Baidu.com, Inc. (BIDU)

All Comments on BIDU

  • commenter
    BlueOkie
    Sep 15 01:56 PM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    If 95% of the people will get a tax reduction under B.O.; how does the math work for the 40% of people who pay no taxes at all? I guess there is 135% taxpayers? Reply
  • commenter
    jmmx
    Sep 15 01:51 PM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    Reagan

    Only moron here is you.
     Reply
  • commenter
    dsrtwriter
    Sep 15 01:09 PM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    Nice partisan try, willking. Probably a good reason for SA comments to stay away from party stuff. This is a bipartisan reaming of the investor.
    As you may know and ignore, the biggest obstacle to auditing and oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac was the Democrat powerful in Congress controlling the committees- Barney Frank ,Chris Dodd and others. They fought any attempts in the past to scrutinize these failed institutions.

    And as you choose to ignore, Fanny Mae was a major contributor to Obama. Obama is just another articulate and attractive face on the old Chicago political machine. To expect him to "lead us into prosperity and allow the nation to shine again" ranks right along with Oprah's coronation of Barry as the "chosen one".

    Failing societies always look for a Messiah, and we have descended to that level.

    Let's get back pertinent investor comments. The election will happen,one way or another.     Reply
  • commenter
    reagan
    Sep 15 10:46 AM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    Yea, responsible for 9/11 is what the loser democrats are! Democrats responsible? Sounds oxymoronic! Reply
  • commenter
    willking
    Sep 15 09:04 AM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    I agree with User 26737. King George III has done a job on us for eight long years. Everything he has touched has turned to nothingness or worse. Hopefully, Obama will surround himself with brainy and competent people who can extract us from the messes the King has saddled us with and lead us into prosperity and allow the nation to shine again. The damage done is so extensive that It will take a lot of doing. Reply
  • commenter
    User 138602
    Sep 15 09:00 AM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    all our representatives ,republicans and democrats,are to blame. They seem to be interested in protecting the big institutions only at the expense of the small investors and the taxpayers. That s what we call capitalism at its best ,rich get richer and poor get poorer. We must all pay for the fat cats greed and poor decisions .The stock options are the source of all this mess, get rid of it ,today,period. Reply
  • commenter
    User 262492
    Sep 15 08:36 AM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    Right, blame it all on George Bush! That's certainly the kind of clear thinking you need these days. That and "the Democrats will fix it all." You should do just fine. Reply
  • commenter
    User 26737
    Sep 15 08:24 AM
    How Would Lehman's Liquidation Affect Its Top Holdings? [view article]
    THE KING GEORGE III BUSH LEGACY Reply
  • commenter
    Partners in
    Grime
    Sep 14 08:58 PM
    My Website
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    Apple is in an enviable position. Once the market recovers they'll be stratospheric. Reply
  • commenter
    jmmx
    Sep 14 04:19 PM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    "pussies on national security"

    Squawk, Squawk, Squawk, - parrot the right-wing propaganda. Then you do not have to think. Not sure how anyone could have found terrorists over what they were thinking. We DO know that prople in FBI/CIA went to C Rice and she ignored them. But no - the dems are responsible for anything during their administration, and anything that happens AFTER their administration, and the republicans never take responsibility for anything! Like I said above they are the "It's not MY fault" party.

    I think it is about time we get in a party that is responsible.
     Reply
  • commenter
    reagan
    Sep 14 01:20 PM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    I really could care less what you think about Reagan or the republican party for that matter. 9/11 was all planned on Clinton's watch & finally executed 8 months into GW's first term. Democrats are notorious for being such pussies when it comes to our national security & its well demonstrated by lame ass Carter & the inept Clinton. Wikepedia, is known to slant left when it comes to their "facts", Einstein. Whether you like it or not, Reagan is considered to be one of our top ten presidents of all time. Something the rapist will never be equated to.
    Poor Bill. Always will remembered for disgracing the office & of course be known for that darn "blue dress!"     Reply
  • commenter
    jmmx
    Sep 14 04:29 AM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    From Wikipedia - This shows how the Reagan administration was involved in helping S Hussein to produce chemical weapons.

    Now taxpayers have to pay $1 Trillion to clean up that mess. Notice that Donald Rumsfeld was the special envoy to the Mideast - there is a photo of him shaking hands with Hussein himself. WOW - what a good decision that was!

    "According to retired Army Colonel W. Patrick Lang, senior defense intelligence officer for the United States Defense Intelligence Agency at the time, "the use of gas on the battlefield by the Iraqis was not a matter of deep strategic concern" to Reagan and his aides, because they "were desperate to make sure that Iraq did not lose."[13] Lang cautioned that the Defense Intelligence Agency "would have never accepted the use of chemical weapons against civilians, but the use against military objectives was seen as inevitable in the Iraqi struggle for survival. Despite this claim, the Reagan administration did not stop aiding Iraq after receiving reports affirming the use of poison gas on Kurdish civilians.[14][15]
    "

    "On 25 May 1994, The U.S. Senate Banking Committee released a report in which it was stated that "pathogenic (meaning 'disease producing'), toxigenic (meaning 'poisonous'), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce." It added: "These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction."[20...

    The report then detailed 70 shipments (including Bacillus anthracis) from the United States to Iraqi government agencies over three years, concluding "It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States were identical to those the UN inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program."[21]&quo...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..._support_for_Iraq_duri...


     Reply
  • commenter
    jmmx
    Sep 14 04:17 AM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    Reagan

    That is exactly the point. WHY should we have supported a dictator who unilaterally & unprovoked invaded another country??? THAT WAS WRONG. Not only wrong - it was IMMORAL! We should have condemned the invasion that ultimately caused the deaths of half a million people.

    The Republicans continually make very bad geo-political decisions and these decisions come back later to haunt us. The Taliban were NEVEER freedom-fighters. But the Reagan administration blindly ignored common sense and supported them. Now look at the mess we have to clean up. Same with Iraq.

    Like I said - republicans when faced with facts always resort to name calling. So childish!     Reply
  • commenter
    reagan
    Sep 14 12:40 AM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    No shit, we "tacitly" supported Iraq during their war w/Iran. Who do you think we would support, fool? Talk about "mindless". Please, go away & go push that other empty suit, Obama to other "mindless" twits who believe your drivel..... Reply
  • commenter
    jmmx
    Sep 13 09:23 PM
    Apple Investors: Fasten Your Seatbelts, Put On Helmets [view article]
    Reagan

    Did or did not S Hussein invade Iran in the 80's?
    Is it true or not that the Reagan admin tacitly supported Iraq at this time? (ans: Yes they did)

    These are simple facts that cannot be denied no matter how much you try to hide from them.

    Was there a financial crisis in the S&L industry during the Reagan admin? YES! Did it result ini a multi billion dollar bailout by the US tax-payers? YES IT DID.

    YOU may like giving BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars to corporations to bail them out of messes that they got themselves into while the Republican appointed leaders of the regulatory agencies looked the other way or the industries were irresponsibly de-regulated. But I do NOT and most Americans are not happy with this corporate welfare - this socialism for the socialites.

    The response you right wingers always have to the truth is to try to denigrate the messenger. When you cannot argue against the facts, you pitifully disparage the sources, even when you do not know who the sources are. You just make up silly rationales for ignoring what other people say. This is inherently unpatriotic as you mindlessly turn over you thinking to those who are trying to manipulate you, such as Limbaugh, Savage, and Rove. In lock-step you march blindly forward repeating their mantra-du-jour while the country goes down the tubes.

     Reply
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links: