Seeking Alpha

FMC Technologies Inc. (FTI)

()

Comments on FTI

  • 25 Undervalued Stocks [View article]
    a lot of these stocks are overvalued! Was this a joke to make ppl lose money?
    Comment by danodanilo
    Dec 8 20:39 pm |
    Rating: 0 0
  • Sales Growth Expectations of S&P 500’s Top Performers [View article]
    With analysis like this, good luck.
    Comment by thotdoc
    Nov 26 10:18 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500's Top Returners in 2009 [View article]
    It would be nice see how the "valuation model" used to assess these stocks compares to things like PEG and price/(free cash flow per... More »
    Comment by constantnormal
    Nov 11 09:24 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500's Top Returners in 2009 [View article]
    Who is the "we" of this piece? Unbylined articles are not just anonymous, they're a nuisance. PanamaBob
    Comment by PanamaBob
    Nov 11 09:05 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500's Top Returners in 2009 [View article]
    A stock's return since January 1, 2009 seems pretty arbitrary. A better question is, how far is the stock off its high of 2007? (most... More »
    Comment by relayer75
    Nov 11 08:58 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500's Top Returners in 2009 [View article]
    One of the few viewpoints I've seen in recent times that says APPL is an "Unattractive" stock. Odd. Very odd.
    Comment by Jon T
    Nov 11 08:14 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500 New Highs Expanding... from a Low Base [View article]
    Great chart - where do you find this?
    Comment by MoeMan929
    Nov 6 10:20 am |
    Rating: 0 0
  • What's Driving Lithium? Merrill McHenry on the 'Technology' Metal [View article]
    There are already lots of battery makers out there in many countries, so I don't think there are lots of money left for investors in... More »
    Comment by mkreisel
    Sep 21 21:09 pm |
    Rating: 0 0
  • S&P 500 New Highs Expanding... from a Low Base [View article]
    I must wonder why Bernanke didn't simply state that the recession is over, as opposed to stating that it is "technically" over. He... More »
    Comment by Mary LaRue
    Sep 19 13:49 pm |
    Rating: +1 0
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    JAVA on this list, too? Although this list is backward-looking, I can't help thinking that people are looking at entries that will... More »
    Comment by BeachRider
    Sep 18 14:10 pm |
    Rating: +1 0
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    as the stock market is now essentially risk-free thanks to Fed intervention.... this list is surprisingly cheap. how much would you... More »
    Comment by ari5000
    Sep 17 21:32 pm |
    Rating: 0 0
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    Technically, it is possible to have a negative PE ratio as the annual earnings per share can be negative value. It does make some sense... More »
    Comment by Mike Trienis
    Sep 16 22:55 pm |
    Rating: 0 0
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    Isn't a P/E from a company having negative earnings, not 'Negative' as you state, but rather incalculable and thus 'N/A'?
    Sep 16 13:43 pm |
    Rating: +1 0
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    P/E?? That's so "yesterday". Our economy is in a new paradigm. This time, it's different...
    Comment by Channon
    Sep 16 13:01 pm |
    Rating: 0 -1
  • 100% Gainers and Their Estimated P/Es [View article]
    Apple's future P/E might be much lower due to new accounting rules. In the meantime a non-GAAP multiple could do aswell.
    Comment by Zoltan L. Kovacs
    Sep 16 12:57 pm |
    Rating: +2 0