Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP)
Loading...
Symbols:
CHKP Forum Topics
- All Comments on CHKP
- General Discussion on CHKP
- 25 Undervalued Stocks [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Cash-Rich Non-U.S. Companies Trading in the U.S. [view article]
- Cautions for the Software Sector - Goldman [view article]
- 12 Top Israeli Stocks [view article]
- Lowest P/E Ratios in the Nasdaq 100 [view article]
- Barron's Looks at Tech Sector M&A Candidates [view article]
- Six Israeli Stock Picks from AMIDEX's Cliff Goldstein [view article]
- 5 Software Companies At Risk in This Environment [view article]
- Is Checkpoint a Potential Takeover Target? [view article]
- Israeli Co's at Bargain Basement Prices Could Attract Takeover Sharks [view article]
Recent CHKP Articles
- 25 Undervalued Stocks
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Cash-Rich Non-U.S. Companies Trading in the U.S.
- Cautions for the Software Sector - Goldman
- Lowest P/E Ratios in the Nasdaq 100
- 12 Top Israeli Stocks
- Security Software: Spending Continues for Protecting Stuff
- Six Israeli Stock Picks from AMIDEX's Cliff Goldstein
- Intel Questions, Check Point Answers, GE Misses
- IBM Buys Another Israeli Start-Up
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
5
25 Undervalued Stocks [view article]
I wonder which stocks in the list are the cringe-ful ones? Reply25 Undervalued Stocks [view article]
thanks a lot Reply25 Undervalued Stocks [view article]
that's all very good and well to plonk down a list of stocks, but how about a little bit of in-depth analysis, eh? Replygordon
25 Undervalued Stocks [view article]
any undervalued stock is still subject to naked short selling by the unregulated speculators & hedge funds. so we go to (undervalued)squared.> jack Reply
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
ISV worth a look, good fundamentals, there were spikes on Thursday and Friday despite a bad market. A cup and handle was formed maybe in anticipation of good earnings. ReplyEli Hoffmann
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
PJ568, thanks for your feedback. We largely report adjusted earnings. This is due to the fact that analyst consensus estimates, which are the gauge by which many judge whether a given company has beaten or missed expectations, are formulated based on adjusted earnings. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Many of the numbers referenced above appear to be adjusted and not actual. WB and BSX are two that jumped out as being off. One would expect adequate disclosure from the SA Editor about the numbers being referenced. Constantly reporting and discussing adjusted numbers is a sign of weakness that shouldn't be ignored. ReplySan
Francisco
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
It is amazing that so much of the financial health of the western world hinges on the performance of these public / private entities Fannie and Freddie. I was once a stockholder (liked the dividend), but sold when it became apparent to me a few years ago that I did not understand who the management worked for. If they are a cornerstone of the economy, the performance of their management needs to be judged by a standard of security, not growth of EPS, which drove them away from their government mission toward chasing the returns of sub-prime loans. Then the government wanted them to broaden the size of loans that they would handle. Despite hating a larger role for government, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that they neeed to be publicly owned and directed. Ugh. I can't believe that I said that. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
why pay attention to moody,s? why pay attention to anybody? all have an agenda & its not to put money in your pocket.once you know that selfserving lying & greed is the game you should think for yourself. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
well looks like Moody's go unlished playing the rating game again without foundation or facts and just based on speculation. They need to reinstate triple A ratings on some of the bond insurers that were downgraded unjustifiably ReplyCash-Rich Non-U.S. Companies Trading in the U.S. [view article]
good info-thanx ReplyCash-Rich Non-U.S. Companies Trading in the U.S. [view article]
According to my data source, the last quarter report for TM showed more total liabilities than cash. ReplyFlorida, CFA
Cash-Rich Non-U.S. Companies Trading in the U.S. [view article]
Why doesn't Toyota make your list? ReplyCautions for the Software Sector - Goldman [view article]
An excellent article on option plays....finally someone who isn't just pumping his own website (not going to mention names)..Thanks. ReplyAINSWORTH PE
12 Top Israeli Stocks [view article]
I HAVE BEEN LONG CHKP FOR YEARS. WHILE THE STOCK ITSELF HAS AN INTERESTING HISTORY, IT HAS BEEN ONE OF MY MOST PROFITABLE POSITIONS, ALONG WITH INTC, MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE, BUT NOT PART OF ITS COMMENTS.THE GREAT PROFIT FROM CHKP COMES FROM ITS ABILITY TO OFFER ABOVE AVERAGE OPTIONS PREMIUM FROM THE SELLING OF COVERED CALLS. IF ONE IS ON TOP OF HIS PORTFOLIO POSITIONS, HE CAN ACHIEVE A 14 PERCENT GAIN FROM COVERED CALL OPTIONS PREMIUM. THIS METHOD, USING THE RULE OF 72, DOUBLES HIS POSITION VALUE IN 5 YEARS. THIS HAS BEEN MY EXPERIENCE OVER THE LAST 15 YEARS.
I AM CURRENTLY LOOKING AT OTHER POTENTIAL POSITIONS IN THE ISREAL STOCK MARKET WHICH ARE LISTED IN THE U.S. MARKETS.
FINALLY, THE FACT THAT BUFFETT BOUGHT ISCAR IS IRRELIVENT TO ME. BUFFETT'S (BRK.A OR BRK.B) HAS NO INTEREST TO THIS INVERTOR. HEY DR JOHN "WHY YOU SAY?" THE ANSWER IS VERY SIMPLE.......NO OPTIONS ON BIRKIE'S STOCK.
WHEN COMPARING MY PORTFOLIO TO BRK.A OR BRK.B OVER THE LONG TERM, MY POSITIONS OVERALL, HAVE OUT PERFORMED BUFFETT'S PORTFOLIO. PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE IS MY ONLY CONCERN FROM INVESTMENT POSITIONS.
THANK YOU!
DR JOHN AINSWORTH PE Reply