<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>FGROF.PK - News and Analysis from Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>&#169; seekingalpha.com. Use of this feed is limited to personal, non-commercial use and is governed by Seeking Alpha's Terms of Use (http://seekingalpha.com/page/terms-of-use). Publishing this feed for public or commercial use and/or misrepresentation by a third party is prohibited.</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk</link>
    <item>
      <title>School Bus Operators: Big Yellow Buses, Big Green Yields</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/547561-school-bus-operators-big-yellow-buses-big-green-yields?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">547561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>We began analyzing <strong>Student Transportation</strong>'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stb' title='Student Transportation Inc'>STB</a>) common stock back in August when we were alerted to the fact that <a href="http://www.stnonline.com/home/press-releases/3597-student-transportation-inc-approved-for-us-listing-on-nasdaq" rel="nofollow">it received approval to register its shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market</a> and that it was paying a nearly 8.9% dividend yield. Though we <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/468751-student-transportation-increase-in-fair-value-but-still-overvalued">are currently rating</a> STB as an underperforming 'Avoid' and we have expressed our opinion about STB's dividend policy in relation to its capital expenditures and acquisition program, we are intrigued by the fact that STB and its two largest competitors <strong>Firstgroup PLC</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk' title='Firstgroup Plc'>FGROF.PK</a>) and <strong>National Express</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nxpgy.pk' title='National Express Adr'>NXPGY.PK</a>) offer above average dividend yields to shareholders.</p><p>Student Transportation is the third largest provider of school business transportation services in North America. The company operates in two segments, school bus transportation (98.5% of revenues) and an oil &amp; gas portfolio (1.5% of revenues). The company operates buses in Ontario Canada and 13 states in the U.S., mostly in the</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:37:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Saibus Research</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://saibusresearch.com/'>Saibus Research</a>:</strong><p>We began analyzing <strong>Student Transportation</strong>'s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stb' title='Student Transportation Inc'>STB</a>) common stock back in August when we were alerted to the fact that <a href="http://www.stnonline.com/home/press-releases/3597-student-transportation-inc-approved-for-us-listing-on-nasdaq" rel="nofollow">it received approval to register its shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market</a> and that it was paying a nearly 8.9% dividend yield. Though we <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/468751-student-transportation-increase-in-fair-value-but-still-overvalued">are currently rating</a> STB as an underperforming 'Avoid' and we have expressed our opinion about STB's dividend policy in relation to its capital expenditures and acquisition program, we are intrigued by the fact that STB and its two largest competitors <strong>Firstgroup PLC</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk' title='Firstgroup Plc'>FGROF.PK</a>) and <strong>National Express</strong> (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nxpgy.pk' title='National Express Adr'>NXPGY.PK</a>) offer above average dividend yields to shareholders.</p><p>Student Transportation is the third largest provider of school business transportation services in North America. The company operates in two segments, school bus transportation (98.5% of revenues) and an oil &amp; gas portfolio (1.5% of revenues). The company operates buses in Ontario Canada and 13 states in the U.S., mostly in the</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/547561-school-bus-operators-big-yellow-buses-big-green-yields?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk">FGROF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nxpgy.pk">NXPGY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stb">STB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/saibus-research">Saibus Research</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Peak Oil Investments: 9 Mass Transit Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/213679-the-best-peak-oil-investments-9-mass-transit-stocks?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">213679</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Americans are notoriously attached to their cars, but high oil prices in 2007 and 2008 led many to get on a bus or train.  According to a 2009 paper <a href="http://www.transportchicago.org/images/3-Transit_Ridership_Models.pdf" rel="nofollow"><i>Transit Ridership Models: </i><i>Present Status and Future Needs</i> [pdf]</a> by Grace Galluci and John D Allen, Ph.D. from Chicago's Regional Transportation Authority, current published transit ridership models do not yet incorporate changes in gasoline prices.  The authors consider this a serious omission, since, in addition to the obvious intuitive link between gas prices and ridership, they found a strong correlation between gas prices and transit ridership using CRTA ridership data and local gasoline prices.  The following chart comes from this paper, and shows ridership following the local gas price (with a slight lag.)<br/><br/><br/><br/><strong>Gas Price and Transit Profits</strong><br/><br/> Although it may be safe to assume that transit ridership will increase with rising gas prices, a higher gas price may not make</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:32:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tom Konrad</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TomKonrad.jpg' title='tom konrad' alt='tom konrad' width="75" height="82" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>By  Tom Konrad (<a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/">AltEnergyStocks</a>): </strong><p>Americans are notoriously attached to their cars, but high oil prices in 2007 and 2008 led many to get on a bus or train.  According to a 2009 paper <a href="http://www.transportchicago.org/images/3-Transit_Ridership_Models.pdf" rel="nofollow"><i>Transit Ridership Models: </i><i>Present Status and Future Needs</i> [pdf]</a> by Grace Galluci and John D Allen, Ph.D. from Chicago's Regional Transportation Authority, current published transit ridership models do not yet incorporate changes in gasoline prices.  