billion, Microsoft had two options if it felt they needed to keep up with everybody else; buy aQuantive or Valueclick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>).

<p>Not only did they go with aQuantive, but they paid an astronomical price. Shares of AQNT were trading at $36 yesterday and that quote was pricing in a lot of buyout speculation already. Somehow they got Ballmer and Company to offer more than $66 per share in cash, an 85% premium. Such a bid puts Mister Softy on the hook for a cash outlay of $6 billion. In return, it gets a business at 104 times trailing earnings, 86 times current year earnings, and a whopping 67 times 2008 earnings.
</p>
<p>Is it a good move, given the price tag? I can't see how it could be. Based on 2006 sales figures, AQNT will represent less than 1% of Microsoft's revenue. This deal can hardly move the needle for them, in my view. Sure, it will add some expertise in a field that the company is struggling with, but given that this deal is just being done to keep up with acquisitions already announced by competitors, Microsoft is just keeping pace with rivals, not gaining on them.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 05:24:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Chad Brand</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/chadbrand_01.jpg' alt='' width="70" height="88" border='0' align="left" hspace="7" vspace="6"/><a href="http://www.peridotcapital.com/"><strong>Chad Brand</a> submits: </strong>This stunning bid for online advertising firm aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) by Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) seems to stem from simply missing out on deals that competitors have made and feeling the need to get something, anything, done. After talks with Yahoo! (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) went nowhere and Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) bought Doubleclick for $3.1 billion, Microsoft had two options if it felt they needed to keep up with everybody else; buy aQuantive or Valueclick (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk' title='More opinion and analysis of VCLK'>VCLK</a>).

<p>Not only did they go with aQuantive, but they paid an astronomical price. Shares of AQNT were trading at $36 yesterday and that quote was pricing in a lot of buyout speculation already. Somehow they got Ballmer and Company to offer more than $66 per share in cash, an 85% premium. Such a bid puts Mister Softy on the hook for a cash outlay of $6 billion. In return, it gets a business at 104 times trailing earnings, 86 times current year earnings, and a whopping 67 times 2008 earnings.
</p>
<p>Is it a good move, given the price tag? I can't see how it could be. Based on 2006 sales figures, AQNT will represent less than 1% of Microsoft's revenue. This deal can hardly move the needle for them, in my view. Sure, it will add some expertise in a field that the company is struggling with, but given that this deal is just being done to keep up with acquisitions already announced by competitors, Microsoft is just keeping pace with rivals, not gaining on them.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36101-microsoft-s-bid-for-aquantive-indicates-desperation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/chad-brand">Chad Brand</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Advertising Infrastructure Organizes Itself</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36007-the-new-advertising-infrastructure-organizes-itself?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36007</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[WSJ reports: 
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) announced plans to acquire Internet advertising company aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) in a deal valued at about $6 billion, or $66.50 a share, a significant premium. Founded in 1997, aQuantive is the parent company of Avenue A/Razorfish, Atlas Media Console and Drive PM.<br />
</blockquote>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 04:14:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Sramana Mitra</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/sramanamitranew.jpg' title='sramana mitra' alt='sramana mitra' width="75" height="77" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://www.sramanamitra.com">Sramana Mitra</a> submits: </strong>WSJ reports: 
</p>
<blockquote class="quote"><p>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) announced plans to acquire Internet advertising company aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) in a deal valued at about $6 billion, or $66.50 a share, a significant premium. Founded in 1997, aQuantive is the parent company of Avenue A/Razorfish, Atlas Media Console and Drive PM.<br />
</blockquote>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36007-the-new-advertising-infrastructure-organizes-itself?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/sramana-mitra">Sramana Mitra</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Online Ad Bubble: aQuantive Deal Makes No Financial Sense For Microsoft</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/35997-online-ad-bubble-aquantive-deal-makes-no-financial-sense-for-microsoft?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35997</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not to be outdone by Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) in overpaying for online advertising companies, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) will pay $6 billion for ad company aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), corporate parent of Avenue A / Razorfish (link to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, <a href=" Headline One  Headline Two  Interactive Q&As  Interviews  Jim Cramer's Picks  Long Ideas  Market Outlook  Market Summary  Mergers & Acquisitions  News Briefs  Options  Reader Picks  Resources  Online Brokers  Books  SA Site News  Sector Themes  Internet Search  Internet Content/Community  Internet Infrastructure">article</a>, subscription required). To put that in perspective, aQuantive's revenue last year was $442 million, so Microsoft is paying almost 14 times revenue for the company. Compare that with the Doubleclick acquisition by Google, where Google paid only 10 times its $300 million revenue. Microsoft's own Don Dodge <a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2007/03/should_microsof.html">even called</a> a $2 billion acquisition of Doubleclick out of line.
