Denison Mines Corp (DNN)
Loading...
Symbols:
DNN Forum Topics
- All Comments on DNN
- General Discussion on DNN
- Nuclear Power's Second Coming Will Lead to a Uranium Boom [view article]
- Commodities: Brief Correction or Bursting Bubble? [view article]
- A Nuclear Growth Opportunity with Denison Mines [view article]
- Eastern Platinum and First Uranium Top Raymond James' Favorites List [view article]
- Seven Uranium Stocks to Fuel Your Portfolio [view article]
- Denison Mines: A Play on Escalating Uranium Demand [view article]
- Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
- Keeping Metals In May, Not Going Away [view article]
- Denison Mines’ U.S. Uranium Mill Monopoly [view article]
- Uranium: Red Hot Yellow Cake [view article]
- Uranium on the Rise [view article]
loading ...Recent DNN Articles
- A Nuclear Growth Opportunity with Denison Mines
- Commodities: Brief Correction or Bursting Bubble?
- Eastern Platinum and First Uranium Top Raymond James' Favorites List
- Nuclear Power's Second Coming Will Lead to a Uranium Boom
- Denison Mines: A Play on Escalating Uranium Demand
- Keeping Metals In May, Not Going Away
- Seven Uranium Stocks to Fuel Your Portfolio
- Uranium: Red Hot Yellow Cake
- Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future
- Time for Nuclear Energy and Uranium Stocks to Shine?
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
Sorry if I hurt your feelings, nothing personal. But politics and energy production are inexorably intertwined. I wasn't the one who vetoed ANWR ten years ago and cost our economy a million gallons of new gasoline per day. And I didn't produce the movie that negatively sensationalized the use of nuclear energy. Nor did I adopt legislation that mandated burning food in automobiles. But that doesn't mean I have to blindly support such foolhardy ideas, either. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to work so that I can afford the resulting inflated prices of gas and groceries. ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
paulk: "Must've hit a liberal nerve there."No, you hit a "partisan lemming posting useless rhetoric on an investment board" nerve.
And now the best you can do is ask "what about solar"? Please leave and don't come back until you have something substantive to offer. The fading hope for SeekingAlpha was that it would be a place for intelligent discourse on investments. Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
Must've hit a liberal nerve there. Getting a little touchy as gas is approaching $4.00 a gallon, are we...? Well, just wait! If all the hot air coming out of Washington could power our energy needs, none of this would be an issue.Seriously, though, since solar and wind currently account for about 1% of our electricity production, more oil, natural gas, and nuclear power appear to be the only practical alternatives to our immediate economic survival. Unless someone has a better idea...? Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
india, where i live, has an abundance of thorium. the commies here are fighting tooth and nail the nuclear deal we have on the table with the US... which could be our magical key to unlock the power my country oh so desperately needs!!! ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
hey fxtrader07, this makes the case for thorium so much stronger, right? thorium, as stillafewleft says, is much safer, abundantly available, cheap as hell. i wonder why all discussion of nuclear power begins and ends with uranium.Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
hey fxtrader07, this makes the case for thorium so much stronger, right? thorium, as stillafewleft says, is much safer, abundantly available, cheap as hell. i wonder why all discussion of nuclear power begins and ends with uranium.Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
You all should consider giving fxtrader a break... he's coversant in at least one more language than I am. If he's living in France, though, he should think about the source of the electricity that's powering his laptop... odds are it's nuclear! ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
paulk8756: "The D's in Washington are so removed from reality that our only hope for our immediate energy future is a resurgence of "red state" sanity."Please take your partisan rhetoric off of seekingAlpha and to the Yahoo message boards where it belongs. Lemming. Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
The D's in Washington are so removed from reality that our only hope for our immediate energy future is a resurgence of "red state" sanity. How and when that will come is uncertain but, just like the economic rules governing supply and demand, it will happen eventually.Speaking of which, here's a WONDEREFUL irony for you... the D senator from N. Dakota, who routinely votes against ANWR and every other practical measure to increase our nation's energy supplies, is waxing ecstatic that the oil in the Bakken fields in his home state is finally economic.
(Of course, the downside to this is we must be even bigger idiots than he is to have put these clowns in power...sigh!)
Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
So fxtrader is willing to gamble that a tiny minority of scientists might be right and we should therefore burn fossil fuels with abandon. We will keep our fingers crossed that the increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere (not seen on earth in the last million years) will have no effect.While I won't get into an argue with you and your "credible" scientists, you overlook a very simple issue - we must have nuclear power. The price of oil is skyrocketing, ditto for coal and all other dirty sources of energy. Oil production has effectively plateaued and will start to decline in the next 5-10 years.
We need ever more terawatts of power and we're not going to get it from coal/oil/gas. Only U has the energy density and supply to power us for another 50-100 years while we diligently work on new energy sources and conservation.
Yes, I wish I could plug my house into a tree but I can't. Nobody particularly wants nuclear power but it is a reality that must be embraced.
"any outbreak of a larger mud vulcano somewhere in the ocean will kill ALL CO2 reduction effects achieved with hundreds of billions of wasted money"
Facile and erroneous. Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
@bluesmoke: sorry for the typos. and then, not everyone in the world is a native english speaker. you got my points very well. if you prefer to focus on form rather than substance - it's your choice. ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
@iscarethebear: you are long claims and short facts. you need not to tell me that france recycles part of the uranium. i live over here. It does NOT solve the storage problem. there are huge facilities built in germany inold mines but the problem is: nobody knows how the area will look like, from a geotectonic point of view even 200 years from now, not to speak of 5000!. then we have NO material that will last even for a mere 200 years to contain the radiating waste! so at best you have to "repack" the stuff every 200 years. pretty expensive over aperiod of 5000-10000 years i might say.I have my facts straight, don't worry. I was once a die-hard adherent to the theory of global warming by human CO2 emissions and used to harop at people who questioned it, i urged everyone to do something against these emissions ( i am still for doing something against them, btw). Hoiwever, I started educating myself listening to the arguments of exceptional scientists who are getting silenced these days by the mob very much like the ecologists got silenced in the 80s (what an irony). Human action has a negligiböe effect on global warming and in fact, we are just coming off a cool period in Earth's history. a few million years back ethere were similiar periods of global warming and cooling. I guess, responsible for these were the cavemen breathing too much, no? Reply
Uranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
If fxtrader07 used proper grammar, spelled words correctly, and learned how to construct a coherent sentence, then there's a chance others would at least consider his comments with some measure of objectivity. ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
CCJ is up 10% in the past 5 days ReplyUranium: Safely and Efficiently Powering the Future [view article]
Fstrader07 clearly does not deal in facts as many people do when fighting a losing battle. I suggest that you look at the actual data and use your higher brain. For one I choose to have power. Second there is plenty of uranium in the world. Have you looked at the way France recycles their spent metal? For the record, my weekend home that I built in 1997 is off grid. I am well versed in alternative energy. Only nuclear power can supply our great energy demands at this time.Regards,
Scarethebear Reply