The authors consider this a serious omission, since, in addition to the obvious intuitive link between gas prices and ridership, they found a strong correlation between gas prices and transit ridership using CRTA ridership data and local gasoline prices.  The following chart comes from this paper, and shows ridership following the local gas price (with a slight lag.)<br/><br/><br/><br/><strong>Gas Price and Transit Profits</strong><br/><br/> Although it may be safe to assume that transit ridership will increase with rising gas prices, a higher gas price may not make</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/213679-the-best-peak-oil-investments-9-mass-transit-stocks?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aomff.pk">AOMFF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bdrbf.pk">BDRBF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nfyif.pk">NFYIF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vossf.pk">VOSSF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk">FGROF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cub">CUB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fstr">FSTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prpx">PRPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wab">WAB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/tom-konrad">Tom Konrad</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Report from Europe: Stocks Suffers as China Hints at Tightening</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/181497-report-from-europe-stocks-suffers-as-china-hints-at-tightening?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">181497</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><p>US stocks rose as higher energy and metal prices lifted commodity producers and some Federal Reserve policy makers said they would consider<span> more stimulus measures, overshadowing declines in technology and telephone shares. Baker Hughes (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bhi' title='Baker Hughes Inc.'>BHI</a>) and Freeport-McMoRan Copper &amp; Gold (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fcx' title='Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.'>FCX</a>) rallied at least 4% as freezing weather boosted energy prices and threatened to disrupt metals production. Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) and Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) climbed 1%-plus as minutes from the Fed’s last meeting showed central bankers debated an increase in asset purchases if the economy weakens and gave no sign they plan to lift interest rates anytime soon.</span></p> <p>In brief, stocks on the move today. Tate &amp; Lyle slumped 6.7%, the biggest intraday drop since May after Credit Suisse cut the shares to “neutral” from “outperform. Continental jumped 8.8% on news a group of banks led by Deutsche Bank (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/db' title='Deutsche Bank AG'>DB</a>), Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'>GS</a>) and JPMorgan Chase (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='JPMorgan Chase & Co.'>JPM</a>) had agreed to</p></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:08:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>The Mole</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.paddypowertrader.com/blog/index.php/category/market-watch/'>The Mole</a>: </strong><div><p>US stocks rose as higher energy and metal prices lifted commodity producers and some Federal Reserve policy makers said they would consider<span> more stimulus measures, overshadowing declines in technology and telephone shares. Baker Hughes (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bhi' title='Baker Hughes Inc.'>BHI</a>) and Freeport-McMoRan Copper &amp; Gold (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fcx' title='Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.'>FCX</a>) rallied at least 4% as freezing weather boosted energy prices and threatened to disrupt metals production. Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) and Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) climbed 1%-plus as minutes from the Fed’s last meeting showed central bankers debated an increase in asset purchases if the economy weakens and gave no sign they plan to lift interest rates anytime soon.</span></p> <p>In brief, stocks on the move today. Tate &amp; Lyle slumped 6.7%, the biggest intraday drop since May after Credit Suisse cut the shares to “neutral” from “outperform. Continental jumped 8.8% on news a group of banks led by Deutsche Bank (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/db' title='Deutsche Bank AG'>DB</a>), Goldman Sachs (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gs' title='Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'>GS</a>) and JPMorgan Chase (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jpm' title='JPMorgan Chase & Co.'>JPM</a>) had agreed to</p></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/181497-report-from-europe-stocks-suffers-as-china-hints-at-tightening?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqq">QQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/woscf.pk">WOSCF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jsaiy.pk">JSAIY.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk">FGROF.PK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/the-mole">The Mole</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Clean Energy Stocks for 2010</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/180084-10-clean-energy-stocks-for-2010?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">180084</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <b>A mini-portfolio of stocks that not only are green, but should outperform the market in an environment of increasing concern about climate change and peak oil.</b>
</p> <p>This is the third annual list of green stocks I have published.  In 2008, it was a <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/01/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_geothermal_wind_and_wave_and_thin_film_hype.html" rel="nofollow">list of ten</a> <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2007/12/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_batteries_chp_and_transmission.html" rel="nofollow">speculative alternative</a> <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2007/12/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_leds_and_ultracaps_1.html" rel="nofollow">energy companies</a> (in three parts) that I thought might catch public notice that year.  As we all now know, 2008 was a horrible year for speculative stocks, and my stocks were no exception, <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/update_ten_speculations_for_2008.html" rel="nofollow">losing an average of 55% that year</a>, although that still ended up being better than <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/clean_energy_mutual_funds_and_etfs_does_active_management_pay_1.html" rel="nofollow">seven out of nine of the sector mutual funds and ETFs that I was then tracking</a>.</p> <p>In 2009, my <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/ten_for_2009.html" rel="nofollow">ten green stock picks were more conservative</a>, with a focus on profitable companies with good cash flow.  The results have been better than I hoped.  These <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/in_review_10_clean_energy_stocks_for_2009.html" rel="nofollow"> 10 picks gained an average of 57%</a>, beating my</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Tom Konrad</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TomKonrad.jpg' title='tom konrad' alt='tom konrad' width="75" height="82" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>By  Tom Konrad (<a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/">AltEnergyStocks</a>): </strong><p>
