Infonet Services Corp. (IN)

All Comments on IN

  • commenter
    Sep 15 12:31 PM
    Underdog Smallcaps: Potential Short Squeezes [view article]
    Is it correct that
    1) short selling is legal,
    2) naked short selling is not,
    3) the damage is best done by massive naked short selling,
    4) the SEC put out some temporary rules last month to protect vulnerable financials from "excessive naked short selling damage"
    5) those temporary rules only protected a relatively small group of companies
    6) those temporary rules ended about a week ago
    7) they are now planning new rules to control short selling after the miseries of Monday, 9/15
    ----------------------...
    8) the new rules will be a new way to enforce the laws that have existed all through this insanity?

    Please which piece am I missing? Why is it not possible to enforce existing laws against a practice, but it is possible to enforce temporary "rules" against that same ILLEGAL practice?
    Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 15 01:02 AM
    Underdog Smallcaps: Potential Short Squeezes [view article]
    ALY, the Bronco merger looks dead in the water. Insiders have decided to walk away. I did too. Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 14 06:59 PM
    Underdog Smallcaps: Potential Short Squeezes [view article]
    very nice, thanks for the info Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 14 01:01 PM
    Underdog Smallcaps: Potential Short Squeezes [view article]
    Confusion to all shorters! Reply
  • commenter
    Sep 14 12:34 PM
    Underdog Smallcaps: Potential Short Squeezes [view article]
    J. Cinton Hill - I love your article, keep up the good work.
    Daniel Kowkabany
    Reply
  • commenter
    Jul 10 05:42 AM
    More Replacement Tickers for Reshaping David Merkel's Portfolio [view article]
    wouldn't SKM fit in the 'cheap for Korea' mold? Reply
  • commenter
    SeekingAlpha
    Editors
    Apr 06 05:20 AM
    My Website
    General Discussion on IN
    Is this a buy or a sell? Reply