<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DMC - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'DMC' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc</link>
    <item>
      <title>Closing Update: Stocks Manage Narrowly Higher Finish</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/161445-closing-update-stocks-manage-narrowly-higher-finish?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">161445</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Sep 14, 2009 </em></p><ul><li>NYSE up 36.2 (0.5%) to 6,879.98.</li><li>DJIA up 21 (0.2%) to 9,627.</li><li>S&amp;P 500 up 6.6 (0.6%) to 1,049.</li><li>Nasdaq up 11 (0.5%) to 2,092.</li></ul><p><br><strong>GLOBAL SENTIMENT  </strong></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:21:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>MidnightTrader.com</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://blog.midnighttrader.com/'>Brooks McFeely</a> submits:</strong><p><em>Sep 14, 2009 </em></p><ul><li>NYSE up 36.2 (0.5%) to 6,879.98.</li><li>DJIA up 21 (0.2%) to 9,627.</li><li>S&amp;P 500 up 6.6 (0.6%) to 1,049.</li><li>Nasdaq up 11 (0.5%) to 2,092.</li></ul><p><br><strong>GLOBAL SENTIMENT  </strong></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/161445-closing-update-stocks-manage-narrowly-higher-finish?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/alxa">ALXA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aria">ARIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cors">CORS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/crnt">CRNT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cvx">CVX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cwtr">CWTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dal">DAL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dt">DT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/etfc">ETFC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gnbt">GNBT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gt">GT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hstx">HSTX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj">JNJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lvs">LVS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mos">MOS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pot">POT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/s">S</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sgp">SGP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/slxp">SLXP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/thc">THC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/midnight-trader">MidnightTrader.com</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: Running Out of Time</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/91279-document-security-systems-running-out-of-time?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">91279</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Document Security Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>), a company built on overly-promotional deals and an unblemished history of financial failure, has recently announced several new operational initiatives as well as their second quarter 2008 results.</p><p>Unfortunately for shareholders, these appear to be the last gasps of a company whose days are limited.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:41:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Hanratty</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Carl Hanratty submits:</strong><p>Document Security Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>), a company built on overly-promotional deals and an unblemished history of financial failure, has recently announced several new operational initiatives as well as their second quarter 2008 results.</p><p>Unfortunately for shareholders, these appear to be the last gasps of a company whose days are limited.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/91279-document-security-systems-running-out-of-time?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-hanratty">Carl Hanratty</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: New Chairman Has Troubling History</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/62942-document-security-systems-new-chairman-has-troubling-history?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62942</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</p>
</strong></em>
<p>On
Thursday January 24, Document Security Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>)
announced that they had elected Robert Fagenson to Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Lead Independent Director. This announcement comes shortly after
the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420408000876/v098963_8k.htm">January
1st filing</a> that Robert Fagenson’s company, Fagenson and Co, Inc., had entered
into an agreement to lend DMC up
to $3 million, with DMC agreeing
to pledge their P3 Plastic Printing Professionals subsidiary as collateral. </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:58:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Hanratty</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Carl Hanratty submits:</strong><p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</p>
</strong></em>
<p>On
Thursday January 24, Document Security Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>)
announced that they had elected Robert Fagenson to Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Lead Independent Director. This announcement comes shortly after
the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420408000876/v098963_8k.htm">January
1st filing</a> that Robert Fagenson’s company, Fagenson and Co, Inc., had entered
into an agreement to lend DMC up
to $3 million, with DMC agreeing
to pledge their P3 Plastic Printing Professionals subsidiary as collateral. </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/62942-document-security-systems-new-chairman-has-troubling-history?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-hanratty">Carl Hanratty</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: Run From DMC</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/66601-document-security-systems-run-from-dmc?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[
<p>
<p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</p>
</strong></em>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:55:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Hanratty</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Carl Hanratty submits:</strong>
<p>
<p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</p>
</strong></em>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/66601-document-security-systems-run-from-dmc?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-hanratty">Carl Hanratty</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: No Long Term Value, Plenty of Red Flags </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/67076-document-security-systems-no-long-term-value-plenty-of-red-flags?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67076</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</strong></em></p>
<div class="hide"><div>
<p>In the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/66601-document-security-systems-run-from-dmc">initial write-up</a> of a company called Document Security 
Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>), a number of concerns were outlined. This previous 
write-up barely scratched the surface of the operational issues at play. 