</p>
<p>If anyone needed proof that the online ad business is in the middle of a bubble of valuations, this is an excellent data point. Blackfriars' survey of US businesses says that senior executives in US companies <a href="http://blackfriarsinc.com/m07q1-release.html">plan to spend less on marketing and advertising this year</a> than in any quarter in the last three. With that as a backdrop, it will take Microsoft more than a decade to recoup the $6 billion it is investing in aQuantive, if ever. And with Microsoft <a href="http://ce.seekingalpha.com/article/34354">already tapping deferred revenue assets to deliver numbers that Wall Street likes</a>, throwing billions more at opportunities like this isn't going to help its stagnant stock price.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 07:30:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Howe</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/chowenew70px2.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="74" border='1' /> <strong>Carl Howe (<a href="http://www.blackfriarsinc.com/">Blackfriars Communications</a>) submits: </strong>Not to be outdone by Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) in overpaying for online advertising companies, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) will pay $6 billion for ad company aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), corporate parent of Avenue A / Razorfish (link to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, <a href=" Headline One  Headline Two  Interactive Q&As  Interviews  Jim Cramer's Picks  Long Ideas  Market Outlook  Market Summary  Mergers & Acquisitions  News Briefs  Options  Reader Picks  Resources  Online Brokers  Books  SA Site News  Sector Themes  Internet Search  Internet Content/Community  Internet Infrastructure">article</a>, subscription required). To put that in perspective, aQuantive's revenue last year was $442 million, so Microsoft is paying almost 14 times revenue for the company. Compare that with the Doubleclick acquisition by Google, where Google paid only 10 times its $300 million revenue. Microsoft's own Don Dodge <a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2007/03/should_microsof.html">even called</a> a $2 billion acquisition of Doubleclick out of line.
</p>
<p>If anyone needed proof that the online ad business is in the middle of a bubble of valuations, this is an excellent data point. Blackfriars' survey of US businesses says that senior executives in US companies <a href="http://blackfriarsinc.com/m07q1-release.html">plan to spend less on marketing and advertising this year</a> than in any quarter in the last three. With that as a backdrop, it will take Microsoft more than a decade to recoup the $6 billion it is investing in aQuantive, if ever. And with Microsoft <a href="http://ce.seekingalpha.com/article/34354">already tapping deferred revenue assets to deliver numbers that Wall Street likes</a>, throwing billions more at opportunities like this isn't going to help its stagnant stock price.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/35997-online-ad-bubble-aquantive-deal-makes-no-financial-sense-for-microsoft?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-howe">Carl Howe</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>aQuantive Will Solve Some Of Microsoft's Web Woes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36001-aquantive-will-solve-some-of-microsoft-s-web-woes?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Always nice to make a good call, and Jason Jones <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/35926">made a great one Friday</a>--that aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) would be one of the next digital advertising companies to go in the panicked land-grab of the web elephants.  Even Jason probably didn't imagine that he'd be so right so soon, but we're proud of him.
