IYZ Forum Topics
- All Comments on IYZ
- General Discussion on IYZ
- Asset Class Correlations [view article]
- S&P 500 Sector EPS Growth for Q2 [view article]
- What a Difference a Week Makes [view article]
- Sector Relative Strength (7/17/08) [view article]
- Sectors Tell an Important Story [view article]
- Percentage of Stocks Over 50-Day Moving Average [view article]
- Asset Allocation and the All ETF Portfolio [view article]
- Bespoke's Sector Snapshot (7/2/08) [view article]
- Average Stock Distance From 52-Week Highs [view article]
- First Half Sector and Stock Performance [view article]
- Market Breadth Back to Lows [view article]
- Primary US Sector ETFs [view article]
Recent IYZ Articles
- International Sector ETFs: State Street Takes on WisdomTree
- Sector Performance Surrounding Earnings
- Asset Class Correlations
- S&P 500 Sector EPS Growth for Q2
- Sector Relative Strength (7/17/08)
- All Financials
- What a Difference a Week Makes
- Percentage of Stocks Over 50-Day Moving Average
- Sectors Tell an Important Story
- Style Strategy: Why Sectors Resonate
- Full List of Articles »
loading ...
Corcoran
Asset Class Correlations [view article]
Regarding the increased correlation with the Japanese yen the rate you are referencing is the USD/JPY so increases in stocks is related to increased strength of dollar versus yen and not strength in the yen. This could be closely related to leverage being applied/wound down by hedge funds etc (when they are more bullish on stocks) via the carry trade ReplyAsset Class Correlations [view article]
More Lep in more places.What passes for valid numerical analysis is appalling. Reply
Asset Class Correlations [view article]
The majority of correlation coefficients shown are actually not that good. When you get down to 0.2 - 0.6, the association between the pairs of variables can still be jumpy. In fact, if you showed the X-Y scatter plots for a number of these matrix elements, you would probably be surprised at how noisy, jumpy and unrelated a lot of the series are. X-Y scatter plots would likely reveal problems and cause readers to ask why you tried to correlate a lot of these pair-vectors in the first place. At values of r=0.8 (-0.8) you will truly begin to see very tight patterns and tight trending between the data being correlated. The goal is to focus on high negative correlation, and the large negative correlation between the dollar and gold is actually good, since you would want to load a portfolio with something that is going to go up, on average, when the dollar goes down. (remember, though, gold is a commodity so the price is inflated in the direction in which the speculative buyers/sellers think it will go. ). Again, the majority of the coefficients are near-zero and low (less than r=0.2 or greater than r=-0.2) and uninteresting. Last, you are probably showing Pearson correlation, which can be biased by outlier pairs. Try using Spearman correlation, which is not biased by outliers. ReplyAsset Class Correlations [view article]
Thanks yuman. that helps. ReplyS&P 500 Sector EPS Growth for Q2 [view article]
Good info. I hope you keep updating this throughout the earnings season. ReplyAsset Class Correlations [view article]
DrBagel,I think 10-Yr treasuries in the tables are measured in price, not yield. The dollar drops with short terms rates, while gold rises (-0.64), so do bond prices. Reply
Asset Class Correlations [view article]
I dont understand why treasuries are inversely correlated with the dollar. Can someone explain? ReplyAsset Class Correlations [view article]
In the third chart, the vertical column of correlations for 10-yr is marked as slightly less correlation in the column, but largely less correlation in the row with the same numbers. The inverse is true of the yen, the column disagrees with the row, though for increased correlation.The numbers are the same, so I guess this is just coloring error. Reply
Markets
Asset Class Correlations [view article]
the only problem is that correlations are not static and so if you try and build a portfolio based on "asset class correlation" you might find yourself of mark real quick ReplyAsset Class Correlations [view article]
excellent! ReplyLowenthal
What a Difference a Week Makes [view article]
See 'The fakout shakeout' at www.lompie.blogspot.co... ReplySector Relative Strength (7/17/08) [view article]
whidbey, you have no creativity. Obviously you have to subscribe to their service if you want them to hold your hand. ReplySector Relative Strength (7/17/08) [view article]
What do you recommend, health care,utilities and telcom?Does it all mean that the government runs the markets directly or indirectly by it policy bias?
I fail to see what the benefits of your posts might be. Reply
Pseudonym
What a Difference a Week Makes [view article]
The trend reversed and then positive news was found.Bear markets don't go to zero in a straight line.
There will be big rallys' as we trend down.
The negative fundamentals are still there and when needed they will be the "news of the day" that explains why the market dropped.
The financial/economic mess won't really stabilize until roughly 2010. So between now and then be nimble and go with flow. Reply
What a Difference a Week Makes [view article]
Investors are cashing in on their gains and dipping into the beaten up areas. They have been waiting for anything positive to come out to reverse the trend and apparently they found it. Can it be sustained? Maybe - until the next IndyMac reminds people that there are still problems out there. Reply