What follows is a full report that completely exposes all the details 
concerning DMC’s over-hyped technology, suspicious business arrangements, 
dilutive share offerings, and its lawsuit against the European Central 
Bank.   </p></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Carl Hanratty</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>Carl Hanratty submits:</strong><p><em><strong>Editor's note: Some positions presented in this article have been disputed. See <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/70196-seeking-alpha-policy-for-disputing-an-article">Seeking Alpha Policy for Disputing an Article</a>.</strong></em></p>
<div class="hide"><div>
<p>In the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/66601-document-security-systems-run-from-dmc">initial write-up</a> of a company called Document Security 
Systems (AMEX:<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>), a number of concerns were outlined. This previous 
write-up barely scratched the surface of the operational issues at play. 
What follows is a full report that completely exposes all the details 
concerning DMC’s over-hyped technology, suspicious business arrangements, 
dilutive share offerings, and its lawsuit against the European Central 
Bank.   </p></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/67076-document-security-systems-no-long-term-value-plenty-of-red-flags?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/carl-hanratty">Carl Hanratty</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: Nothing But a Patent Troll</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/45256-document-security-systems-nothing-but-a-patent-troll?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45256</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[: Document Security Systems, Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>)  (market cap: $148.9M),  has no significant assets besides a few patents and a lawsuit against the European Central Bank alleging copyright infringement for certain of the Euro bill's security features (such as water marks). In this report I briefly highlight the company's financial data and discuss the current state of DMC's court battles. I also criticize the one analyst who follows the company and who recently reiterated his <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070820/0292660.html">buy recommendation</a>.

<p>DMC is a company without a decent product, without any significant assets (tangible or intangible), without any hope of ever making any sales significant enough to justify its current market cap. While the company has doubled its revenues over the last year ($1.75 million in Q1 2007, vs. $0.86 million in Q1 2006), about half of that increase has come ! from acquisitions ($215k from 2006 acquisition of P3) and from growth in the acquired companies (approximately $200k in sales growth in P3, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407025669/v075256.htm">see p.17 of the 10Q for details</a>). Also, for an intellectual property company, Document Security Systems spends very little on R&D: $109k in the most recent quarter (see the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407041613/v083694_ex99-1.htm">August 9, 2007 press release</a>). Net loss was $2.9 million in the most recent quarter (Q2, ended June 30). As for sales, they were up 10% in Q2 2007 versus Q2 2006. Not bad. But again, the company did make some acquisitions in that time. Oh, and share count was up 6% in the same period of time.
</p>
<p>DMC's one asset is a patent (actually, a few related patents) on a document security system that prevents documents from being digitally scanned or copied. The one problem is that the patent was ruled invalid in the United States in 2000 and was ruled invalid in <a href="http://www.asensio.com/data/press/282.pdf">Britain</a> and <a href="http://www.asensio.com/data/press/283.pdf">WIPO</a> just this spring (the company has filed appeals). The company is of course appealing the recent rulings in Europe, but the case against them seems to me to be pretty strong. Also, if the company loses its appeals in Europe, it will not only have its patents invalidated but it will be liable for the court costs of the European Central Bank (which is trying to have the patents ruled invalid). The company did win an identical case in <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407014737/v069558_ex99-1.htm">Germany</a>, but it is unclear what would happen if the company won cases in some countries but not others. For a brief synopsis, I suggest reading Asensio.com's <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=789&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+I!
<br />
 nc.&#38;IsArchived=true">report</a> (Asensio.com is an independent short-selling research outfit). I also suggest reading Asensio's <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=716&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+Inc.&#38;IsArchived=true">prior</a> <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=717&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+Inc.&#38;IsArchived=true">reports</a> on DMC. You can see DMC&#8217;s European patent <a href="http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&#38;IDX=EP0455750&#38;F=1&#38;QPN=EP0455750">online</a>. I have uploaded a pdf copy of the patent <a href="http://www.goodevalue.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ep0455750a1.pdf">here</a>.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:56:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Goode</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/michaelgoode.jpg' title='michael goode' alt='michael goode' width="75" height="88" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" border='1' /><strong><a href="http://www.goodevalue.com">Michael Goode</a> submits:</strong>: Document Security Systems, Inc. (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>)  (market cap: $148.9M),  has no significant assets besides a few patents and a lawsuit against the European Central Bank alleging copyright infringement for certain of the Euro bill's security features (such as water marks). In this report I briefly highlight the company's financial data and discuss the current state of DMC's court battles. I also criticize the one analyst who follows the company and who recently reiterated his <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070820/0292660.html">buy recommendation</a>.