</p>
<p>Sick of forever being outbid and then having to mumble about "expensive" amid the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)-Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) celebrations, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) made a preemptive offer on this one.  At 2% of Microsoft's market value, the acquisition is still a tuck-in, but it's the biggest one in Microsoft's history.  aQuantive won't solve all of Microsoft's web problems, but it will solve some of them.  Most importantly, it will mean that Microsoft's web business must--at least temporarily--be taken seriously again.   </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 07:20:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Henry Blodget</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/hblodget70px.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="97" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/">Henry Blodget</a> submits: </strong>Always nice to make a good call, and Jason Jones <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/35926">made a great one Friday</a>--that aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) would be one of the next digital advertising companies to go in the panicked land-grab of the web elephants.  Even Jason probably didn't imagine that he'd be so right so soon, but we're proud of him.
</p>
<p>Sick of forever being outbid and then having to mumble about "expensive" amid the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)-Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>) celebrations, Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) made a preemptive offer on this one.  At 2% of Microsoft's market value, the acquisition is still a tuck-in, but it's the biggest one in Microsoft's history.  aQuantive won't solve all of Microsoft's web problems, but it will solve some of them.  Most importantly, it will mean that Microsoft's web business must--at least temporarily--be taken seriously again.   </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36001-aquantive-will-solve-some-of-microsoft-s-web-woes?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/henry-blodget">Henry Blodget</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft's aQuantive Buyout A Sign of Newfound Aggression</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36002-microsoft-s-aquantive-buyout-a-sign-of-newfound-aggression?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36002</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That Seattle-based aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) was in play was one of the worst-kept supposed secrets in recent dealmaking history. It had been talked about for most of the year, and Google's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) DoubleClick deal had sealed the likelihood.

<p>What has surprised people, however, with Friday's Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/venture/archives/115541.asp">deal</a> for aQuantive is the towering premium Microsoft was willing to pay for the company. A $6-billion deal and an 86% premium to Thursday's close is Murdoch-ian, the kind of "shut up and sing" (or at least shut up and sell ads) price that says let's stop talking and just get this over with.
</p>
<p>But it's more than that too. It's also a sign of newfound aggression from Microsoft, an example of it saying that it can play the price premium game, locking out competitors like Google and Yahoo by playing bid-'em-up.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 07:19:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Kedrosky</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/paulkedroskynew.jpg' title='paul kedrosky' alt='paul kedrosky' width="75" height="89" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/">Paul Kedrosky</a> submits: </strong>That Seattle-based aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>) was in play was one of the worst-kept supposed secrets in recent dealmaking history. It had been talked about for most of the year, and Google's (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>) DoubleClick deal had sealed the likelihood.

<p>What has surprised people, however, with Friday's Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>) <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/venture/archives/115541.asp">deal</a> for aQuantive is the towering premium Microsoft was willing to pay for the company. A $6-billion deal and an 86% premium to Thursday's close is Murdoch-ian, the kind of "shut up and sing" (or at least shut up and sell ads) price that says let's stop talking and just get this over with.
</p>
<p>But it's more than that too. It's also a sign of newfound aggression from Microsoft, an example of it saying that it can play the price premium game, locking out competitors like Google and Yahoo by playing bid-'em-up.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36002-microsoft-s-aquantive-buyout-a-sign-of-newfound-aggression?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/paul-kedrosky">Paul Kedrosky</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jim Cramer's Stop Trading! Stock Picks and Comments, May 18</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/36018-jim-cramer-s-stop-trading-stock-picks-and-comments-may-18?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">36018</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Recap of Jim Cramer’s comments on Stop Trading! <strong>Friday May 18.</strong><strong> Click on a stock ticker for more analysis:</strong>
<br />

</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>):</strong> Cramer calls MSFT's bid to buy AQNT at $6 billion a "game changer," and he doesn't see any reason why it wouldn't also buy YHOO for $50 billion. The bid may usher in the beginning of a "land grab against Google." While Cramer wouldn't buy a down company solely because of a potential takeover, he notes YHOO has great traffic and thinks the stock could reach $34 immediately if CEO Terry Semel takes a "permanent vacation." 
