UltraShort FTSE/Xinhua 25 Proshares (FXP)
-
Quote & Analysis
-
Forum
Loading...
Symbols:
FXP Forum Topics
- All Comments on FXP
- General Discussion on FXP
- Double Short ProShares ETFs [view article]
- Can China Carry the Post-Olympic Torch? [view article]
- Shanghai's Own Stock Market Rules [view article]
- China's Looming Hangover? [view article]
- Double Short ProShares ETFs: Volatility Goes Both Ways [view article]
- The Dollar Rally Ends [view article]
- The Globalization Boom and Bust Cycle [view article]
- ProShares UltraShort China ETF: Caveat Emptor! [view article]
- A U.S./China Comparison [view article]
- ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs [view article]
- ProShares ETFs: Why Volume Trading Makes a Difference [view article]
- Alternatives and Absolute Return with ETFs [view article]
Recent FXP Articles
- Can China Carry the Post-Olympic Torch?
- Shanghai's Own Stock Market Rules
- Double Short ProShares ETFs
- Double Short ProShares ETFs: Volatility Goes Both Ways
- China's Looming Hangover?
- The Dollar Rally Ends
- The Globalization Boom and Bust Cycle
- A U.S./China Comparison
- ProShares UltraShort and UltraLong ETFs
- Alternatives and Absolute Return with ETFs
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
loading ...
Shorting China and Financials: Money Left on the Table - A Cautionary Tale [view article]
HeadTooth - Why be so anal? The Dow has support, the NASDAWG has support, why can't the SKF have support? If enough people buying it think that it does, then it becomes a support. ReplyChina Now Down Over 40% from Highs [view article]
I think PE should go down to around 20-25 meaning Shanghai index goes down to around 2800-3000. Though it's painful for shareholders, it's good the bubble got bursted before it got too much worse and bring even more pain in the long run. Hopefully the market will consolidate around this level and just give us 15-20% returns annually. ReplyShorting China and Financials: Money Left on the Table - A Cautionary Tale [view article]
this author is an idiot of the highest order...ok..1 last time with regard to ETFs...charts mean nothing...the skf has 293 stocks in the index...so chart patterns mean nothing...
don't you people understand this...there is no chart support or resistance with an etf...because it could be any number of millions of combos of different stock movements of the underlying 293 companies...
does the lemming idiot crowd finally get this...?...
how could someone be so stupid as to NOT understand this... Reply
Shorting China and Financials: Money Left on the Table - A Cautionary Tale [view article]
The world's financial markets have degenerated into nothing more than a casino and that's why we have this dreadful mess. Have you guys ever thought of playing roulette? Your chances of winning are just under 50%. Replyerator
Shorting China and Financials: Money Left on the Table - A Cautionary Tale [view article]
The portfolios of the Ultra Short ETFs are somewhat incomprehensible for non-professional investors, consisting as they do of swaps, options, etc. That is why I often look at the regular, unleveraged corresponding ETF for signals. FXI, for example, has a set of underlying stocks as does XLF, which is the ETF I track as a kind of mirror-image of SKF. ReplyShorting China and Financials: Money Left on the Table - A Cautionary Tale [view article]
Interesting presentation. It seems to me that using rules for trading in regular positions (long) for trading in short positions (such as SKF) requires two distinct mental sets, which I do not possess. Where could one find out the portfolio of SKF? I got a prospectus from the sponsor but there is nothing specific. ReplyProShares UltraShort China ETF: Caveat Emptor! [view article]
I have held for quite awhile too and very very dissapointed. If SDS and QID can do it, I don't see why they can't do this either. It's just fuzzy math, and highly deceptive. Explain to me why today FXP is down 5% when last night the China index went down 5%. Shouldn't FXP be up at least 3 or 4%? And why all the intraday moves as well? Shouldn't it stay fairly stable during the US market since the Asian markets are closed?? ReplyTime to Get Serious About Utilizing Short ETFs [view article]
1- How does one short US Treasuries? 2- Rich, what in your view is teh risk for short funds, are they fully collateralized? ReplyChina Stocks: Risks Ahead [view article]
Non-food inflation is still mild. Chinese gov't should do more to promote food imports instead of hiking interest rates and reserve ratios. You are actually shorting Hong Kong H shares with FXP. IMO H shares are in the process of bottoming and shorting them at this valuation not rational. Even A share will not collapse but rather may go down to around 3000 and reach parity valuation with H shares. China's fundamentals are still bright. ReplyWhy It's Not Too Late to Short China [view article]
Downside is rather limited now since A shares historically carry a 50%+ premium over H shares. IOM H shares are already rather cheap and have bottomed. Your shorting of H shares with FXP is dangerous to the health of your portfolio.China's inflation is the result of excess liquidity from a variety of complex factors but I do see the problem easing a bit going forward. I have great confidence in China's growth. Reply
China Stocks: Risks Ahead [view article]
Those are government owned enterprises. The government is owned by communist party. What do you expect communists to behave when they own the companies. You cannot resist airing naive American thinking in public? ReplyChina Stocks: Risks Ahead [view article]
Interesting post, followed by a comment from GAZ, whose website is indispensible for any investor wanting an unvarnished and up-to-date view of the larger Chinese economy. A real eyeopener, GAZ ! Replyghts
Global 'Oil Shock' Rattles World Stock Markets [view article]
Quote from earlier poster"Unfortunately not only does it take at least 10 years to get a nuclear plant built, but infrastructurally speaking, it is impossible to produce that many nuclear plants quickly."
If it takes 10 years, so be it. 10 years will be here before we know it. We are something along the lines of 5 years or so into the Iraq war, halfway to ten. Ten years is nothing.
The real impediment, to me,is the ignorance infrastructure. Alas, blasting through that may be much harder. Also, the entrenched establishment infrastructure is tough. People want to protect their existing jobs and long-held cherished points of view. Reply
China Stocks: Risks Ahead [view article]
Chinese companies sole reason to be publicly listed is to get something for nothing. Most listed companies I have looked at in China over my 4 years of being here are not actually making profit in real life, only on their stocks. They hide the truth and invariably have government officials investing prior to listing which shields them from any laws that might exist. Many of them raise funds and act basically as shell companies feeding the money through to some other new venture or personal fund with no ties to the stock whatsoever, all with government officials on the payroll if they aren't the coordinators themselves.I've been here 4 years, speak the language, deal daily with listed companies and their staff, and I would NEVER invest in any Chinese stocks and it is clear to me that anyone who invests in ANY Mainland Chinese stocks usually has the false belief that trading is governed by laws. If you've invested in Chinese stocks, well, personally if that money was important to me I'd cut my losses or bubble gains right away before I lost all of it. Reply
Patterson
China Bubble Continues to Correct Itself [view article]
The Nasdaq and the S&P both hit new fresh lows on Monday and have not formed a bottom. The Dow is starting to look like a bottom with Monday being the correction that did not make a new low but we need another day or two to see if the upside leg will extend. Reply