General Mills Inc. (GIS)

All Comments on GIS

  • commenter
    Sep 06 05:27 PM
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    hey ray, i disagree with you especially on portfolio two..... they are not diversified as you think...VZ, BAC and ED are highly leveraged companies with their huge payouts and thus have tremendous exposure to rising rates if the dopey fed has anything to say about it.... the unpopular war and imminent troop pull out does not make GD attractive over the next two years....and as for GM...what can i say...the longer wagoner is there, the closer they are to bankruptcy....it's that simple...though not published yet inevitable, GM is third in line behind FNM and FRE for the government hand out.....
    starting from scratch a novice investor should consider the following portfolio...JNJ (or PG), GE (or MMM), MO (or UN), XOM (or SLB) and IBM (or CSCO)....here's two portfolios...the best of the best...and of course...completely diversified!
    Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 04 03:29 PM
    My Website
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    Starting from scratch these might be good portfolios. At least they are diversified! Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 04 01:33 PM
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    Right, the taxpayers get stuck with the bad debt and the banks get only the good parts? This is socialism pure and simple. Write your congressman and senator. If they don't respond appropriately then vote the bums out. Remember this is an election year and don't forget to VOTE! Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 04 08:59 AM
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    Cramer says year of natural gas. Don't listen to him. Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 04 08:38 AM
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    Cramer's game (and portfolio approvals) illustrates the danger of overemphasizing diversity at the expense of quality stock selection. Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 03 11:20 PM
    Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08) [view article]
    save for GD, portfolio 2 is "perfectly" in the crapper........... Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 19 06:44 PM
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    As a retired Colgate employee who ignored financial advisor's advice and hung on to a lot of company stock , I feel vindicated.
    They are well-positioned globally to grow in all the emerging economies and so far have been able to offset the high commodity prices.
    Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 18 06:17 PM
    My Website
    Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
    A Better Place: Almost everything you said is utter nonsense. If you voted for Bush you are partly responsible for the current Bush Recession. Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 13 08:49 PM
    My Website
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    Bizonly, thanks for the outlook on fast-food. I don't like the industry for personal reasons but it intrigued me how it would stay steady. Your explanation clears that up. Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 11 07:19 AM
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    in the seventies i attended a pillsbury meeting that explained that in a recession people traded down to fast food and of the top twenty things they cut- fast food was 17 -with traveling #1-

    pillsbury owned burger king at the time-all my money has been safely
    parked with bkc for over a year'turns out that meeting saved me
    over 250k
    Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 10 12:40 PM
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    JNJ is at its all-time high and still dirt cheap! Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 10 10:58 AM
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    Thanks for the question, 174242. I wanted to show the results without and without the worst performer, to eliminate a Single Companies operational issues from throwing off an entire sector's results. The other way that I could have done it was to use many more examples per sector (perhaps as many as 10), but that would have made the article too long. A good example is Wendy's which moved the entire sector down several spots on the chart.

    The results at the bottom DO include the worst performer....

    Cheers
    Larry
    Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 10 08:30 AM
    How Have 'Traditional Defensive Stocks' Done in This Downturn? [view article]
    What is the rationale for removing the worst performer when calculating the results? Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 07 03:42 PM
    Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
    First of all, I am not a Democrat and will not vote for a Democrat.
    I think most investors had a strong feeling that between now and election time, the Republicans would apply extreme pressure anywhere and in anyway they could to boost the market. They are having some success it seems. However, they can do the most in controlling commodity prices. Getting them down as we see happening now. Low and high estimates as needed to influence commodity prices, along with personal pressures applied to those in most control of the targeted commodities. No telling how low we will see some go in the near, but hold on after 2008.
    Reply
  • commenter
    Aug 07 01:49 PM
    Stocks At or Near 52-Week Highs [view article]
    I realize that IBM is not in the S&P, but it is a Dow component and near its 5 year high. It has had a great run. Reply