</p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 05:49:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editor Miriam Metzinger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Recap of Jim Cramer’s comments on Stop Trading! <strong>Friday May 18.</strong><strong> Click on a stock ticker for more analysis:</strong>
<br />

</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='More opinion and analysis of MSFT'>MSFT</a>), aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>), Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>):</strong> Cramer calls MSFT's bid to buy AQNT at $6 billion a "game changer," and he doesn't see any reason why it wouldn't also buy YHOO for $50 billion. The bid may usher in the beginning of a "land grab against Google." While Cramer wouldn't buy a down company solely because of a potential takeover, he notes YHOO has great traffic and thinks the stock could reach $34 immediately if CEO Terry Semel takes a "permanent vacation." 
</p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/36018-jim-cramer-s-stop-trading-stock-picks-and-comments-may-18?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cne">CNE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dks">DKS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/grp">GRP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gw">GW</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hal">HAL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nbr">NBR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vz">VZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/miriam-metzinger">SA Editor Miriam Metzinger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did Microsoft Panic With This aQuantive Buy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/35986-did-microsoft-panic-with-this-aquantive-buy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35986</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Microsoft, loser of the <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4842">DoubleClick sweepstakes</a> and rumored to buy almost every online advertising company on the planet, is now on the bandwagon. The company acquired aQuantive for $6 billion.
</p>
<p>Microsoft will pay all cash for aQuantive. The company paid a whopping $66.50 a share for the company. Aquantive closed at $35.87 on Thursday. The acquisition is the largest in Microsoft’s history.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:17:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Larry Dignan</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/dignanwtbkd.gif' title='larry dignan' alt='larry dignan' width="65" height="70" border='0' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>Larry Dignan (<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL">ZDNet</a>) submits: </strong>Microsoft, loser of the <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4842">DoubleClick sweepstakes</a> and rumored to buy almost every online advertising company on the planet, is now on the bandwagon. The company acquired aQuantive for $6 billion.
</p>
<p>Microsoft will pay all cash for aQuantive. The company paid a whopping $66.50 a share for the company. Aquantive closed at $35.87 on Thursday. The acquisition is the largest in Microsoft’s history.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/35986-did-microsoft-panic-with-this-aquantive-buy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/larry-dignan">Larry Dignan</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft Pays Up for aQuantive</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/35980-microsoft-pays-up-for-aquantive?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35980</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/type/wall-street-breakfast"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SACoffeeCup80.jpg" vspace="1" border="0" height="66" hspace="1" align="right" alt="" width="80" /></a>
</p>
<p>Microsoft announced Friday it would acquire web advertising firm aQuantive Inc. for about $66.50/share -- an 85% premium to Thursday's close of $35.87. AQNT shares are trading at $65 in the pre-market. The move, which will cost Microsoft about $6 billion, follows WPP Group's acquisition of web advertiser 24/7 Real Media on Thursday for $650 million; it had been rumored Microsoft might attempt to buy 24/7. Other recent consolidation in the sector includes Google buying DoubleClick for $3.1 billion and Yahoo taking the remaining stake in Right Media for $680 million, both in April. In a post on Seeking Alpha Thursday, contributor Jason Jones looked at aQuantive's potential buyout value. His conclusion: "AQNT is worth $44 if you use the 24/7 Real Media take-out multiple (23x), $60 if you use the DoubleClick multiple (33x), and $75 if you use the Right Media multiple (10x EV/Revs)." Microsoft said in its press release the acquisition would help it provide a "world class, internet-wide advertising platform." Its units include the Atlas media toolset, DRIVEpm that matches ad inventory with availability, and its Avenue A/Razorfish ad agency. <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Microsoft18052007Chart.png"><img title="Microsoft 18 05 2007 