<p>DMC is a company without a decent product, without any significant assets (tangible or intangible), without any hope of ever making any sales significant enough to justify its current market cap. While the company has doubled its revenues over the last year ($1.75 million in Q1 2007, vs. $0.86 million in Q1 2006), about half of that increase has come ! from acquisitions ($215k from 2006 acquisition of P3) and from growth in the acquired companies (approximately $200k in sales growth in P3, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407025669/v075256.htm">see p.17 of the 10Q for details</a>). Also, for an intellectual property company, Document Security Systems spends very little on R&D: $109k in the most recent quarter (see the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407041613/v083694_ex99-1.htm">August 9, 2007 press release</a>). Net loss was $2.9 million in the most recent quarter (Q2, ended June 30). As for sales, they were up 10% in Q2 2007 versus Q2 2006. Not bad. But again, the company did make some acquisitions in that time. Oh, and share count was up 6% in the same period of time.
</p>
<p>DMC's one asset is a patent (actually, a few related patents) on a document security system that prevents documents from being digitally scanned or copied. The one problem is that the patent was ruled invalid in the United States in 2000 and was ruled invalid in <a href="http://www.asensio.com/data/press/282.pdf">Britain</a> and <a href="http://www.asensio.com/data/press/283.pdf">WIPO</a> just this spring (the company has filed appeals). The company is of course appealing the recent rulings in Europe, but the case against them seems to me to be pretty strong. Also, if the company loses its appeals in Europe, it will not only have its patents invalidated but it will be liable for the court costs of the European Central Bank (which is trying to have the patents ruled invalid). The company did win an identical case in <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771999/000114420407014737/v069558_ex99-1.htm">Germany</a>, but it is unclear what would happen if the company won cases in some countries but not others. For a brief synopsis, I suggest reading Asensio.com's <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=789&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+I!
<br />
 nc.&#38;IsArchived=true">report</a> (Asensio.com is an independent short-selling research outfit). I also suggest reading Asensio's <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=716&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+Inc.&#38;IsArchived=true">prior</a> <a href="http://www.asensio.com/Reports/ReportView.aspx?ReportId=717&#38;CompanyId=151&#38;CompanyName=Document+Security+Systems%2c+Inc.&#38;IsArchived=true">reports</a> on DMC. You can see DMC&#8217;s European patent <a href="http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&#38;IDX=EP0455750&#38;F=1&#38;QPN=EP0455750">online</a>. I have uploaded a pdf copy of the patent <a href="http://www.goodevalue.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ep0455750a1.pdf">here</a>.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/45256-document-security-systems-nothing-but-a-patent-troll?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/michael-goode">Michael Goode</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Document Security Systems: Schizophrenic Signals Not a Good Sign</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/30949-document-security-systems-schizophrenic-signals-not-a-good-sign?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30949</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Document Security Systems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>) has taken a few punches in the head on the intellectual property front. The Rochester New York based company develops anti-counterfeiting products. Specifically, the company's technologies protect documents and printed products including currency, ID cards, passports and gift certificates from counterfeiters and identity thieves. Should be a big business.

<p>But they have just lost a patent validity lawsuit in the UK and the International Bureau of World International Property Organization’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wipo' title='More opinion and analysis of WIPO'>WIPO</a>) March 13, 2007 denied DMC's European patent. (DMC has been silent to date about the WIPO ruling).
</p>
<p>The company was quick to point out that each European country would decide for itself. On March 27 we hear that the German Federal Patent Court approved the validity. It is believed that several other jurisdictions are grinding their way to decisions.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:56:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>George Gutowski</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/georgegutow.jpg' align="left" border="1" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong><a href="http://financialskeptic.blogspot.com/">George Gutowski</a> submits: </strong>Document Security Systems (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc' title='More opinion and analysis of DMC'>DMC</a>) has taken a few punches in the head on the intellectual property front. The Rochester New York based company develops anti-counterfeiting products. Specifically, the company's technologies protect documents and printed products including currency, ID cards, passports and gift certificates from counterfeiters and identity thieves. Should be a big business.

<p>But they have just lost a patent validity lawsuit in the UK and the International Bureau of World International Property Organization’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wipo' title='More opinion and analysis of WIPO'>WIPO</a>) March 13, 2007 denied DMC's European patent. (DMC has been silent to date about the WIPO ruling).
</p>
<p>The company was quick to point out that each European country would decide for itself. On March 27 we hear that the German Federal Patent Court approved the validity. It is believed that several other jurisdictions are grinding their way to decisions.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/30949-document-security-systems-schizophrenic-signals-not-a-good-sign?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dmc">DMC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/george-gutowski">George Gutowski</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
