FedEx Corporation (FDX)
Loading...
Symbols:
FDX Forum Topics
- All Comments on FDX
- General Discussion on FDX
- Bail-out Buys - Fast Money Recap (10/1/08) [view article]
- Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
- FedEx: A Proxy for the Economy? [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- When Energy Goes Lower - Fast Money Recap (9/10/08) [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Lehman Hangover - Fast Money Recap (9/9/08) [view article]
- Options Trader: Which Way Wednesday? [view article]
- No Relationship To Reality - Cramer's Mad Money (9/10/08) [view article]
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08) [view article]
- Railway Stocks Haul Transportation ETF to Solid Returns [view article]
- FedEx: Same Stock, Same Put Spread [view article]
loading ...Recent FDX Articles
- Bail-out Buys - Fast Money Recap (10/1/08)
- FedEx: A Proxy for the Economy?
- Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Fedex Q3 EPS Guidance: Not Enough on the Table
- When Energy Goes Lower - Fast Money Recap (9/10/08)
- Options Trader: Which Way Wednesday?
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Lehman Hangover - Fast Money Recap (9/9/08)
- Railway Stocks Haul Transportation ETF to Solid Returns
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Bail-out Buys - Fast Money Recap (10/1/08) [view article]
Markets are still far too high with a recession coming down the tracks at some speed. Buffett gets amazing deals not available to us. Keep your cash on deposit and don't get tempted by the sirens of Wall Street whose big crash is still coming, see:arabianmoney.net/2008/.../ Reply
strom.com
Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
In regards to CCL I see some trading possibilities and a very long term buy assuming they can manage to market the high end berth capicity comin online. www.ryanwahlstrom.com/... ReplyBail-out Buys - Fast Money Recap (10/1/08) [view article]
100 billion added to the 700 billion dollar ReplyBail-out Buys - Fast Money Recap (10/1/08) [view article]
did the senators add other 100 billion to the bill ReplyFedEx: A Proxy for the Economy? [view article]
I wouldn't invest a dime in this company, I work there so I should know. They are squeezing the workers to work faster because of reconfiguration of traffic lanes. It has put us in a critical time box on meeting outbound service times. They have a quarterly goal oriented pay out that the management keeps adding stuff to making it harder to achieve the maximum payout. My job used to be fun but not anymore. I am a driver to is forced to work the dock and I am sick to death of it. If the pay wasn't so good I would quit even after 15yrs. ReplyFedEx: A Proxy for the Economy? [view article]
I've heard for the last couple of years that FedEx is a proxy for the economy (as I have about GE).... The most recent airing of this view was Guy Adami on Fast Money about 2 months ago.... Seems to me the market has already pegged them as a bellweather. Maybe they just recognize that perception and are wording their reports to accommodate investor's perception. I can't figure out why any company would actively pursue this particular spot. It seems to me that it would just make your stock price swing more erratically than normal.jegan ;-) Reply
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
I have a few naked puts on....NEM,,,HL...GOLD MINING STOCKS and will be put to, but I love it. What a dilemma to be in,,,,having to sell me gold stocks and watching it rise over $80 in one day. Having to buy Newmont Mining at 45 and then watch go back up to over $1,000 per oz will really be fun to watch, as who is protecting the almighty dollar? ReplyDaily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
Beetle, and there isn't a 'bailout' called tax deductions for corporations? Why not treat both individuals and financial companies the same? ReplyLieberman
Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
Makes no sense. They think that they can clear the decks for the financial industry... It may make some money for some traders for the short term...This will not trickle down for the average Joe and that will be what will bring the economy to it's knees. The average Joe is losing their shirts...and the government knows it.The govt is shoring up treasuries because if there is a run on in them we are scr*wed... It may happen... Reply
Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
there is a bailout for stock losses ................its called a tax deductionOn Sep 19 12:42 PM bowman711 wrote:
> My question is, why would all the money governments around the world
> can print encourage prudent lending? I can see how it might encourage
> reckless lending because the lender can 'bank' on the government
> to bail him out when the loans go bad. But, how does reckless lending
> (even if there happen to be some wise loans as well) solve the financial
> crisis problem?
>
> I think most would agree that one learns more, and makes greater
> improvements to one stock trading, from losing trades than from profitable
> trades. Where would you be today if the government bailed you out
> every time you had a losing trade? Would you put the same care and
> analysis to your trades if you knew a bailout would be there if it
> went bad?
>
> Similarly, how does it really improve the financial condition of
> these banks and investment banks when they can now count on a bailout
> for their bad investments? On top of that, there will be essentially
> the same executives making investment decision now as there were
> before this 'Mother of all Bailouts.' So, it seems to me we have
> the same incompetent executives making investment/loan decisions;
> only now they are assured of a rescue for their losses.
>
> What the Government is doing today regarding the 'Mother of all Bailouts'
> may delay the real improvements needed in the wisom and prudence
> of the financial executives, but it doesn't address them. It seems
> to me that it would be far better for the government to cover the
> losses of million investers (whether directly as a trader, or indirectly,
> as owner of a mutual fund, pension fund, etc.) and let the reckless
> executives and ther financial firms they run get what they deserve.
>
>
> It simply does not make sense to me for the Government to cover the
> recklessness of the wealthiest slice of our society, and let the
> regular people, voters, take their losses on their own. Reply
Daily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
My question is, why would all the money governments around the world can print encourage prudent lending? I can see how it might encourage reckless lending because the lender can 'bank' on the government to bail him out when the loans go bad. But, how does reckless lending (even if there happen to be some wise loans as well) solve the financial crisis problem?I think most would agree that one learns more, and makes greater improvements to one stock trading, from losing trades than from profitable trades. Where would you be today if the government bailed you out every time you had a losing trade? Would you put the same care and analysis to your trades if you knew a bailout would be there if it went bad?
Similarly, how does it really improve the financial condition of these banks and investment banks when they can now count on a bailout for their bad investments? On top of that, there will be essentially the same executives making investment decision now as there were before this 'Mother of all Bailouts.' So, it seems to me we have the same incompetent executives making investment/loan decisions; only now they are assured of a rescue for their losses.
What the Government is doing today regarding the 'Mother of all Bailouts' may delay the real improvements needed in the wisom and prudence of the financial executives, but it doesn't address them. It seems to me that it would be far better for the government to cover the losses of million investers (whether directly as a trader, or indirectly, as owner of a mutual fund, pension fund, etc.) and let the reckless executives and ther financial firms they run get what they deserve.
It simply does not make sense to me for the Government to cover the recklessness of the wealthiest slice of our society, and let the regular people, voters, take their losses on their own. Reply
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
HOMEbuilding includes apartments and condos.Around here they are filled/bought as fast as they are built,and they are going up ALL OVER the place around here. ReplyDaily Market Outlook: Early Indications Are for a Modest Rebound [view article]
It appears policymakers including the fed are inclined to watch and wait. They will step in when they feel that absolutely have to but otherwise they'll remain on the sidelines.In my opinion this almost guarantees a further 20% drop in the S&P from the old lows. The rate of bad news will begin to slow, but with a lack of good news to drive the market, it will slow it's decent before rebounding in a huge way.
That's the tough part, you shouldn't try and pick a bottom but waiting for a pop is going to cost you huge when the pop has all of this current liquidity behind it. It's tough out there. Reply
San
Francisco
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
Why are we building any houses? This bubble shouldn't work itself out until the number of people who can afford a house grows to fill the inventory. Perhaps there is some migration from one region to another, but that's it. ReplyWall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
sorry i meant since oct 08 Reply