Chart" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-Microsoft18052007Chart.png" vspace="3" border="0" height="94" hspace="3" align="right" alt="Microsoft 18 05 2007 Chart" style="border: 1px solid grey;" width="150" /></a> <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/aQuantive18052007Chart.png"><img title="aQuantive 18 05 2007 Chart" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-aQuantive18052007Chart.png" vspace="3" border="0" height="94" hspace="3" align="right" alt="aQuantive 18 05 2007 Chart" style="border: 1px solid grey;" width="150" /></a>Microsoft expects to close the deal in the second half of 2007. Analysts note the deal may serve as proof Microsoft has no intention of joining forces with Yahoo, as has been rumored recently. Microsoft said the deal would not have a significant impact on its previously provided financial outlook. Its shares are down 0.4% to $30.85 in pre-market trading. Shares of ValueClick, the only remaining soloist in web advertising, are up 7.25% to $29.90.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 09:35:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>SA Editor Eli Hoffmann</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/type/wall-street-breakfast"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/SACoffeeCup80.jpg" vspace="1" border="0" height="66" hspace="1" align="right" alt="" width="80" /></a>
</p>
<p>Microsoft announced Friday it would acquire web advertising firm aQuantive Inc. for about $66.50/share -- an 85% premium to Thursday's close of $35.87. AQNT shares are trading at $65 in the pre-market. The move, which will cost Microsoft about $6 billion, follows WPP Group's acquisition of web advertiser 24/7 Real Media on Thursday for $650 million; it had been rumored Microsoft might attempt to buy 24/7. Other recent consolidation in the sector includes Google buying DoubleClick for $3.1 billion and Yahoo taking the remaining stake in Right Media for $680 million, both in April. In a post on Seeking Alpha Thursday, contributor Jason Jones looked at aQuantive's potential buyout value. His conclusion: "AQNT is worth $44 if you use the 24/7 Real Media take-out multiple (23x), $60 if you use the DoubleClick multiple (33x), and $75 if you use the Right Media multiple (10x EV/Revs)." Microsoft said in its press release the acquisition would help it provide a "world class, internet-wide advertising platform." Its units include the Atlas media toolset, DRIVEpm that matches ad inventory with availability, and its Avenue A/Razorfish ad agency. <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Microsoft18052007Chart.png"><img title="Microsoft 18 05 2007 Chart" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-Microsoft18052007Chart.png" vspace="3" border="0" height="94" hspace="3" align="right" alt="Microsoft 18 05 2007 Chart" style="border: 1px solid grey;" width="150" /></a> <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/aQuantive18052007Chart.png"><img title="aQuantive 18 05 2007 Chart" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/thumb-aQuantive18052007Chart.png" vspace="3" border="0" height="94" hspace="3" align="right" alt="aQuantive 18 05 2007 Chart" style="border: 1px solid grey;" width="150" /></a>Microsoft expects to close the deal in the second half of 2007. Analysts note the deal may serve as proof Microsoft has no intention of joining forces with Yahoo, as has been rumored recently. Microsoft said the deal would not have a significant impact on its previously provided financial outlook. Its shares are down 0.4% to $30.85 in pre-market trading. Shares of ValueClick, the only remaining soloist in web advertising, are up 7.25% to $29.90.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/35980-microsoft-pays-up-for-aquantive?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft">MSFT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eli-hoffmann">SA Editor Eli Hoffmann</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>M&amp;A in the Digital Ad Sector is Smoking Hot: Who's Next?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/35926-m-a-in-the-digital-ad-sector-is-smoking-hot-who-s-next?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35926</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The digital advertising industry consolidation continues.  Interestingly, most of the acquisitions have been cash deals.  Why aren't the big guys using their pricey stocks?  Maybe the acquirees have negotiating leverage.  (Or maybe the acquirers are hallucinating that their stocks are undervalued).
</p>
<p>A list of recent M&A in the sector is below.  But first, here are the single folks still waiting to be scooped up:
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 03:39:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Jason Jones</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/jasonjones3.jpg' title='jason jones' alt='jason jones' width="75" height="81" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/">Jason Jones</a> submits: </strong>The digital advertising industry consolidation continues.  Interestingly, most of the acquisitions have been cash deals.  Why aren't the big guys using their pricey stocks?  Maybe the acquirees have negotiating leverage.  (Or maybe the acquirers are hallucinating that their stocks are undervalued).