  <b>A mini-portfolio of stocks that not only are green, but should outperform the market in an environment of increasing concern about climate change and peak oil.</b>
</p> <p>This is the third annual list of green stocks I have published.  In 2008, it was a <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/01/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_geothermal_wind_and_wave_and_thin_film_hype.html" rel="nofollow">list of ten</a> <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2007/12/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_batteries_chp_and_transmission.html" rel="nofollow">speculative alternative</a> <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2007/12/ten_alternative_energy_speculations_for_2008_leds_and_ultracaps_1.html" rel="nofollow">energy companies</a> (in three parts) that I thought might catch public notice that year.  As we all now know, 2008 was a horrible year for speculative stocks, and my stocks were no exception, <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/update_ten_speculations_for_2008.html" rel="nofollow">losing an average of 55% that year</a>, although that still ended up being better than <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/clean_energy_mutual_funds_and_etfs_does_active_management_pay_1.html" rel="nofollow">seven out of nine of the sector mutual funds and ETFs that I was then tracking</a>.</p> <p>In 2009, my <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/ten_for_2009.html" rel="nofollow">ten green stock picks were more conservative</a>, with a focus on profitable companies with good cash flow.  The results have been better than I hoped.  These <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2008/12/in_review_10_clean_energy_stocks_for_2009.html" rel="nofollow"> 10 picks gained an average of 57%</a>, beating my</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/180084-10-clean-energy-stocks-for-2010?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bgc">BGC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mtz">MTZ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/chp">CHP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nfyif.pk">NFYIF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk">FGROF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prpx">PRPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wfiff.ob">WFIFF.OB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lltc">LLTC</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/flir">FLIR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wm">WM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/tom-konrad">Tom Konrad</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Transport Picks: A Clean Energy Stocks Shopping List</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/143099-5-transport-picks-a-clean-energy-stocks-shopping-list?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">143099</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <b>Stocks may be expensive now, but they won't be forever.  Five Peak Oil plays to buy when they're cheap again: Two bus companies, two rails, and an ETF.</b>
</p> <p>Two weeks ago, I told you <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2009/06/market_call_were_near_the_peak.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">why I feel that the market is more likely to head down than up from here</a> (it's been flat since then.)  I've been selling covered calls on my holdings, several of which have been called away.  I plan to sit on the cash until the market has fallen at least 10%, after which I may start selling cash covered puts, but I won't start buying in earnest until the level of fear in the markets is much higher than it is today.</p>  <p>To occupy myself during the wait, I'm putting together my shopping list of stocks I plan to buy when next they are cheap.  This first installment is a set of clean transport stocks, which</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:52:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Tom Konrad</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<img src='http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/TomKonrad.jpg' title='tom konrad' alt='tom konrad' width="75" height="82" border='1' align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6"/><strong>By  Tom Konrad (<a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/">AltEnergyStocks</a>): </strong><p>
  <b>Stocks may be expensive now, but they won't be forever.  Five Peak Oil plays to buy when they're cheap again: Two bus companies, two rails, and an ETF.</b>
</p> <p>Two weeks ago, I told you <a href="http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2009/06/market_call_were_near_the_peak.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">why I feel that the market is more likely to head down than up from here</a> (it's been flat since then.)  I've been selling covered calls on my holdings, several of which have been called away.  I plan to sit on the cash until the market has fallen at least 10%, after which I may start selling cash covered puts, but I won't start buying in earnest until the level of fear in the markets is much higher than it is today.</p>  <p>To occupy myself during the wait, I'm putting together my shopping list of stocks I plan to buy when next they are cheap.  This first installment is a set of clean transport stocks, which</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/143099-5-transport-picks-a-clean-energy-stocks-shopping-list?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nfyif.pk">NFYIF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/prpx">PRPX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fgrof.pk">FGROF.PK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/wab">WAB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/tom-konrad">Tom Konrad</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