</p>
<p>A list of recent M&A in the sector is below.  But first, here are the single folks still waiting to be scooped up:
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/35926-m-a-in-the-digital-ad-sector-is-smoking-hot-who-s-next?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm">TFSM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vclk">VCLK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/jason-jones">Jason Jones</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>aQuantive Q1 2007 Earnings Call Transcript</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/34899-aquantive-q1-2007-earnings-call-transcript?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34899</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<table cellspacing="2" border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td><b><font face="arial" size="-2">TRANSCRIPT SPONSOR</font><br /><a href="http://cornerstoneondemand.com" target="_blank"><img title="Cornerstone OnDemand Logo" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/CornerstoneOnDemandLogo.png?" border="0" height="66" hspace="6" alt="Cornerstone OnDemand Logo" width="251" /></a>
</b></td>
</tr>
</table><p>aQuantive, Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>)
<br />
Q1 2007 Earnings Call
<br />
May 08, 2007 8:30 am ET
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:52:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>
</p>
<table cellspacing="2" border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td><b><font face="arial" size="-2">TRANSCRIPT SPONSOR</font><br /><a href="http://cornerstoneondemand.com" target="_blank"><img title="Cornerstone OnDemand Logo" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/CornerstoneOnDemandLogo.png?" border="0" height="66" hspace="6" alt="Cornerstone OnDemand Logo" width="251" /></a>
</b></td>
</tr>
</table><p>aQuantive, Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>)
<br />
Q1 2007 Earnings Call
<br />
May 08, 2007 8:30 am ET
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/34899-aquantive-q1-2007-earnings-call-transcript?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aquantive Shares Set To Soar On Blazing Q1 Results</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/34895-aquantive-shares-set-to-soar-on-blazing-q1-results?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34895</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In case you were wondering why there’s such a feeding frenzy around the digital marketing business right now - the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)/Doubleclick deal, the Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>)/Right Media combination, speculation about 24/7 Real Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm' title='More opinion and analysis of TFSM'>TFSM</a>) - consider this morning’s first quarter earnings report from aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>). The business is on fire.

<p>For the quarter, aQuantive <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070508/20070508005463.html?.v=1">reported revenue</a> of $142.6 million and EPS of 16 cents a share, crushing the Street estimates of $122.79 million and 9 cents. For the second quarter, the company sees revenue of $148 million to $153 million, with net income of $13 million to $14.5 million; the Street had revenue at $138 million. 
</p>
<p>For the full year, aQuantive sees revenue of $595 million to $615 million, beating the Street consensus of $570.73 million.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:41:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Savitz</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/esavitz70px.jpg' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="70" height="95" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/">Eric Savitz</a> (Barron's) submits: </strong>In case you were wondering why there’s such a feeding frenzy around the digital marketing business right now - the Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='More opinion and analysis of GOOG'>GOOG</a>)/Doubleclick deal, the Yahoo (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/yhoo' title='More opinion and analysis of YHOO'>YHOO</a>)/Right Media combination, speculation about 24/7 Real Media (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tfsm' title='More opinion and analysis of TFSM'>TFSM</a>) - consider this morning’s first quarter earnings report from aQuantive (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt' title='More opinion and analysis of AQNT'>AQNT</a>). The business is on fire.

<p>For the quarter, aQuantive <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070508/20070508005463.html?.v=1">reported revenue</a> of $142.6 million and EPS of 16 cents a share, crushing the Street estimates of $122.79 million and 9 cents. For the second quarter, the company sees revenue of $148 million to $153 million, with net income of $13 million to $14.5 million; the Street had revenue at $138 million. 
</p>
<p>For the full year, aQuantive sees revenue of $595 million to $615 million, beating the Street consensus of $570.73 million.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/34895-aquantive-shares-set-to-soar-on-blazing-q1-results?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aqnt">AQNT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/eric-savitz">Eric Savitz</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
